Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mary Cheney pregnant with second child
True Slant ^ | 10/06/2009 | Kate Klonick

Posted on 10/06/2009 6:17:42 PM PDT by DesertRenegade

Mary Cheney, the former vice president’s daughter, and her long-time partner, Heather Poe, are expecting their second child, a source close to the family told True/Slant. [Ed. Note: Since publishing this piece, Cheney has confirmed that she and Poe are expecting their second child in mid- to late November.]

Cheney has worked as a principal at Navigators Global, a bi-partisan communications firm, but recently announced that she would be leaving the company for maternity leave and to begin a new consulting firm with her sister, Liz. Close friends were informed that she was expecting a second child about four months ago and she is now visibly showing her pregnancy, the source says.

Cheney, a lesbian, attracted much attention from the conservative movement when she announced she was pregnant with her first child in late 2006. Social conservative pundit and founder of Focus on the Family, James Dobson, penned a controversial op-ed for Time magazine called “Two Mommies Is One Too Many,” opining Cheney’s decision to start a family:

"With all due respect to Cheney and her partner, Heather Poe, the majority of more than 30 years of social-science evidence indicates that children do best on every measure of well-being when raised by their married mother and father. That is not to say Cheney and Poe will not love their child. But love alone is not enough to guarantee healthy growth and development. The two most loving women in the world cannot provide a daddy for a little boy–any more than the two most loving men can be complete role models for a little girl."

(Excerpt) Read more at trueslant.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cheney; children; disgusting; homosexualadoption; homosexualagenda; homosexuals; ivf; parenthood; perversion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-116 next last
There is something quite perverse about a society that allows avowed and unrepentant homosexuals to unnaturally take on children as playthings. What a tragedy it will be for these poor kids to be deprived a father figure from the day they were born. I respect Dick Cheney, but I don't understand why he is allowing his daughter to take innocent children into her lesbianic home. Can anyone claim that these kids won't be scarred for life? So sad.
1 posted on 10/06/2009 6:17:43 PM PDT by DesertRenegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

At least Dick Cheney will be the Grampa. That should balance things out.


2 posted on 10/06/2009 6:19:15 PM PDT by ABQHispConservative (A Blue Dog Democrat is an oxyMoron!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

“There is something quite perverse about a society that allows avowed and unrepentant homosexuals to unnaturally take on children as playthings.”

Also repugnant, IMNSHO, is the use of “they are expecting a child” when, for obvious reasons “they” could not POSSIBLY have conceived. It is the slight of hand that the left does with rediculous name reversals (like “FAMILY PLANNING”) that implies something that in fact does just not happen...


3 posted on 10/06/2009 6:20:41 PM PDT by jessduntno (Tell Obama to STFU - Stop The Federal Usurpation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

4 posted on 10/06/2009 6:20:58 PM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade
"but I don't understand why he is allowing his daughter to take innocent children into her lesbianic home"

Since his daughter IS a grown adult, I doubt he has control over what she does, obviously.

5 posted on 10/06/2009 6:21:02 PM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

Actually, she should be referred to as the daughter of the former Vice President. Far as I can tell, she’s still his daughter...


6 posted on 10/06/2009 6:21:26 PM PDT by Hurricane Andrew (History teaches that wars begin when governments believe the price of aggression is cheap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade
but I don't understand why he is allowing his daughter to take innocent children into her lesbianic home.

It's not his decision since she's an emancipated adult. Mary Cheney is poorly exercising her free will which she will have to answer for one day.

7 posted on 10/06/2009 6:21:58 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade
Maybe because Mary & Heather are adults?

How much control do you have over your adult children?

8 posted on 10/06/2009 6:22:33 PM PDT by walsh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al baby

Was that on the cover of “The Rolling Stone”? LOL


9 posted on 10/06/2009 6:22:38 PM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

Cheney has confirmed that she and Poe are expecting their second child.. their? I thought her ‘partner’ is a female? Two females can’t create a child.


10 posted on 10/06/2009 6:22:43 PM PDT by Trillian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

When your kids become adults, there’s not one thing you can do about their choices. I don’t approve of these kids being deprived of a father in the home.

I respect Cheney for not trashing his daughter in public. It wouldn’t do any good, and it would be a betrayal of sorts.

As much as I don’t like it, God will have to sort this out in the end.

Our society has gone to hell in a hand-basket, no doubt about that.


11 posted on 10/06/2009 6:25:30 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Deficit spending, trade deficits, unsecure mortages, worthless paper... ... not a problem. Oh yeah?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade
Here's a picture of the proud parents...

I wonder if Hallmark makes a card for this occasion? Yathink?


12 posted on 10/06/2009 6:25:46 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Stop dissing drunken sailors! At least they spend their OWN money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade
Actually I find this sort of thing 10 times more abhorrent then the so called "Gay Marriage" since these people are actually imposing their lifestyle on third parties. The whole thing gives me the creeps---test tube babies and all.

Listened to a few priests in the last few months and I think they might be right--we are due anytime for a major @$$ kicking (chastisement).

13 posted on 10/06/2009 6:27:41 PM PDT by Fast Ed97 (Is it bad when you start to miss the Clinton years?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

I doubt that Dick Cheney is a controlling force in his daughter’s life, much as you and I, and probably he as well, would prefer that her life choices be far different from what they are.


14 posted on 10/06/2009 6:28:14 PM PDT by Elsiejay (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

A baby is a baby is a baby.

I hope Mary’s new baby is as healthy and happy as the first one.

Give glory to God for every new life!


15 posted on 10/06/2009 6:29:10 PM PDT by Palladin (ACORN is a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade
There is something quite perverse about a society that allows avowed and unrepentant homosexuals to unnaturally take on children as playthings.

But I'm not sure I'd want to live in a society that restricted pregnancy to only those it deemed worthy of having children. I'm not even sure I'd want adoption restricted in that manner. In this brave new world of Obama-ism, I'd be afraid that people not unlike many of us who post here would be told they're neither permitted to procreate or to adopt. ::shudder::

16 posted on 10/06/2009 6:30:45 PM PDT by Tidbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

“’they’ could not POSSIBLY have conceived. It is the slight of hand that the left does with rediculous name reversals (like ‘FAMILY PLANNING’)”

Exactly. The media casually reports she is pregnant, yet these homosexual couples have to use a whole series of bizarre test tube procedures in order to obtain their human play toy. There is nothing natural or loving about it. There are thousands of crying infants waiting for adoption, yet these two lesbians prefer to ‘create’ and then damage a newborn by denying him or her a father.


17 posted on 10/06/2009 6:32:05 PM PDT by DesertRenegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade
I think I understand the perversion.

I will never understand why it has to involve gestation.

18 posted on 10/06/2009 6:32:59 PM PDT by elkfersupper (Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

Even the sons and daughters of Republican politicians get on the gravy train and don’t get off, and have easy, conflict-free lives due to the virtue of their connections and name. This has got to stop.


19 posted on 10/06/2009 6:33:12 PM PDT by ikka (Brother, you asked for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Palladin

Bravo.


20 posted on 10/06/2009 6:33:39 PM PDT by MilspecRob (Most people don't act stupid, they really are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

Who is the father? Yes, you selfish lesbians, there is ALWAYS a father. Not that the baby will benefit from one. sick.


21 posted on 10/06/2009 6:34:23 PM PDT by montag813 (During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. -George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade
to obtain their human play toy.

Do you have ANY evidence at all that Mary Cheney and her partner view their child and unborn child as "play toys"?

You are being very reckless from what I can tell. I think most of us agree that having gay parents is not ideal, but you are seriously impugning Mary Cheney's character here and I think what you are doing is really sh*tty. I could be wrong, but I'm sensing this is more an attack on the Cheneys than it is anything else.

22 posted on 10/06/2009 6:37:51 PM PDT by KJC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade
"are expecting their second child,"

they are not expecting "their" child... Mary Cheney is expecting a child fathered by an unknown man... again. Does anyone know who the father of the first child is ?

23 posted on 10/06/2009 6:39:02 PM PDT by protest1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

now that’s LOL! funny!


24 posted on 10/06/2009 6:42:36 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: KJC1

“Do you have ANY evidence at all that Mary Cheney and her partner view their child and unborn child as ‘play toys’?”

It seems a common sense conclusion to me. Here you have two avowed and unrentant homosexuals who embrace that lifestyle. In other words it can’t be excused with “oh well, we’re all sinners.” These two are literally embracing the evil of a sexual deviancy. Then on top of it they bring two innocent babies into their home and instantly curse them with being fatherless for life. You have to ask yourself what is in it for the child to be fatherless versus what is in it for the two homosexuals to put these kids in a same-sex home. There is no other explanation than that these poor kids are being used to fill up some emptiness in the lives of the homosexuals - ie they are being used as playthings.


25 posted on 10/06/2009 6:43:37 PM PDT by DesertRenegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

“What a tragedy it will be for these poor kids to be deprived a father figure from the day they were born.”
_____________

Is this worse then Laura Ingraham adopting a baby to be raised by a single woman with a full time, day job, not to mention regular night time interviews?

I know that the “horse is out of the barn” when it comes to the mom and dad and “traditional” families, but just because it is common in the world, doesn’t mean conservatives should jump into the decline of the American culture. The example of Murphy Brown should not be practiced by those who propose to defend Family values.


26 posted on 10/06/2009 6:43:51 PM PDT by awake-n-angry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KJC1

“I could be wrong, but I’m sensing this is more an attack on the Cheneys than it is anything else.”

Not at all. That is the first thing that homosexuals always use to defend their lifestyle (that they are being attacked). There is such a thing as loving the sinner, but hating the sin. I wish all the best to Mary Cheney and her female sex partner. But it is tragic that she insists on forcing young kids to be raised in a homosexual household. In all cases, the welfare of the kids should be first, no matter how powerful or well-connected you are. Talk to any child who has been denied a loving father and you will find out the pain she is causing these poor kids.


27 posted on 10/06/2009 6:47:06 PM PDT by DesertRenegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Palladin
Ditto "Bravo", Palladin.

sw

28 posted on 10/06/2009 6:47:58 PM PDT by spectre (Spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Tidbit
But I'm not sure I'd want to live in a society that restricted pregnancy to only those it deemed worthy of having children. I'm not even sure I'd want adoption restricted in that manner. In this brave new world of Obama-ism, I'd be afraid that people not unlike many of us who post here would be told they're neither permitted to procreate or to adopt. ::shudder::

I'm with you. Would anybody be surprised if the next generation of liberals tried to slap restrictions on hetero couples, claiming some wacky discrimination because a 3rd party is necesary for them to reproduce? Does the idea of reproductive limits with government mandated abortions seem that crazy anymore (remember: more babies = more CO2)? I'm sure there's a way to deconstruct the Constitution for them to justify it with a straight face.

29 posted on 10/06/2009 6:48:12 PM PDT by cartervt2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

This should be made a criminal act- it is selfish and does emotional violence to the child.


30 posted on 10/06/2009 6:48:14 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tidbit
But I'm not sure I'd want to live in a society that restricted pregnancy to only those it deemed worthy of having children

On the road to diversion again I see.

31 posted on 10/06/2009 6:50:50 PM PDT by itsahoot (Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Palladin

Beautiful post Palladin. Thank you!


32 posted on 10/06/2009 6:51:19 PM PDT by PennsylvaniaMom (Rio 2016! Mmmm, mmmmm, mmmm!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Palladin

Beautiful post Palladin. Thank you!


33 posted on 10/06/2009 6:51:30 PM PDT by PennsylvaniaMom (Rio 2016! Mmmm, mmmmm, mmmm!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: awake-n-angry

“Is this worse then Laura Ingraham adopting a baby to be raised by a single woman with a full time, day job, not to mention regular night time interviews?”

Yes.


34 posted on 10/06/2009 6:52:31 PM PDT by jessduntno (Tell Obama to STFU - Stop The Federal Usurpation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

The guy’s got only one testicle.


35 posted on 10/06/2009 6:54:21 PM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (He or she that hesitate are lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

>> The guy’s got only one testicle.

Apparently that’s all it takes.


36 posted on 10/06/2009 6:55:40 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Stop dissing drunken sailors! At least they spend their OWN money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
I wonder if Hallmark makes a card for this occasion? Yathink?

Congratulations on your baster bastard?

37 posted on 10/06/2009 6:56:29 PM PDT by OpeEdMunkey (Eat right...exercise...die anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Alan Keyes explained it best:

Alan Keyes: “The definition and understanding of marriage is ‘the two become one flesh.’ In the child, the two transcend their persons and unite together to become a new individual. That can only be done through procreation and conception. It cannot be done by homosexuals.”

Alan Keyes: “And they are adopting the paradigm of family life. But the essence of that family life remains procreation. If we embrace homosexuality as a proper basis for marriage, we are saying that it is possible to have a marriage state that in principle excludes procreation and is based simply on the premise of selfish hedonism. This is unacceptable.”

Q: “So Mary Cheney is a selfish hedonist, is that it?”

Alan Keyes: “Of course she is. That goes by definition. Of course she is.”

Q: “I don’t think Dick Cheney would like to hear that about his daughter.”

Alan Keyes: “He may or may not like to hear the truth, but it can be spoken.”

Q: “Do you really believe that, that Mary Cheney . . .”

Alan Keyes: “By definition, a homosexual engages in the exchange of mutual pleasure. I actually object to the notion that we call it sexual relations because it’s nothing of the kind.”

Q: “What is it?”

Alan Keyes: “It is the mutual pursuit of pleasure through the stimulation of the organs intended for procreation, but it has nothing to do with sexuality because they are of the same sex. And with respect to them, the sexual difference does not exist. They are therefore not having sexual relations.”

http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/mostert/040904


38 posted on 10/06/2009 6:56:48 PM PDT by DesertRenegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: protest1
Is it any ones business to know ‘who the father of this child’ is?

I don't think so...I do not support her life style, but she is very capable and financially able to support children and there are many children in this world who don't know who their father is and not raised with a father in the home and they turn out just fine.

Dick and Lynn Cheney will welcome and love this grandchild just as they do all their other ones.

39 posted on 10/06/2009 6:59:05 PM PDT by haircutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: OpeEdMunkey

>> Congratulations on your baster bastard?

DAMN! I just BOUGHT that keyboard and now it’s all full of sticky adult beverage!


40 posted on 10/06/2009 6:59:36 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Stop dissing drunken sailors! At least they spend their OWN money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

*THEIR* SECOND CHILD?


41 posted on 10/06/2009 7:00:12 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Christian+Veteran=Terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

The Lawrence decision was an enormous mistake.


42 posted on 10/06/2009 7:01:48 PM PDT by achilles2000 (Shouting "fire" in a burning building is doing everyone a favor...whether they like it or not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: awake-n-angry

There is no comparison. Any more questions?


43 posted on 10/06/2009 7:02:58 PM PDT by achilles2000 (Shouting "fire" in a burning building is doing everyone a favor...whether they like it or not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: haircutter

“Is it any ones business to know ‘who the father of this child’ is?”

Yes, the children have every right to know who their father is.

“she is very capable and financially able to support children”

No amount of money makes up for a child who has been intentionally denied a father for life. My wife works with children and I can’t tell you how damaging it is for them not to have a father. Such things can’t just be smoothed over with cash. That is one of the tragedies of our anything goes society. I really urge you to seek out some fatherless kids and you will find out that they don’t take it so lightly.


44 posted on 10/06/2009 7:03:02 PM PDT by DesertRenegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno
“Is this worse then Laura Ingraham adopting a baby to be raised by a single woman with a full time, day job, not to mention regular night time interviews?”

Yes.

How? Because Laura isn't gay? Because her politics and lifestyle aren't repugnant? Either way the children in question are being deprived of a home with a father.

45 posted on 10/06/2009 7:03:05 PM PDT by Tidbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

Nothing against Ms. Cheney. I just think there is something not quite right with denying a child a father.


46 posted on 10/06/2009 7:04:34 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: achilles2000

It was an ultra-constitutional decision by a liberal court with “centrist” Kennedy in the majority.


47 posted on 10/06/2009 7:05:01 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Tidbit

“Because Laura isn’t gay?”

Yes. She might marry. I doubt the two Lesbian Ladies will.

“Because her politics and lifestyle aren’t repugnant?”

Yes. The child has a chance at a normal childhood and a MUCH better chance of doing well.


48 posted on 10/06/2009 7:07:00 PM PDT by jessduntno (Tell Obama to STFU - Stop The Federal Usurpation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Tidbit

I’ll go with “because Laura isn’t a sodomite and her lifestyle isn’t repugnant.” But, then again, there are so many degenerate behaviors that go along with the “lifestyle” that it is hard to choose.


49 posted on 10/06/2009 7:07:15 PM PDT by achilles2000 (Shouting "fire" in a burning building is doing everyone a favor...whether they like it or not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

I wonder who is the “father”? A turkey baster?


50 posted on 10/06/2009 7:11:46 PM PDT by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson