Skip to comments.
Pelosi says new tax is 'on the table' [A new value added tax (VAT).........]
The Hill ^
Posted on 10/06/2009 8:43:42 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
Pelosi says new tax is 'on the table' By Michael O'Brien - 10/06/09 10:59 AM ET
A new value added tax (VAT) is "on the table" to help the U.S. address is fiscal liabilities, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said Monday night.
Pelosi, appearing on PBS's "The Charlie Rose Show" asserted that "it's fair to look at" the VAT as part of an overhaul of the nation's tax code.
"I would say put everything on the table and subject it to the scrutiny that it deserves," Pelosi told Rose when asked if the value-added tax has any appeal to her.
The VAT levies a tax on manufacturers at each stages of production on the amount of value an additional producer adds to a product.
Pelosi argued that the VAT would level the playing field between U.S. and foreign manufacturers, the latter of which do not have pension and healthcare costs included in the price of their goods because their government provide those services, financed by similar taxes.
"They get a tax off of that and they use that money to pay the health care for their own workers," Pelosi said, using the example of auto manufacturers. "So their cars coming into our country don't have a health care component cost."
"Somewhere along the way, a value-added tax plays into this. Of course, we want to take down the health care cost, that's one part of it," the speaker added. "But in the scheme of things, I think it's fair look at a value- added tax as well."
Pelosi said that any new taxes would come after the Congress finishes the healthcare debate currently consuming most lawmakers' times, and that it may come as part of a larger overhaul to the tax code.
The speaker also emphasized that any reworking of the tax code would not result in an increase in taxes on middle-class Americans.
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; agenda; bho44; communism; congress; corruption; cwii; democratcongress; democratcorruption; democrats; donttaxmebro; donttreadonme; economy; education; elections; glennbeck; government; healthcare; islam; israel; liberalfascism; lping; marxism; military; obama; obamacare; palin; pelosi; pitchforksandtorches; republicans; sarahpalin; socialism; socializedtaxation; taxcheatparty; taxes; tyranny; valueaddedtax; vat; veterans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-121 next last
Just swell.........
To: Sub-Driver
Would it be possible to defeat Nasty in the 2010 election?
2
posted on
10/06/2009 8:44:54 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Ask not what the Kennedys can do for you, but what you can do for the Kennedys.)
To: Sub-Driver
She wishes to see the destruction of the Great Satan and will do her bit to bring it about.
3
posted on
10/06/2009 8:45:25 AM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Sub-Driver
Why not simply tax anyone who votes against them? You know that is what they really want to do.
Sure, there is that pesky Constitution thingy, but that shouldn’t stop them.
4
posted on
10/06/2009 8:45:30 AM PDT
by
kennedy
(I'm a Kennedy with no experience or qualifications too! Where do I sign up for MY Senate seat?)
To: Sub-Driver
Somebody throw nancy in Boston Harbor.
5
posted on
10/06/2009 8:45:33 AM PDT
by
noblejones
(Obama rules!)
To: Sub-Driver
The good news is that since I make less than $250k I don’t have to worry about it!
/s
6
posted on
10/06/2009 8:45:41 AM PDT
by
RobRoy
(The US today: Revelation 18:4)
To: Sub-Driver
Bloody hell. These people need to GO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Last time I lived in the UK....the VAT was 17.4%. No telling what it is, now.
7
posted on
10/06/2009 8:46:30 AM PDT
by
RushIsMyTeddyBear
('They're drinking the juice.'~ Barack H. Obama)
To: Sub-Driver
Yup. No tax is too big and no outrage is too small for these people.
They really think our money is theirs.
Putzes on parade.
8
posted on
10/06/2009 8:46:41 AM PDT
by
RexBeach
To: Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allerious; ...
9
posted on
10/06/2009 8:47:05 AM PDT
by
bamahead
(Avoid self-righteousness like the devil- nothing is so self-blinding. -- B.H. Liddell Hart)
To: Sub-Driver
"I would say put everything on the table and subject it to the scrutiny that it deserves," Pelosi told Rose when asked if the value-added tax has any appeal to her.English Translation: "I've never met a tax I didn't like."
10
posted on
10/06/2009 8:47:12 AM PDT
by
kennedy
(I'm a Kennedy with no experience or qualifications too! Where do I sign up for MY Senate seat?)
To: Sub-Driver
Actually a VAT tax will really kill the economy. It is only paid if you buy something so the way to avoid the tax is not to buy anything. The underground economy will flourish
I think there is only one quality worse than hardness of heart and that is softness of head. - Theodore Roosevelt
11
posted on
10/06/2009 8:47:42 AM PDT
by
Patrsup
(To stubborn to change now)
To: Sub-Driver
VAT is only an option if the income tax is
12
posted on
10/06/2009 8:48:14 AM PDT
by
CPT Clay
(Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
To: Sub-Driver
The speaker also emphasized that any reworking of the tax code would not result in an increase in taxes on middle-class Americans.That's true, only if they don't buy anything manufactured in America.
13
posted on
10/06/2009 8:48:17 AM PDT
by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: Sub-Driver
The speaker also emphasized that any reworking of the tax code would not result in an increase in taxes on middle-class Americans.Well, there you go. Nothing to worry about.
14
posted on
10/06/2009 8:49:00 AM PDT
by
Fresh Wind
("Prosperity is just around the corner." Herbert Hoover, 1932)
To: Sub-Driver
Man, between raising the minimum wage and now a VAT, we’re going to end up with more jobs ‘saved and created’ than we know what to do with.
15
posted on
10/06/2009 8:49:02 AM PDT
by
tje
To: bamahead
The Federal government MUST be abolished! Return power to the people by straightening the states. Limit federal power or we will all be enslaved! WAKE UP OR GIVE UP.....
16
posted on
10/06/2009 8:49:06 AM PDT
by
April Lexington
(Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
To: Sub-Driver
If they tax her botox, she’s screwed!
17
posted on
10/06/2009 8:49:33 AM PDT
by
Harley
(Life is Tough, But It's a Lot Tougher When You're a Liberal. Stop Global Whining Now.)
To: dead
That is one seriously freakish looking face. Step away from the scalpel.
18
posted on
10/06/2009 8:49:38 AM PDT
by
hometoroost
(Time to bust the nut - stamp out ACORN)
To: Sub-Driver
That unpeakably poor excuse for a woman!
19
posted on
10/06/2009 8:49:55 AM PDT
by
Paperdoll
(Duncan L. Hunter, Where are you?)
To: Sub-Driver
The only tax I’ll support is a tax on rich Democrats like Pelosi. 100% confiscation sounds about right to me.
20
posted on
10/06/2009 8:51:00 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
To: Sub-Driver
It is becoming ever-so-evident that the Democratic strategy is to first get a signed blank check, then later shake down the funds.
Who pays the funds? It is I and thee.
21
posted on
10/06/2009 8:51:04 AM PDT
by
Sender
(It's never too late to be who you could have been.)
To: RexBeach
They really think our money is theirs.
We are their ATM machine (or so they believe).
22
posted on
10/06/2009 8:51:30 AM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: Harley
“I would say put everything on the table and subject it to the scrutiny that it deserves,”
Is that like the scrutiny for the unread health care bill or is it the scrutiny that was voted down for the posting of the bill?
23
posted on
10/06/2009 8:53:35 AM PDT
by
learner
To: Sub-Driver
Pass a VAT, and the state militias will surely march into D.C.
To: facedown
Liberals all drive foreign cars.
To: Sub-Driver
The main reason politicians love the VAT is most of the cost is hidden to consumers in the form of higher prices instead of the actual tax because it is levied at each stage of production. Say I buy a item for $100 at a retail store. The cost of item to the store might be $90 so at the register I pay say 10% VAT on ($100 - $90) = $10 so the visible VAT would be $1. The rest of the 10% tax is hidden in the higher sticker price of the item as those down the supply chain pass along the tax to those above them.
26
posted on
10/06/2009 8:55:00 AM PDT
by
C19fan
To: April Lexington; All
I smell the end of the Democratic Party ...


and the stench is overwhelming ...
27
posted on
10/06/2009 8:55:17 AM PDT
by
BP2
(I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
To: Sub-Driver
Them thars figthin' words. You think the original Tea Party was bad? You think the Tea Party protests were bad?
Pass this. You'll see what "bad" really is...
To: noblejones
Somebody throw Nancy in Boston Harbor.Trust me: it's polluted enough already.
29
posted on
10/06/2009 8:56:17 AM PDT
by
andy58-in-nh
(America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
To: BP2
Disgusting! Smelling the end of Bawny Fwank! Sheesh...
30
posted on
10/06/2009 8:56:22 AM PDT
by
April Lexington
(Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
To: Sub-Driver
does anyone really think the cost of healthcare will go down? When we levy several new taxes on it?
31
posted on
10/06/2009 8:56:24 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(California : bankrupt ideas from bankrupt people from a bankrupt state now bankrupting America)
To: Sub-Driver
For those that don’t know, a VAT is an insidious tax. It is levied on the value added by manufacturers to the materials they start with.
The consumer does not see this tax directly, they just see a price increase that is blamed on “big business”.
Calculating the added value is another area where a whole new bureaucracy is created to challenge companies’ self-assessed ‘value’ added to goods.
32
posted on
10/06/2009 8:56:35 AM PDT
by
Erik Latranyi
(Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
To: RushIsMyTeddyBear
imagine income tax plus VAT
33
posted on
10/06/2009 8:57:18 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(California : bankrupt ideas from bankrupt people from a bankrupt state now bankrupting America)
To: Sub-Driver
tax tax tax tax lie to people like they care=democrats
To: kennedy
Why not just dole out printed money to each according to their needs and ban private ownership of anything?
I wonder if a VAT tax would push us over 65% of GDP flowing to the government rat hole?
35
posted on
10/06/2009 8:58:44 AM PDT
by
listenhillary
(A "cult of personality" arises when a leader uses mass media creating idealized/heroic public image)
To: Sub-Driver
yes! Just ask them how much they LOVE the GST (similar to VAT) in Canada!!!
Every time you go to the register they tack on a HUGE amount for GST
and they just love it to bits
The ‘fair tax’ people won’t want us to see that number though- they prefer the ‘tax inclusive’ price for the goods- so you can’t quickly figure out in your head how much tax you are paying (is it 27% or 34%? - ITS BOTH!)
They will tell you it is “the way OTHER taxes are caclulated” (but not sales tax! they don’t seem to see that)
And if you add a VAT tax you only have to call it a tiny tax (like 2.1%) but you add it at each step of the process where ‘value’ is ‘added’ to a raw materials to make a finished product..
YOU WANT TAXES TO BE AS VISIBLE AS POSSIBLE!!!!!!!!!!!
I would be for scrapping the entire tax code and letting us live on 100% corporate tax- they stupid people will never realize they are paying the majority of it!
36
posted on
10/06/2009 8:59:34 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(THIS ADMINISTRATION IS WEARING OUT MY CAPSLOCK KEY DAMMIT DAMMIT DAMMIT!!!!!)
To: GeronL
37
posted on
10/06/2009 8:59:45 AM PDT
by
RushIsMyTeddyBear
('They're drinking the juice.'~ Barack H. Obama)
To: GeronL
Remember that sign from 9/12...this time we came without our guns. I think they better heed that one.
Vince
38
posted on
10/06/2009 8:59:45 AM PDT
by
Mouton
To: Sub-Driver
Peloser says lots of things ...
39
posted on
10/06/2009 9:00:37 AM PDT
by
Tarpon
(Oba-Mao is a reader, not a leader ...)
To: Sub-Driver
A new value added tax (VAT) is "on the table" to help the U.S. address is fiscal liabilities, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said Monday night.
Pelosi, appearing on PBS's "The Charlie Rose Show" asserted that "it's fair to look at" the VAT as part of an overhaul of the nation's tax code.
Horse Pucky! Ditch the ENTIRE tax code and replace it with
The Fair Tax. The current tax code is a rude dog that needs to be put back on a leash ... preferably one with a choke collar and
We the People holding on to the rope.
The Fair Tax is the ONLY tax revision proposal that fully funds necessary government while returning some semblance of budgetary control back to
We the People. Read up on it my FRiends -- NONE of us can afford a progressive income tax with a value-added tax imposed on top of it. We will only enslave ourselves to the rest of the world not imposing such tax liabilities.
40
posted on
10/06/2009 9:00:44 AM PDT
by
so_real
( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
To: Sub-Driver
VAT MASSIVELY increases government control over every transaction.
VAT is like socialized medicine, they would want that anyway. They would never trade it for income tax though. Marxism REQUIRES taxation of employment.
41
posted on
10/06/2009 9:01:49 AM PDT
by
chuck_the_tv_out
( <<< click my name: now featuring Freeper classifieds)
To: Sub-Driver; bamahead
I know this is a senseless question in this day and age, but how could a “VAT” Possibly be constitutional?
They needed an amendment for the Income Tax. Would that amendment also allow for a “VAT” since the 16th only provides for a tax on income?
42
posted on
10/06/2009 9:02:09 AM PDT
by
KoRn
(Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
To: BP2
43
posted on
10/06/2009 9:02:40 AM PDT
by
cranked
To: Sub-Driver
“part of a larger overhaul to the tax code”
larger overhaul=comprehensive tax code reform
Like `comprehensive immigration reform’ it seems that as
soon as they add a new tax/get amnesty you can be sure
they’re done with the overhaul/reform.
44
posted on
10/06/2009 9:02:59 AM PDT
by
tumblindice
(mmmm mmm mmmmmmmm)
To: Sub-Driver
The speaker also emphasized that any reworking of the tax code would not result in an increase in taxes on middle-class Americans.
lol lol....where is the tax money coming from....
45
posted on
10/06/2009 9:05:28 AM PDT
by
thinking
To: noblejones
Somebody throw nancy in Boston Harbor.
The resulting botox slick would devastate the environment for decades.
46
posted on
10/06/2009 9:05:30 AM PDT
by
EdReform
(The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed *NRA*JPFO*SAF*GOA*SAS*CCRKBA)
To: Sub-Driver
This is impossible because 0bummer promised no new taxes on the Middle Class.
A VAT is nothing BUT a tax on the Middle Class.
47
posted on
10/06/2009 9:05:45 AM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(Have you heard the rumor: Cass Sunstein is a Communist, Censor, Bet Wetter, and Holder's Butt Boy?)
To: KoRn
One can possibly argue it is an “income” tax beacuse it is taxing the income after costs each producer earns as a good works it way up the supply chain.
48
posted on
10/06/2009 9:05:51 AM PDT
by
C19fan
To: Sub-Driver
The ONLY way I would support a VAT tax is if all other forms of taxation were abolished, permanently.
That means no more federal or state taxes, no more capital gains taxes, excise taxes, fees etc.
Otherwise, NO DEAL!
VAT is a tax on everyone, including the poor. That might finally stop them (and the dems)
from constantly voting themselves more benefits.
But on the other hand I'm sure Pelosi will add a paragraph about reimbursing low income people somehow.
Redistribute and Control!
To: Sub-Driver
I would accept VAT ONLY if they do away with ALL other taxes. Since that will never happen, I am against it.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-121 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson