Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

After Chicago’s Loss, Critics Assail the U.S.O.C. (blame game ... yawn)
NYT ^ | 10/3/09 | Katie Thomas

Posted on 10/03/2009 1:30:11 PM PDT by xtinct

For weeks, the United States Olympic Committee and the national sports governing bodies it oversees had settled into an uncomfortable truce. Despite a year of upheaval and conflict, the parties had agreed to set aside their differences in solidarity for Chicago’s bid to win the 2016 Summer Games.

The truce ended as quickly as Chicago was dispatched from the race won by Rio de Janeiro. In surprisingly frank terms, a number of influential people in American Olympic sports questioned the performance of the U.S.O.C.’s new management team and said its two top executives were ill-equipped to navigate the insular world of international sports.

Chicago’s last-place finish in the I.O.C. voting on Friday in Copenhagen was the latest blow in a year marked by the departure of major sponsors, layoffs at U.S.O.C. headquarters, controversy over the salary of the acting chief executive, and the failed plan for an Olympic television network.

“Before we think about putting forth another Olympic city for a Games possibility, we’ve got to deal with some outstanding issues that are not going to go away,” said Mike Plant, who serves on the U.S.O.C.’s 10-member board and traveled to Copenhagen as part of the Chicago delegation. “I think that certainly there will be some dialogue that’s going to take place in the next couple of weeks — or certainly in short order.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2016olympics; blamegame; obama; usoc
Obambi, the beast, Oprah, etc. clearly took the leadership role in this quest... now their minions are trying to blame everyone else...

Give me a break !!!

1 posted on 10/03/2009 1:30:12 PM PDT by xtinct
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: xtinct

So I guess the U.S.O.C. is stocked full of racist, right-wing, nazi, bigoted red neck fear mongers?


2 posted on 10/03/2009 1:32:01 PM PDT by Kartographer (".. we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

The beauty of liberal failure, they cannot begin to fathom that they were solely responsible for the failure. So they will rationalize the loss as someone else’s fault and charge ahead again full steam towards the cliff they know is there.


3 posted on 10/03/2009 1:33:56 PM PDT by The Magical Mischief Tour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

Hard to see why the Olympic Committee is supposed to be impressed by Oprah, who has made a career of sitting on a couch overstating the obvious. There’s no Olympic event that requires these skills.


4 posted on 10/03/2009 1:36:21 PM PDT by purplelobster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

The IOC & USOC have been at odds for quite some time (mostly about $$$). But this was known during the entire bid process.

Methinks the Chicago bid team was into some serious self-delusion.


5 posted on 10/03/2009 1:36:59 PM PDT by Ready4Freddy (Everyone knows there's a difference between muslims & terrorists... no one knows what it is, though.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

The IOC chose to NOT hold its games in a filthy, crime-ridden city. Gee...go figure, huh! Rio may not be a whole lot better, but are there 30 murders each week?


6 posted on 10/03/2009 1:38:41 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

> So I guess the U.S.O.C. is stocked full of racist, right-wing, nazi, bigoted red neck fear mongers?

Don’t forget that Halliburton and Dubya ordered the IOC to screw Obeyme. It’s always Bush’s fault..


7 posted on 10/03/2009 1:41:16 PM PDT by max americana (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

I read an earlier article wherein the libRAT who wrote it said the “right-wing Obama-haters” would try to blame this on Obama. My first thought was, why shouldn’t we? The fact is had the IOC chosen Chicago Obama supporters would be crediting him for that decision. It would, of course, be all because of him. But now that Chicago has been rejected it’s not at all his fault. They can’t have it both ways.


8 posted on 10/03/2009 1:45:31 PM PDT by South40 (Islam has a long tradition of tolerance, ~Hussein Obama, June 4, 2009, Cairo, Egypt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: purplelobster

How about the luge? She’d go down the course pretty quickly.

Thank goodness for the clowns in Copenhagen. Now Rio gets saddled with the cost. My Brazilian relatives think it will cost the country $26 Billion by the time you include the graft. Maybe Hugo had something to do with the voting - just wondering.


9 posted on 10/03/2009 1:56:47 PM PDT by 12Gauge687 (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: max americana

Obeyme...love it.


10 posted on 10/03/2009 1:59:16 PM PDT by Pharmboy (The Stone Age did not end because they ran out of stones...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

Why are these people getting themselves all wee-wee’d up?
Saint Obama has already told us that victory isn’t important.

He has told the world that what is of importance is that the USA doesn’t try to be any more special than any other country.

But wasn’t it something out of “The Ugly American” when Obama took four jumbo-jets loaded with his staff, accoutrenments and his arrogant worshippers and tried to steamroller the IOC with their fables about growing up poor in racist America?

After all, it was their show; their day in the sun and he tried to steal the limelight.

Maybe the rest of the world is as sick of Obama inserting himself into every aspect of existence as are we Americans

People used to joke about the Clintons sucking all the air out of a room but they were small cheese compared to Obama.


11 posted on 10/03/2009 1:59:29 PM PDT by Iron Munro (You can't kill the beast while sucking at its teat - Claire Wolfe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 12Gauge687

luge ain’t that wide. they’d have to tear down the course after she got stuck.


12 posted on 10/03/2009 2:34:04 PM PDT by wiggen (Never in the history of our great country have the people had less representation than they do today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

OR...Rio gave a better presentation? Just a thought.


13 posted on 10/03/2009 2:53:09 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

They fly in separately on two jets with an entourage that would make the mafia blush. Good grief, they even brought Daily and Oprah! For openers, Obama puts down his own country. Even if some of their audience did hate the USA, everyone disrespects a turncoat.

Then Michelle has the audacity to say how some would consider her trip a sacrifice. Can you imagine how Americans would react if the wife of a foreign head of state came here and announced that some would consider this a sacrifice on her part? I think that alone sunk the deal.


14 posted on 10/03/2009 2:58:04 PM PDT by keats5 (Not all of us are hypnotized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

Doesn’t sound like Rio is exactly Nirvana....
“This new study by a think tank linked to the Roman Catholic Church suggests that things are improving. In 1994, out of every 100,000 inhabitants of Rio, 78 met a violent death.

Last year that figure had fallen to 50. In a way, this is a surprise. The violent drug gangs which control Rio’s shanty towns are still very much alive, and until recently the city’s police force was better known for its brutality than for its efficiency.

However, analysts say a number of factors have contributed to the fall in the number of murders. The local government has invested millions of dollars in an effort to integrate the shanty towns into the urban infrastructure.

Police operations have reduced the extent to which drug-related violence spills over into middle-class areas, and local non-governmental organisations have waged a tireless campaign to persuade people not to carry firearms.

But Rio continues to be a violent place. Its new, lower murder rate is still five times as high as that of New York, and meanwhile, in Brazil’s biggest city. Sao Paulo, the tide of murders in poor areas is rising inexorably. “


15 posted on 10/03/2009 3:01:03 PM PDT by Kozak (USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Reqiescat in Pace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

It’s really racist to not want the Olympics in Rio isn’t it?


16 posted on 10/03/2009 3:01:27 PM PDT by Tzimisce (No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

I wonder what kind of bilge will spew forth from oprah’s pie hole on her next show??


17 posted on 10/03/2009 3:04:42 PM PDT by taillightchaser (When a democrat says "The American people" you know the next words out of his mouth will be lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

18 posted on 10/03/2009 3:16:48 PM PDT by mojitojoe (Socialism is just the last “feel good” step on the path to Communism and its slavery. Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

But wasn’t it something out of “The Ugly American” when Obama took four jumbo-jets loaded with his staff, accoutrenments and his arrogant worshippers and...”
*********************

It sure was. And Humpty Dumpty Took a Great Fall

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/15366


19 posted on 10/03/2009 3:34:05 PM PDT by Canedawg (FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Canedawg
And Humpty Dumpty Took a Great Fall

Thanks for the link -
.

20 posted on 10/03/2009 3:46:30 PM PDT by Iron Munro (You can't kill the beast while sucking at its teat - Claire Wolfe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

You’re welcome. Thank you for your service,


21 posted on 10/03/2009 3:49:34 PM PDT by Canedawg (FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

they’ll blame MS PowerPoint if they have to.


22 posted on 10/03/2009 4:03:06 PM PDT by Ancient Drive (DRINK COFFEE! - Do Stupid Things Faster with More Energy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xtinct
Olympics for Chicago 2016 - The Cost to the People of the United States:

A - The First Lady:

1. Unhidden cost of her US aircraft to and from Copenhagen?

2. Cost and detailed list of accompanying staff currently on the US payroll?

3. Cost of accompanying staffs' accommodations, food, refreshments, local travel (taxi), Official Transportation, etc. for First Lady's party?

4. Any additional aircraft for First Lady's party, for folks like family, press, dog, Secret Service?

5. Amount Opra is reimbursing the USA for her envolvement and that of her staff for #1 - #4, above?

6. Amount the Chicago Olympic Committee is reimbursing the USA for the First Lady's envolvement and that of her staff for #1 - #4, above?

B - POTUS

1. True and total unhidden cost of Air Force One for the trip to and from Copenhagen?

2. Cost and detailed list of accompanying staff currently on the US payroll?

3. Cost of accompanying staffs' accommodations, food, refreshments, local travel (taxi), Official Transportation, etc. for the POTUS's party?

4. Any additional aircraft for POTUS's party, for folks like family, press, dog, Secret Service?

5. Cost US picking for accompanying Press Corps, including travel, accomodations, food, refreshments, etc.?

6. Cost of flying the POTUS "big black car" and the accompanying Secret Service vehicles, drivers, fuel, staff accomodations, food and refreshments?

7. Amount the Chicago Olympic Committee is reimbursing the USA for the POUS's envolvement and that of his staff for #1 - #6, above?

C - Total net expense for "A" & "B" to the USA Tax Payers?

All I ask for a a true and honest (if that is not redundant!) of this "excercise" to the American Public. I'd be interested to also know who has personal vested interests in the possible favorable outcome for this adventure, specifically relating to the possible sale of real estate and other servicees should the Chicago Olympic Committee - 2016 be successful.

That's all I ask. Starting to think of the length of time a snow flake or many snow flakes can survive in Hell while I await the answer to the forgoing questions.

When will someone in the "main stream" news business address any of these questions and share the results with us.

23 posted on 10/03/2009 5:38:30 PM PDT by jws3sticks (Sarah Palin forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
Chicago was dispatched from the race won by Rio de Janeiro.
The local garbage wrapper attributed this to (not in so many words) anti-American attitudes on the International Olympics committee. The fact is, there are those who hate the United States here and there, but the real reason for the decision is that there has never been a summer Olympics in South America. Not sure about winter Olympics, but I'm doubtin' it.
24 posted on 10/03/2009 5:39:26 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

If only the IOC wasn’t racist, Chicago would’ve had the games.//sarc off


25 posted on 10/03/2009 6:17:02 PM PDT by vox_freedom (America is being tested as never before in its history. May God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xtinct
We are stuck with a wishy washy village idiot as a POTUS and it's time we as the public accept this fact.

It's called "taking the bull by the horns"!

We are the government after all, aren't we as the people? /s

26 posted on 10/03/2009 6:38:09 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

from 2005

http://www.letterfromthecapitol.com/letterfromthecapitol/2005/04/world_murder_ca.html

World Murder Capital?

Rio de Janeiro’s name means River of January, and the city is known to its cariocas as “Marvelous City.” But a Washington Times piece today makes clear that Murderous City is a more appropriate title. A staggering 80 to 95 people a day are killed in Rio, mostly by drug gang shootouts in the favela slums that ring the city. This translates in round figures to 29,000 to 35,000 annually. Rio is a city of 10 million, roughly 25% more than inhabit New York City. Thus for NYC a comparable murder toll range would be 23,000 to 28,000; the 2004 NYC figure was under 600. Put another way, Rio has some 40 to 50 times NYC’s per capita murder rate, with a 300 to 350 murders per 100,000 rate. (The per capita number of 55 per 100,000 given in the WT article for Rio is clearly wrong—someone misplaced a decimal point.) One final frame of reference: With a US population of about 300 million, 30 times Rio’s total, multiply the annual Rio murder range by 30 to get an equivalent murder total for the US: the range would be, in round figures, 850,000 to 1.1 million!!!! See a problem here?


27 posted on 10/03/2009 6:48:28 PM PDT by doug from upland (10+ million views of HILLARY! UNCENSORED - put some ice on it, witch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer
"So I guess the U.S.O.C. is stocked full of racist, right-wing, nazi, bigoted red neck fear mongers?

It's obvious, Karto. The USOC headquarters are in Colorado Springs, you know. Home of Focus on the Family, you know, and only gave Obama 39%, you know.

28 posted on 10/03/2009 7:45:29 PM PDT by cookcounty (Did Charlie Gibson run out of No-Doz again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 12Gauge687
How about the luge? She’d go down the course pretty quickly.

The flapping skin would sound like a 1971 Gremlin running full speed over rumble strips. (And factoring in wind resistance, probably about as slow.)
29 posted on 10/03/2009 11:27:08 PM PDT by Renderofveils (My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music. - Nabokov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

But I thought it was all Bush’s fault? This story flies in the face of that early claim.


30 posted on 10/04/2009 2:27:48 AM PDT by bustinchops (Teddy ("The Hiccup") Kennedy - the original water-boarder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

By comparison to the ostammers, the Clintons were a class act, and that’s a hilarious notion!


31 posted on 10/04/2009 2:31:31 AM PDT by bustinchops (Teddy ("The Hiccup") Kennedy - the original water-boarder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: keats5

I keep wondering why SO many black Americans are intent on being the center of attention and bringing so much focus to themselves. You see it in stores, schools, movie theaters, work, sports games, everywhere - black Americans doing whatever it takes to always make a spectacle of themselves in some way. Not all of them do this, by any means, but a very sizable and noticeable number - far more than whites who outnumber them in the population about 6:1.

Ostentatious displays of wealth and power are SO tasteless.

Ostammer and Her Neandethalness remind me more and more of the Beverly Hillbillies - or maybe George Jefferson, lol.


32 posted on 10/04/2009 2:40:40 AM PDT by bustinchops (Teddy ("The Hiccup") Kennedy - the original water-boarder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bustinchops
You got that. As much as I hate all of the Clintonroids he at least had a few who would have seen the writing on the wall and talked him out lighting this gargantuan exploding cigar. Obama hired a bunch of former Clintonroids but we can clearly see that he didn’t get any of the sharpest knives in the drawer.

Obama only has one definite path now, full steam ahead with more leftism. He sees how well it's working for the MSM. /sarcasm

This is the first rock solid proof that not only doesn't Obama have a clue, he can't even buy one.

33 posted on 10/04/2009 2:51:28 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

In a nutshell (and buried in the last paragraph) ...

DeFrantz said criticism of the U.S.O.C. missed the larger point: that Rio de Janeiro was destined to win. “It was all about going to a different part of the world,” she said.


34 posted on 10/04/2009 2:58:22 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ready4Freddy
The IOC & USOC have been at odds for quite some time (mostly about $$$). But this was known during the entire bid process.

Methinks the Chicago bid team was into some serious self-delusion.

Exactly. If the NYT knew this, the white house should have known it also. Likewise Obama knew, or should have known, the political landscape of the IOC and the gamble he was taking. Yet after losing the bid Gibbs said, "I don't understand IOC politics." Axelrod told CNN, "I think that there are politics everywhere, and there are politics inside that room."

Getting the Olympic bid required what Obama is best at: politics and campaigning. During the campaign last fall Obama didn't make errors in political judgment like this. Now, everyone should be questioning his judgment in pursuing, not only the Olympics, but his hell bent dash for socialized medicine. Can Obama and his advisers not see the peril in ignoring the political landscape--56% disapproval of health care reform--while holding to the belief that Obama's (supposed) ability to win people over will make everything OK?

And another thing. If the US had been the bad actor on the world stage for all of Michelle's life (until a year ago), how did we manage to win Olympic bids for Lake Placid in 1980, LA in 1984, Atlanta in 1996, and Salt Lake City in 2002? Replacing an imagined national arrogance with the certain personal arrogance of the Obama's is a sure loser. The rest of the world sees it and so should all Americans.

35 posted on 10/04/2009 3:33:58 AM PDT by vamoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xtinct
But no critics assail Mayor Daley, The Messiah or the assorted homies killing people.

Welcome to Obama's Amerika.

36 posted on 10/04/2009 4:48:12 AM PDT by nonliberal (Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

Ping. That must be it. The World’s President is finding out the world can be a cruel place. What did The Dear Leader think, I wonder? That he and “we’ll take no prisoners Michelle” would by their mere presense make it a fait accompli for a Chicago Olympics?

There is no way the Europeans would support a US Olympics this year. Their too busy trying to create the “One Europe” thing. Anyway, from what I’ve read about how the IOC selects Olympic cities, that decision had already been made before the Copenhagen meeting. Onada and his crowd were shown up to be the ideological amateurs they are.


37 posted on 10/04/2009 4:58:02 AM PDT by dools007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vamoose
And another thing. If the US had been the bad actor on the world stage for all of Michelle's life (until a year ago), how did we manage to win Olympic bids for Lake Placid in 1980, LA in 1984, Atlanta in 1996, and Salt Lake City in 2002?

Good post, vamoose. Not to mention making the final four for 2016 on GWB's watch, in 2008.

Sounds like the 0 team got took, too, by the Chicago bid squad. The locals told 0 (and the media) that they were front-runners; 0 team apparently didn't do much if any verification, and blindly walked into 4th place.

38 posted on 10/04/2009 6:47:16 AM PDT by Ready4Freddy (Everyone knows there's a difference between muslims & terrorists... no one knows what it is, though.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: purplelobster

Or why Obama thought the Olympic committee was interested in why he chose to live in Chicago, or that Chicago was excited to sit and watch Obama win the Presidency.

In his entire speech, he spent one sentence mentioning Chicago’s success in international events, and one of them was the worlds fair that was, like, a generation ago.


39 posted on 10/04/2009 7:26:04 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson