Skip to comments.
Get away from her you b#%$@ - the Power Loader suit to become a reality
Gizmag.com ^
| 10/04/09
| Darren Quick
Posted on 10/05/2009 6:50:13 AM PDT by Reaganesque

Science-fiction is well on the way to becoming science fact with engineers from Activelink, a Kyoto-based subsidiary of Panasonic, developing an exoskeleton suit inspired by the "Power Loader" suit Ripley wore in her climactic battle with the Queen Alien in Aliens. And, just like in the movie, the Power Loader suit is designed to give its wearer superhuman strength for the lifting of heavy objects in the movie it was cargo, but Activelink also has construction and disaster relief operations in its sights.
The suit is constructed from an aluminum-alloy frame and weighs 230kg (507 lbs). Similar to the Robot Suit Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) we looked at earlier this year, the current version of the new suit contains 18 electromagnetic motors, which are controlled by components that measure the direction and magnitude of the force applied by the human operator. These motors allow the human operator to easily lift loads of 100kg (220 lbs), and the control system also provides force feedback to directly feel the behavior of the suit. Activelink says this allows the user to establish a correspondence between his own operation and the movement of the robot.
The Power Loader suit is currently in development, but Activelink has plans to release a version of the robot suit to the market by the 2015.
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: alien; loader; power; reality

Science fiction becomes a reality. Kinda figures though. When I first saw "Aliens," the power lifter seemed to make a lot of sense and I wondered why such a thing didn't exist. Leave it to the Japanese to bring it to reality. Next stop: real Gundam style battle-bots!
To: Reaganesque
Nice. A human forklift...The “ForkYou”.
2
posted on
10/05/2009 6:53:55 AM PDT
by
Wolfie
To: Reaganesque
There is a video as well at the link.
To: Reaganesque
You know the military will be interested
4
posted on
10/05/2009 6:55:21 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(California : bankrupt ideas from bankrupt people from a bankrupt state now bankrupting America)
To: Reaganesque
Useless without load-bearing legs.
The arms can lift a ton? Good, but human legs can’t support it.
5
posted on
10/05/2009 6:57:08 AM PDT
by
wastedyears
(The best aid we could ever give Africa would be thousands of rifles to throw out their own dictators)
To: Reaganesque
Augmented worksuits as a concept are much older than that movie.
6
posted on
10/05/2009 6:59:02 AM PDT
by
ltc8k6
To: wastedyears
It does have legs. Watch the video.
To: Reaganesque
Let me know when they start building Mechwarriors.
8
posted on
10/05/2009 7:01:56 AM PDT
by
EricT.
("Mankind, when left to themselves, are unfit for their own government." -George Washington)
To: Reaganesque
But will it be useful for groping someone on a crowded Japanese subway?
9
posted on
10/05/2009 7:02:58 AM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Rio: Gold / Madrid: Silver / Tokyo: Bronze / Obama: Lead weight.)
To: Reaganesque
The US military has one that is way better already.
10
posted on
10/05/2009 7:03:45 AM PDT
by
xcamel
(The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
To: EricT.
To: KarlInOhio
“But will it be useful for groping someone on a crowded Japanese subway? “
Yes. But only once!
12
posted on
10/05/2009 7:05:34 AM PDT
by
mark3681
To: Reaganesque
If they can perfect the manipular action to allow finer control, myriads of nurses will bless the use of these devices to help with the turning and bathing of very heavy patients!(as well as assisting with agressive Physical therapy which often gets deferred to the point of neglect)
To: wastedyears
That’s what I noticed.
So what if the arms can lift 100 kg - all the weight is still on human shoulders, back, and legs.
14
posted on
10/05/2009 7:08:28 AM PDT
by
MrB
(Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
To: EricT.
I never have understood why giant robots would ever beat a good tank. Lots of moving parts and thin sections mean that the arms and legs can't be very heavily armored. A lot of height means that it is very visible at the same time people want to make tanks shorter to hide better. Also the small size of the feet compared to the overall size means that ground pressure will be much higher on the robot than the tank. You better not be fighting on anything other than concrete or late August midwest soil - during Spring it would quickly sink down to its waist in mud.
[And no, I didn't spend far too much time watching anime in my youth :-) ]
15
posted on
10/05/2009 7:09:46 AM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Rio: Gold / Madrid: Silver / Tokyo: Bronze / Obama: Lead weight.)
To: Reaganesque
Anyone remember the PADD, Star Trek TNG's Personal Access Display Device", the little I/O data gadget carried like a clipboard on board the Enterprise D? Look at today's PDA's, mini-laptops mainly for Internet data, and the rapidly expanding IPhone-style cell phone. (Or for that matter, the re-mapping touch sensitive control panels that today more and more are in banks and fast-food places.) The "isn't that a cool idea" device of SF always predates the actual enginhttp://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/PADDeered, real-world tool!
The PADD
16
posted on
10/05/2009 7:22:01 AM PDT
by
50sDad
(The Left cannot understand life is not in a test tube. Raise taxes, & jobs go away.)
To: Reaganesque
“Lt. John Rico, please report to Armoring.”
17
posted on
10/05/2009 7:24:31 AM PDT
by
CholeraJoe
(Member of AARP - Armed And Really Pi$$ED!)
To: Reaganesque
When I saw it in the movie, I thought the same thing. I thought maybe we did have one of those things already or that somebody was at least working on it.
18
posted on
10/05/2009 7:29:18 AM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(I don't remember Americans being called "racists" when we fought against Hillarycare.)
To: KarlInOhio
I believe that real Mechs are a pipedream: but there’s certainly room for Powered Armor, which is more what this article is about.
But considering Mechs a moment: the handwave might be that these giant MechWarriors (or whatever) have room for a Fusion Reactor, and that their shape is therefore optimal for heat dissipation.
All that power for transmission, all that surface area for dissipation, some clever stabilization and suddenly you have a 50 tonne monster running at 150 mph (!)
I guess Mech-enthusiasts could also argue that the legs are indeed relatively weakly armored, but they’re also losable: if you have six of them then you can potentially lose three before falling over - that’s three tank-killing hits that only slowed you down. And being able to make a pop-up attack from behind a house is pretty cool :0)
To: Reaganesque
Center of balance is all wrong.
Anything over a couple of hundred pounds would cause Ripley to fall forward.
20
posted on
10/05/2009 7:31:23 AM PDT
by
kidd
(Obama: The triumph of hope over evidence)
To: KarlInOhio
They won’t.
Aside from complexity issues (tanks are pretty darn complex, too) there are issues with concealment, balance (and getting knocked over by recoil...), and armor distribution.
IMHO, the thing that makes the “giant robot” war machine popular in some imaginations is that is a knight’s steed, armor, and magic sword in one large package...
21
posted on
10/05/2009 7:35:24 AM PDT
by
Little Ray
(Obama is a kamikaze president aimed at the heart of this Republic.)
To: GeronL
They’ve already got several models, more advanced, in the works.
22
posted on
10/05/2009 7:36:10 AM PDT
by
pgkdan
( I miss Ronald Reagan!)
To: pgkdan
Some machine guns, a couple of rocket launchers, maybe a larger model someday with twin tank-like turrets....
Maybe the driver would be enclosed in a protective shell....
You know where this is going...
lots and lots of periods.....
=o)
23
posted on
10/05/2009 7:45:01 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(California : bankrupt ideas from bankrupt people from a bankrupt state now bankrupting America)
To: Reaganesque
For those of you insisting that this thing is useless because it doesn't have legs, here is a full length picture of the device. Please note the metalic objects behind and below the wearer's legs and feet.
To: CholeraJoe
Lt. John Rico, please report to Armoring. Exactly the one I was thinking. I think Heinlein was first.
25
posted on
10/05/2009 7:45:57 AM PDT
by
techcor
(I hope Obama succeeds... in becoming a one term president.)
To: EricT.
I want one. But mine needs to have a Gatlin-howitzer on the belly and anti-air missiles atop. And a spot to launch my little UAV’s.
26
posted on
10/05/2009 7:46:11 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(California : bankrupt ideas from bankrupt people from a bankrupt state now bankrupting America)
To: Reaganesque
27
posted on
10/05/2009 7:48:33 AM PDT
by
Iron Munro
(I carry a gun because Im too young to die and too old to take a beating.)
To: Reaganesque
Nice! The only thing that really bothers me is the single strap, centerline, between the operator’s legs ...
28
posted on
10/05/2009 7:52:46 AM PDT
by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: techcor
He also foresaw night vision goggles, heads-up displays and GPS. The first time I read “Starship Troopers” I thought “Man wouldn’t those be cool?” Now they’re reality.
29
posted on
10/05/2009 7:57:50 AM PDT
by
CholeraJoe
(Member of AARP - Armed And Really Pi$$ED!)
To: CholeraJoe
30
posted on
10/05/2009 8:00:19 AM PDT
by
Scythian
To: CholeraJoe
Don’t forget mechanical arms used to handle radioactive material were called “waldoes” for the longest time because of him.
31
posted on
10/05/2009 8:00:28 AM PDT
by
techcor
(I hope Obama succeeds... in becoming a one term president.)
To: ArrogantBustard; Reaganesque
Nice! The only thing that really bothers me is the single strap, centerline, between the operators legs ... That mechanical appendage thing hanging down?
It's called the "O'Donnell".
.
32
posted on
10/05/2009 8:01:49 AM PDT
by
Iron Munro
(I carry a gun because Im too young to die and too old to take a beating.)
To: Iron Munro
They could call it “The Emascualtor.”
To: Reaganesque
34
posted on
10/05/2009 8:06:14 AM PDT
by
The Comedian
(Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
To: Reaganesque
It immediately makes me think of the potential for a disaster situation like an earthquake. When you can’t really get heavy equipment in because buildings have collapsed in the street, this would be invaluable. Indonesia could have used it just a couple of days ago.
35
posted on
10/05/2009 8:07:18 AM PDT
by
JimSEA
To: Reaganesque
They could call it The Emascualtor. But for Rosie O'D wouldn't it actually be a "masculator"?
36
posted on
10/05/2009 8:19:26 AM PDT
by
Iron Munro
(I carry a gun because Im too young to die and too old to take a beating.)
To: EricT.
37
posted on
10/05/2009 8:44:41 AM PDT
by
mowowie
To: EricT.
"Let me know when they start building Mechwarriors." You "grow" Mechwarriors in Sibko's... ;) You "build" mechs... :) I will see your Madcat and raise you a Awesome! Yes I am a Mech junkie and Geek!!!
38
posted on
10/05/2009 9:03:54 AM PDT
by
Syntyr
(If its too loud your too old...)
To: techcor
I think Heinlein was first.He was, as usual...
the infowarrior
To: CholeraJoe
He also foresaw night vision goggles, heads-up displays and GPS. The first time I read Starship Troopers I thought Man wouldnt those be cool? Now theyre reality.In addition to "waldoes" (the original robotic arms) and oddly enough, the waterbed...
the ionfowarrior
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson