Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Relinquishes Control of Internet
Guardian, UK ^ | September 30, 2009 | Bobbie Johnson

Posted on 10/02/2009 6:51:07 PM PDT by NorwegianViking

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-172 next last
Washington has said it will relinqush some control over the way the network is run and allow foreign governments more of a say in the future of the system.----I would like to know what Washington is giving up.
1 posted on 10/02/2009 6:51:08 PM PDT by NorwegianViking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NorwegianViking

—————I would like to know what Washington is giving up. ——————

Answer:

Freerepublic.com


2 posted on 10/02/2009 6:52:23 PM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing (MSM bias is dead. They are no longer "biased", they are complicit. The complicit progressive media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorwegianViking

Everything.

Get with the program bub!


3 posted on 10/02/2009 6:52:53 PM PDT by sauropod (People who do things are people that get things done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

I’m trying.


4 posted on 10/02/2009 6:58:14 PM PDT by NorwegianViking (Organizing for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NorwegianViking

What we are gaining is: Chinese communist, Canadian and European socialist speech restrictions. Not to mention the speech restrictions of our Muslim brothern in the world.

This is going to be TERRIBLE for freedom but right up the “Progressive’s” ally.


5 posted on 10/02/2009 7:00:12 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

Would you be more specific?
What are the ramifications of this?


6 posted on 10/02/2009 7:01:10 PM PDT by Marty62 (former Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NorwegianViking

Paragraphs are your friend.....


7 posted on 10/02/2009 7:02:38 PM PDT by GQuagmire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorwegianViking

jeez why dont we give away our first born


8 posted on 10/02/2009 7:03:42 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorwegianViking

While the Internet should never be under the control of ANY loser government(s), free speech was probably LEAST threatened when it was under US control. Now, the political floodgates are OPENED!


9 posted on 10/02/2009 7:05:06 PM PDT by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorwegianViking

All your innernets are belong to us.


10 posted on 10/02/2009 7:07:29 PM PDT by ozark hilljilly (Ignore us at your peril.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorwegianViking
This is all about the UN getting control of the Internet. World taxes is the net result along with censorship.
11 posted on 10/02/2009 7:08:23 PM PDT by JoSixChip (The only thing broken in this country is the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalebert

The libs are working on that


12 posted on 10/02/2009 7:08:56 PM PDT by alice_in_bubbaland (Markets and Marxists Don't Mix! Audit the FED NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NorwegianViking
But the fresh focus will give other countries a more prominent role in determining what takes place online, and even the way in which it happens – opening the door for a virtual United Nations, where many officials gather to discuss potential changes to the internet.

Virtual UN dictating the Internet. Great.
13 posted on 10/02/2009 7:08:56 PM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorwegianViking
Can obumber do this on his own without the congress?
14 posted on 10/02/2009 7:10:23 PM PDT by JoSixChip (The only thing broken in this country is the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

What, exactly, is the upside of this appararently idiotic decision? Were the US taxpayers handsomely reimbursed for developing this innovation? Will America benefit in any substantial way from this change? Why was it done with virtually no fanfare or public input. If not we, the people who funded the development of the internet, then exactly who benefits and why?


15 posted on 10/02/2009 7:11:49 PM PDT by mathurine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dalebert

Good Grief...don’t give them any ideas.


16 posted on 10/02/2009 7:12:26 PM PDT by Marty62 (former Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NorwegianViking

Why not? Democrat presidunces have pissed away everything else that was good and important. Panama Canal, Iran, great society, now health care and the internet.


17 posted on 10/02/2009 7:14:01 PM PDT by Freeper Fanatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorwegianViking

The inventor (Algore) is going to be pi$$ed.


18 posted on 10/02/2009 7:17:41 PM PDT by elkfersupper (Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorwegianViking

A far more intelligent solution is for an international conglomerate to form a true alternative to the Internet, that works exclusively by uncensored satellite transceivers. Up links and down links would be carefully controlled so that no government involvement is permitted.

Likely it would piggyback on the Internet as well, but as a means to leech, not upload. This means that the non-data window dressing of the system can be handled by the Internet, with only the restricted information being handled by the satellites.

For example, every part of the Free Republic that was not text would be transmitted on the Internet, and the Satellite would do only the text, and your computer would put the two together.

So all any snoop would see would be the blank FR home page, unless they could tap in to and decrypt the encrypted satellite down link.

As a controlled system, there would be no advertisement or spam, hacking, censorship or surveillance.

Since most of the Internet is “ordinary”, that is where users would spend most of their time. But any time they wanted to discuss sensitive things that others would interfere with, they activate the down link.


19 posted on 10/02/2009 7:18:56 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freeper Fanatic

And did our fawning MSM finally cover themselves with glory just this once by reporting on this story? Methinks they knew about this and liked it, because it may offer a way to stifle the free flow of information as it has evolved these last few years.


20 posted on 10/02/2009 7:20:22 PM PDT by mathurine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-172 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson