Skip to comments.
Barack Obama furious at General Stanley McChrystal speech on Afghanistan
Telegraph UK ^
| 05 Oct 2009
| Alex Spillius
Posted on 10/04/2009 4:07:18 PM PDT by opentalk
According to sources close to the administration, Gen McChrystal shocked and angered presidential advisers with the bluntness of a speech given in London last week.
The next day he was summoned to an awkward 25-minute face-to-face meeting on board Air Force One on the tarmac in Copenhagen, where the president had arrived to tout Chicago's unsuccessful Olympic bid.
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; angrydems; bho44; bhofascism; commanderinchief; democrats; emperornoclothes; emptysuit; mcchrystal; nationalsecurityfail; nsp; nss; obama; tempertantrum; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200 ... 251-264 next last
1
posted on
10/04/2009 4:07:18 PM PDT
by
opentalk
To: opentalk
2
posted on
10/04/2009 4:08:10 PM PDT
by
behzinlea
To: opentalk
Who else but the UK press.
3
posted on
10/04/2009 4:10:29 PM PDT
by
devane617
(Free HOLLY101 -- After all, she is right.)
To: opentalk
I think the general wanted some TRUTH out there before Obama (the great decision maker) altered it.
To: behzinlea
That great Democratic president had a little sign on his desk “The Buck Stops Here”
If you can’t take the heat, stay out of the kitchen.
5
posted on
10/04/2009 4:10:54 PM PDT
by
donmeaker
(Invicto)
To: behzinlea
didn’t this guy come out after the meeting and say he was okay with the Obamapresent not giving him the troops?
To: opentalk
Could also read:
“furious that the truth leaked out”
To: opentalk
"You can't handle the truth!"
-- Jack Nicholson
8
posted on
10/04/2009 4:11:56 PM PDT
by
Rocko
("Too much of nothing can make a man a liar" -- Bob Dylan)
To: opentalk
Well, now we need to see the speech.
link?
9
posted on
10/04/2009 4:12:00 PM PDT
by
Safrguns
To: opentalk
if Gen. is replaced 0 looks indecisive
if Gen. does not get reinforcements 0 looks like a bad CIC and indecisive.
10
posted on
10/04/2009 4:12:35 PM PDT
by
omega4179
(pos approval rating -11)
To: opentalk
Hard decisions are required right now. Hussein votes “Present.”
11
posted on
10/04/2009 4:12:44 PM PDT
by
arthurus
("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
To: opentalk
General Zinni of all people is suggesting that O is nearly ‘dithering’. That there has been a plan in place since last March and there is no reason for the delay.
12
posted on
10/04/2009 4:13:25 PM PDT
by
Carley
(OBAMA IS A MALEVOLENT FORCE IN THE WORLD)
To: opentalk
Obammy is a great general! Love and kisses and olympics will save Afghanistan!
13
posted on
10/04/2009 4:13:26 PM PDT
by
Dallas59
To: arthurus
White House inner circle: “How do we blame this one on Bush.”
Methinks Zero’s lack of everything that counts is really showing.
To: opentalk
General McChrystal should tell ZERO that either ZERO gives General McChrystal what he needs to win or General McChrystal will submit his resignation and then IMMEDIATELY go to Fox News and tell America how it REALLY is under ZERO.
15
posted on
10/04/2009 4:14:20 PM PDT
by
teletech
(Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
To: omega4179
Why do modern day Democrat President’s make lousy Commander in Chiefs?
16
posted on
10/04/2009 4:14:34 PM PDT
by
pacpam
(action=consequence and applies in all cases - friend of victory)
To: opentalk
Sounds like McCrystal and British Army General David Richards are on the same page.
Time for Zero to make a decision.
17
posted on
10/04/2009 4:14:53 PM PDT
by
smokingfrog
(No man's life, liberty or property is safe while the legislature is in session. I AM JIM THOMPSON)
To: omega4179
Suppose the general and his boss Petraeus resign in protest of the O policies?
18
posted on
10/04/2009 4:15:42 PM PDT
by
Lucius Cornelius Sulla
(He said red, yellow, black or white, All are equal in his sight, Mmm, mmm, mm!, Barack Hussein Obama)
To: opentalk
He went on to say: "Waiting does not prolong a favorable outcome. This effort will not remain winnable indefinitely, and nor will public support." The remarks have been seen by some in the Obama administration as a barbed reference to the slow pace of debate within the White House.
Gen McChrystal delivered a report on Afghanistan requested by the president on Aug 31, but Mr Obama held only his second "principals meeting" on the issue last week. Ouch. Better put some ice on that Barry.
To: opentalk
If Obama doesn't like it let him sack him.
The general has a responsibility to those who are serving.
20
posted on
10/04/2009 4:16:09 PM PDT
by
mware
(F-R-E-E, that spells free. Free Republic.com baby.)
To: opentalk
The picture on the front page of the Washington Times shows Obama yacking away, mouth wide open, at Gen McChrystal. Gen McChrystal was shown sitting, mouth closed. Obama is clearly not about to listen to anything Gen McChrystal has to say about the matter. We’re screwed.
To: RummyChick
That's what was reported: that if Obama said "no," he'd make do with existing troop levels.
I wonder what the truth is?
To: opentalk
If the Kenyan is unhappy with the general, he should fire him. If not, the magic muslim and his winged monkeys should STFU and give the general the requested troops
23
posted on
10/04/2009 4:17:18 PM PDT
by
jimbo123
To: devane617
Yeap, The Telegraphy. I have taken to reading that paper before any in the states.
24
posted on
10/04/2009 4:17:43 PM PDT
by
mware
(F-R-E-E, that spells free. Free Republic.com baby.)
To: pacpam
No President should ever be elected without military experience. It must be terriblty humiliating for a general who worjked his way to the top ranks to be ordered to report to a Kenyan who hates America.
25
posted on
10/04/2009 4:17:47 PM PDT
by
Venturer
To: opentalk
I’d like to have been a fly on the wall during that meeting. I have very little doubt that Gen McChrystal just about made Obambi wee wee himself by not backing down. Does anyone else think that McChrystal told him, “You hired me. How do you think it’ll look when you fire me?” But, since Obambi can’t stand being told he’s wrong, it won’t be long before McChrystal is gone. Maybe Clark will return to active duty?
To: opentalk
re: "People aren't sure whether McChrystal is being naïve or an upstart. To my mind he doesn't seem ready for this Washington hard-ball and is just speaking his mind too plainly.")))
Huh? A general with this kind of experience being "naive"? Does this idiot mean politically naive? McChrystal, who face down terrorists, is hardly intimidated by ballet-dancers and Mayor Daley's Fixer.
27
posted on
10/04/2009 4:18:41 PM PDT
by
Mamzelle
(Who is Kenneth Gladney? (Don't forget to bring your cameras))
To: RummyChick
I don’t recall him saying anything after the meeting or should I say Dressing Down. Hopefully Stanley will stand his ground and make the Post Turtle fire him so he doesn’t give the impression that he is giving up on those under his command. By forcing the Post Turtle’s hand General McCrystal will put this charlatain in a box he will never be able to extricate himself from.
28
posted on
10/04/2009 4:19:07 PM PDT
by
mazda77
(Rubio for US Senate)
To: opentalk
HA!!! I posted that the 25 mins was just enough time for the Kenyan to give the general the dressing down he so richly didn’t deserve.
29
posted on
10/04/2009 4:19:47 PM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
("The President has borrowed more money to spend to less effect than anybody on the planet. " Steyn)
To: opentalk
He added that it was highly unusual for a senior military officer to "pressure the president in public to adopt his strategy". It's also highly unusual for a Commander-in-Chief to meet with the leader of what he calls the most important front in the the War on Terror Overseas Contingency Operation only once in 70+ days.
They finally met for 25 minutes, most of which was probably spent dressing down the general and explaining to the general how he was messing up the One's plans.
30
posted on
10/04/2009 4:20:23 PM PDT
by
AZLiberty
(Yes, Mr. Lennon, I do want a revolution.)
To: opentalk
Heh, heh. Sweet! I guess he was expected to tow the line and he somehow stepped over it and gave his own opinion instead of Obambi’s. I LOVE IT.
31
posted on
10/04/2009 4:21:00 PM PDT
by
Marysecretary
(GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL!)
To: pacpam
Because they hate the military.
32
posted on
10/04/2009 4:22:12 PM PDT
by
Marysecretary
(GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL!)
To: donmeaker
Great, the general get bitched out because Obama couldnt shine on the IOC.
Crap does flow downhill, doesnt it.
Instead of spending the time asking questions, Obamas mangina flairs up and screams like a scorned woman.
Disgusting.....
33
posted on
10/04/2009 4:22:27 PM PDT
by
Yorlik803
( Better to die on your feet than live on your knees.)
To: opentalk
A picture of our hero:
34
posted on
10/04/2009 4:22:36 PM PDT
by
50mm
(AARP is a steaming pile)
To: opentalk
Well I am furious at Obama for killing our SOLIDERS!!!!!!
35
posted on
10/04/2009 4:22:45 PM PDT
by
GregB
(Attention Sarah Palin supporters!!it cost 1 dollar to read this.Please send your money to Sarah!!!!)
To: opentalk
So he didn’t listen to McCrystal after all. No talk about the needs in Afghanistan.
Just a scolding for embarrassing the President. That’s the really IMPORTANT thing. Never mind that our troops are dying because of ludicrous ROEs and insufficient support.
36
posted on
10/04/2009 4:23:27 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: opentalk
Our boy king of zamunda knows more than all our generals put together...NOT!
37
posted on
10/04/2009 4:25:03 PM PDT
by
spectre
(Spectre's wife)
To: opentalk
“Gen McChrystal shocked and angered presidential advisers ...”
The military answers the question who lost Afghanistan.
The Kenyan did.
38
posted on
10/04/2009 4:25:31 PM PDT
by
y6162
(uish..)
To: opentalk
If Obama doesn’t want truth from his Generals, what does he want?
39
posted on
10/04/2009 4:25:35 PM PDT
by
PGR88
To: pacpam
I think they all where except Truman.
40
posted on
10/04/2009 4:25:43 PM PDT
by
omega4179
(pos approval rating -11)
To: opentalk
An adviser to the administration said: "People aren't sure whether McChrystal is being naïve or an upstart. To my mind he doesn't seem ready for this Washington hard-ball and is just speaking his mind too plainly." I'm speechless. Who's the naive one in this episode?
41
posted on
10/04/2009 4:25:53 PM PDT
by
rabidralph
(http://www.thealaskafundtrust.com/ http://www.sarahpac.com)
To: PGR88
42
posted on
10/04/2009 4:25:58 PM PDT
by
omega4179
(pos approval rating -11)
To: opentalk
Bruce Ackerman, an expert on constitutional law at Yale University, said in the Washington Post: "As commanding general, McChrystal has no business making such public pronouncements."
43
posted on
10/04/2009 4:26:09 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(Hear us, O Bama: Mmm, mmm, mmm.)
To: omega4179
and if 0 sends reinforcements he looks Bushlike. He cannot win.
44
posted on
10/04/2009 4:26:48 PM PDT
by
omega4179
(pos approval rating -11)
To: opentalk
People aren't sure whether McChrystal is being naïve or an upstart. To my mind he doesn't seem ready for this Washington hard-ball and is just speaking his mind too plainly."There's only one person in the equation that's a naive upstart ... and it isn't the good General.
45
posted on
10/04/2009 4:27:10 PM PDT
by
tx_eggman
(Obama has "Czars" because men with more integrity than he has still use the titles "Don" and "Capo")
To: opentalk
Telegraph UK = Media Free America, to counter the US government media censorship.
46
posted on
10/04/2009 4:27:18 PM PDT
by
aimhigh
To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
Suppose the general and his boss Petraeus resign in protest of the O policies?Enter Wesley Clark and neither general wants to have that happen. Clark is Obama's checkmate to their resignation threat.
47
posted on
10/04/2009 4:27:32 PM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
("The President has borrowed more money to spend to less effect than anybody on the planet. " Steyn)
To: pacpam
I know a lot of people do not like the draft but in the U.S. not only do we no longer stress the concept of winning with our children in any arena, most of the people in the U.S. have never been in the military and haven’t a clue. Either we elect a President who understands military engagement and the rules of this game or they must rely on their field commanders. BO has neither attribute nor does anyone around him. This is not lawn tennis at the local club on Sunday afternoon!
48
posted on
10/04/2009 4:27:41 PM PDT
by
Grams A
(The Sun will rise in the East in the morning and God is still on his throne.)
To: pacpam
Why do modern day Democrat Presidents make lousy Commander in Chiefs?
Because their true calling is to be on Saturday Night Live or some other appropriate entertainment venue.
49
posted on
10/04/2009 4:27:49 PM PDT
by
carumba
(The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made. Groucho)
To: opentalk
WAAAAAAAAAHHHH!
Truth hurts, don’t it, Zero?
50
posted on
10/04/2009 4:27:49 PM PDT
by
clee1
(We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200 ... 251-264 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson