Shroud of Turin Reproduced by an Italian Scientist

Reuters ^ | October 5 2009 | Philip Pullella

[pantherskincreek]

An Italian scientist says he has reproduced the Shroud of Turin, a feat that he says proves definitively that the linen some Christians revere as Jesus Christ's burial cloth is a medieval fake.ntist Reproduces the Shroud

[Natural Law]

I’m skeptical. “Reproduced” is a pretty subjective term. To what degree was it reproduced and to wwhat level of foresnic investigation are the original and the reproduction identical?

[ejonesie22]

When he reproduces a human being from scratch call me...

[resistance]

So he proved is could be a fake. So what?

[Tallguy]

Logically, all this proves is how it might have been done if it were a medieval artifact. It can't prove that this was exactly the process. This is a demonstration, not proof.

[GeronL]

The headline is not supported by the article.

“similar” does not prove anything definitively

[Lawdoc]

Not replicated. The STURP team ruled out pigments on the shroud. This guy’s process used pigments which were left on his fake.

Funded by an atheist organization. Follow the money.

Nice try.

[ejonesie22]

Garlaschelli received funding for his work by an Italian association of atheists and agnostics but said it had no effect on his results.

Hum...

Shocking....

[ejonesie22]

Garlaschelli received funding for his work by an Italian association of atheists and agnostics but said it had no effect on his results.

Hum...

Shocking....

[HapaxLegamenon]

Is his image a true photographic negative?

[STD]

Your right Joneshie, he needs to bend over and grab a bunch of soil, rub it all together and produce a human being! Hell, then I'll worship him myself.

What a joke!

[Bob Eimiller]

Reproduced what.... ? ?

They didn't even have a CONCEPT of a NEGATIVE IMAGE in the middle ages. Atheists are funny... I wonder how many are atheists on their death bed.

[massgopguy]

Actually Leonardo Da Vinci was dabbling in optics and it is rumored that Leonardo, being no friend of the church, created the Shroud as a Practical Joke.

[ravingnutter]

This is a reproduced thread, there is already an ongoing discussion here with 241 replies.

However, just because this thread was reproduced by another source, that doesn't make it a fake ; )

[SoCalRight]

Whew! That was close. I was just about to believe in Jesus. Thank... well, Whatever, for the tireless work of the zealous nonbelievers.

[ejonesie22]

I wonder if the Atheist would fund the attempt...

Thankfully he will fail.

“In Garlaschelli we Trust” would require larger nickles...

[ejonesie22]

Thank... well, Whatever

I think the term is “Mother Earth”...

Or was it the “Great Pumpkin”...

Perhaps it was “Thank dumb luck”...

[reefdiver]

Baloney

[Servant of the Cross]

Luigi Garlaschelli, a medieval fake scientist, funded for his fake work by an Italian association of atheists and agnostics, says in effect, "God is Dead".

Luigi, prepare to meet Nietzsche.

[P-Marlowe]

Your right Joneshie, he needs to bend over and grab a bunch of soil, rub it all together and produce a human being! Hell, then I'll worship him myself.

Wait, he's got to first create the soil out of nothing.

[texmexis best]

...runs fingers along prematurely graying temples......

“I wonder if Opus Dei would answer some questions, hmmmmm?”

[ejonesie22]

I was trying to give him a running start...

To be fair he is up against much more powerful competition...

[Bob Eimiller]

I guess Leonardo was quite a dabbler. lol Optics is one thing, negative imaging is something else. Optics don’t create negative images. Don’t you agree?

[A.A. Cunningham]

A rumor which was debunked long ago.

[hecht]

“fake but accurate”?

[The Great RJ]

While it is possible to produce a similar image with materials available in the Medieval period, forgers at that time had no reason to make such an elaborate fake. In those times even a simple painted image would have sufficed, so why go to the time and trouble to produce an image that defied explanation even with 20th century techniques? Working backward to produce an image from an existing artifact would be quite different than a Medieval forger developing a technique from scratch to make such an image.

[applpie]

Can you imagine those medieval folks (who have nothing else to do) sitting around coming up with this one?

These guys are so enraged by any thought of God, that they will go to any length (or ignore any data they don’t like) to discredit this. But it doesn’t explain the plant evidence (which I heard from one team completely fits the plants that would have existed in that area during the spring season) and the shadows under the feet which one scientist found could only be reproduced photographically by suspending the subject off the floor.

[TalBlack]

Did he reproduce coins like the ones on the eyes of the figure on The Shroud, which ARE NOT visible to the naked eye? If he did this process he doped out is pretty damn sharp.

[MrDem]

Sounds like another one of those dopes that say they created “life” in a test tube.

[MrDem]

While it is possible to produce a similar image with materials available in the Medieval period, forgers at that time had no reason to make such an elaborate fake.

Not so quick... what if one of them had a prophetic vision of the big bucks you could get on eBay for the item?

[john in springfield]

While it is possible to produce a similar image with materials available in the Medieval period, forgers at that time had no reason to make such an elaborate fake. In those times even a simple painted image would have sufficed, so why go to the time and trouble to produce an image that defied explanation even with 20th century techniques? Working backward to produce an image from an existing artifact would be quite different than a Medieval forger developing a technique from scratch to make such an image.

You're correct.

[ex-snook]

Another one for 15 minutes of fame.

[Oztrich Boy]

The STURP team ruled out pigments on the shroud.

With Respect, that is like ACORN vetting elections for fraud.

[ApplegateRanch]

Latest round in the Shroud of Turin battle.

If the C-14 dating is correct (HA!) then it could have been created by 14th Century methods for some unknown reason.

The sponsor of this is a group of atheists and agnostics, so they have no axes to grind. /sarc>

There is another thread posted here

[SunkenCiv]

· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe ·
	Gods Graves Glyphs	Thanks ApplegateRanch. Pinged that other one, so I'm adding to the catalog, not sending a general distribution. To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
·Dogpile · Archaeologica · ArchaeoBlog · Archaeology · Biblical Archaeology Society · · Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·

[Scythian]

That’s it. Christiantiy is finished .... /sarc

[texmexis best]

Well you see we bolted an X-ray machine to a Lexmark printer and let it run for a few hours. Oddly enough, we ran out of X-rays half way through the project.

[frogjerk]

The STURP team ruled out pigments on the shroud.

With Respect, that is like ACORN vetting elections for fraud.

Do you even know anything about the STURP team and who they were composed of?

[frogjerk]

Investigators for the Shroud of Turin Research Project (STURP) included:
Joseph S. Accetta, Lockheed Corporation*
Steven Baumgart, U.S. Air Force Weapons Laboratories*
John D. German, U.S. Air Force Weapons Laboratories*
Ernest H. Brooks II, Brooks Institute of Photography*
Mark Evans, Brooks Institute of Photography*
Vernon D. Miller, Brooks Institute of Photography*
Robert Bucklin, Harris County,Texas, Medical Examiner's Office
Donald Devan, Oceanographic Services Inc.*
Rudolph J. Dichtl, University of Colorado*
Robert Dinegar, Los Alamos National Scientific Laboratories*
Donald & Joan Janney, Los Alamos National Scientific Laboratories*
J. Ronald London, Los Alamos National Scientific Laboratories*
Roger A. Morris, Los Alamos National Scientific Laboratories*
Ray Rogers, Los Alamos National Scientific Laboratories*
Larry Schwalbe, Los Alamos National Scientific Laboratories
Diane Soran, Los Alamos National Scientific Laboratories
Kenneth E. Stevenson, IBM*
Al Adler, Western Connecticut State University
Thomas F. D'Muhala, Nuclear Technology Corporation*
Jim Drusik, Los Angeles County Museum
Joseph Gambescia, St. Agnes Medical Center
Roger & Marty Gilbert, Oriel Corporation*
Thomas Haverty, Rocky Mountain Thermograph*
John Heller, New England Institute
John P. Jackson, U.S. Air Force Academy*
Eric J. Jumper, U.S. Air Force Academy*
Jean Lorre, Jet Propulsion Laboratory*
Donald J. Lynn, Jet Propulsion Laboratory*
Robert W. Mottern, Sandia Laboratories*
Samuel Pellicori, Santa Barbara Research Center*
Barrie M. Schwortz, Barrie Schwortz Studios*
Note: The researchers marked with an * participated directly in the 1978 Examination in Turin. All others are STURP research members who worked with the data or samples after the team returned to the United States.

A real ACORN Group for sure.

[Lawdoc]

I hope you forgot to add your /s designation!