Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Audio: Safe schools czar wanted to illegalize restrictions of gay-friendly curriculum in schools
Washington Times ^ | 10/6/09 | Kerry Picket

Posted on 10/06/2009 2:23:45 PM PDT by paltz

As mentioned in the previous post, President Obama's "safe schools" czar Kevin Jennings addressed his former organization the Gay Lesbian Straight Education Network (GLSEN) in Iowa in 2000. Mr. Jennings spoke about the promotion of homosexuality in the public school curriculum as well as the inevitability of their (GLSEN) agenda winning. In the following clip Mr. Jennings discusses why he thinks it is important to have a pro-homosexual curriculum in the public schools starting in kindergarten

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: americansoldiers; bho44; bhoczars; bhohomosexualagenda; constitution; corruption; cultureofcorruption; deathpanels; economy; education; elections; fdrq; freedom; gayrights; gays; glennbeck; government; healthcare; islam; israel; justice; kevinjennings; latestnews; limbaugh; military; muslim; obama; obamacare; palin; patriot; politics; religion; rush; safeschools; sarahpalin; scotus; taliban; talkradio; teaparty; usmarines; veterans

1 posted on 10/06/2009 2:23:45 PM PDT by paltz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: paltz

Is “illegalize” anything like “outlaw”?


2 posted on 10/06/2009 2:24:54 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Don't tell 0bama what comes after a trillion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz; Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, ping


3 posted on 10/06/2009 2:28:12 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz

Yes...they want to illegalize kids lernitating that gayness is wrong.

Slouching toward Sodom.


4 posted on 10/06/2009 2:29:51 PM PDT by Dutchboy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz

Yeah, that’s it. The commie way. Destruction from within.


5 posted on 10/06/2009 2:33:34 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (Will America's worst Pre-sent in history be our last?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz

Get the GAYS out of our schools!!!!!!!!!!!! Get the Gay agenda out of our schools!!!!!!!! Get the Homosexual parents out of our schools!!!!!!!! Get the Gay legislators out of our halls of congress!!!!!!! get the gay judges off the bench!!!! Get Homosexual programs off our TVs!!!!!!!

Take back our heterosexual, nation under God!


6 posted on 10/06/2009 2:35:06 PM PDT by Integrityrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz; bamahead; rabscuttle385
Don't like it? Neither do I, but Republicans will have played a large part if this comes to pass.

Anyone who has ever been gung-ho about federalized abstinence education funding, or any other federalized funding of educational programs (drug education, for example)... well, this is what you've wrought.

All there is to argue over now is whether a specific program is a good idea or not, not whether the feds have the right to do it.

Allow me to take this moment to remind everyone that Mitt Romney is an enthusiastic backer of No Child Left Behind, which greatly expanded exactly this sort of federal expansion into education.

Expect to see much more of this regardless of who is elected, if the GOP decides to stay stuck in stupid and insist that their intrusions into state's rights are somehow different than the ones the Democrats do.

7 posted on 10/06/2009 2:42:27 PM PDT by mountainbunny (Mitt Romney: Would you buy a used car from this man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz

I also agree that schools should restrict gay friendly curriculum but sometimes people learn to accept gays when they have friends or relatives, its not always through indoctrination that they accept homosexuality.Nowadays not many want to be seen as bigoted :(


8 posted on 10/06/2009 2:47:43 PM PDT by lmarie373 (*These little guys might look cute and cuddly, but trust us: they will kill you.-on emanuel brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz

I perceive the imbalance of homosexuality. God created a woman to be a man’s partner in life and a man to be a woman’s partner in life. If nature intended just one gender, then we would all be creatures without gender. There would be no partnerships. There would be no Moms and Dads. There would be no need for children. Children could be sprouted like fruit off a tree. But that is not what God created.

They are prescribing that homosexuality is the in thing and the way to go. Take a look at holy Hollywood. Perhaps this all goes back to controlling the populations. Maybe it is intended to take people further away from God and Godliness and deeper into the darkness.

I am not asking anyone to accept my opinions. I do, however, ask that we pray for the children that are being forced into this mindset by government indocrination in the public school system and assisted by MSM TV. These kids are going to be so screwed up and as adults we should be empowered to do something, but the government is restricting parents more and more.


9 posted on 10/06/2009 2:53:06 PM PDT by fujimoh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

What a laugh, in the Clown Universe, this is code speak for “un-illegal.” You have to keep in mind “Liberalism is a Mental Disorder.”


10 posted on 10/06/2009 2:53:07 PM PDT by ntmxx (I am not so sure about this misdirection!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: paltz

I perceive the imbalance of homosexuality. God created a woman to be a man’s partner in life and a man to be a woman’s partner in life. If nature intended just one gender, then we would all be creatures without gender. There would be no partnerships. There would be no Moms and Dads. There would be no need for children. Children could be sprouted like fruit off a tree. But that is not what God created.

They are prescribing that homosexuality is the in thing and the way to go. Take a look at holy Hollywood. Perhaps this all goes back to controlling the populations. Maybe it is intended to take people further away from God and Godliness and deeper into the darkness.

I am not asking anyone to accept my opinions. I do, however, ask that we pray for the children that are being forced into this mindset by government indocrination in the public school system and assisted by MSM TV. These kids are going to be so screwed up and as adults we should be empowered to do something, but the government is restricting parents more and more.


11 posted on 10/06/2009 2:53:36 PM PDT by fujimoh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz

there are limits one heterosexual content in schools I’m sure. So they basically want to put anything they want out there, and no one can say anything!


12 posted on 10/06/2009 3:20:48 PM PDT by MNDude (The Republican Congress Economy--1995-2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Integrityrocks
Get the GAYS out...!!!!!!!!!

Strong words! Though I agree with you, I questioned that I am overly intolerant. I read your post to my spouse, then ask if it might be too extreme.

Response: "I don't think so." Totally agreed with you.

For what it's worth, can anyone explain why claustrophobia, acrophobia, agoraphobia, and maybe every other phobia is clearly defined as a abnormal fear, while homophobia is described as a contempt or fear?

13 posted on 10/06/2009 3:24:26 PM PDT by IIntense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mountainbunny
Great post.

Jennings is the "Safe for Pedophiles" Czar.

14 posted on 10/06/2009 3:39:21 PM PDT by elk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: fujimoh
...I do ask...that we pray for the children...

I question whether it is enough to sit back and do nothing about the problem, putting the solution on God. Not everyone sends their children to public schools and many find an alternative because they don't want their kids indoctrinated with liberal ideas.

15 posted on 10/06/2009 3:50:27 PM PDT by IIntense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ntmxx

Actually, according to Merriam-Webster.com “illegalize” is verb going back to the early 1800’s. Still sounds awkward, especially when there’s a perfectly good word like “outlaw” (verb, trans.) available.


16 posted on 10/06/2009 3:58:43 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Don't tell 0bama what comes after a trillion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lmarie373

I am an anti-sodomite bigot and proud to say it.

Homosexuals do not reproduce...they recruit.


17 posted on 10/06/2009 4:26:49 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (Democrats: the party of Slavery, Segregation, Sodomy and Sedition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lmarie373

I am an anti-sodomite bigot and proud to say it.

Homosexuals do not reproduce...they recruit.


18 posted on 10/06/2009 4:27:24 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (Democrats: the party of Slavery, Segregation, Sodomy and Sedition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Thanks, that’s good to know; was not looking at it as a formal/historical term.


19 posted on 10/06/2009 6:20:31 PM PDT by ntmxx (I am not so sure about this misdirection!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ntmxx

It’s not a word I have ever used nor one I ever will use.


20 posted on 10/06/2009 6:28:48 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Don't tell 0bama what comes after a trillion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

umm You misunderstood what I was trying to explain. In my post I never call anyone a bigot for opposing gays . Im just explaining that nowadays people accept homosexuality so that they wont be perceived as a bigot and that is not the way to change minds. I respect each others views on homosexuality, I have nothing anyone’s views.


21 posted on 10/06/2009 8:56:14 PM PDT by lmarie373 (*These little guys might look cute and cuddly, but trust us: they will kill you.-on emanuel brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: lmarie373
ooops I meant to put in the last sentence that: I don't have anything against anyone's views.

Doh!

I should revise my response more carefully before I post it :D

22 posted on 10/06/2009 9:12:18 PM PDT by lmarie373 (*These little guys might look cute and cuddly, but trust us: they will kill you.-on emanuel brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: IIntense
For what it's worth, can anyone explain why claustrophobia, acrophobia, agoraphobia, and maybe every other phobia is clearly defined as a abnormal fear, while homophobia is described as a contempt or fear?

Probably because it's a made up condition. Anyone who's against the radical leftist militant homosexual agenda is automatically a "homophobe". So if you have contempt for their agenda you're considered homophobic.

23 posted on 10/07/2009 10:51:58 AM PDT by YankeeReb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson