Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where's the Birth Certificate? ( Spineless Republicans & Hussein's ORIGINAL Birth Certificate )
wnd.com ^ | October 08, 2009 | Joseph Farah

Posted on 10/08/2009 6:30:31 AM PDT by kellynla

I've always liked and admired Rep. Michelle Bachmann, R-Minn.

In fact, I think she has so many of the ingredients we naturally associate with leadership – good communication skills, attractiveness, courage, convictions – that I have speculated more than once she could be presidential timber.

However, I've found a chink in the armor.

Apparently, she, too – like so many of her Republican colleagues in Congress – is deathly afraid of the Barack Obama eligibility issue.

Check out her recent appearance on CNN's "Larry King Live."

Do you believe Bachmann hasn't heard much from her constituents about the Obama eligibility issue?

All I can say to that is she must not be listening.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birthecertificate; birthers; certifigate; eligibility; obama; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-154 next last
To: marstegreg
Hey, Newbie...run along and quit bothering me with your inanities...it's quite obvious that you not only are ignorant of the subject but spineless on the issue.
51 posted on 10/08/2009 7:50:08 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Any truth to the story I’m hearing that Barry has over 30 SS numbers to his various names?


52 posted on 10/08/2009 7:53:12 AM PDT by Dewey Revoltnow (People don't respect that which they don't earn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Listen to the big man. I am so impressed.


53 posted on 10/08/2009 7:56:26 AM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Give it up, missy...you obviously have NEVER had to fight for your country on the battlefield...shezzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Have too!

Worked my way up from the bottom the hard way.

You are playing right into the media's hands and don't realize it. They are having a field day with this.

As for actual courage, name one courageous, risky thing you have done for the birth certificate issue. You are wanting her to do more than you have on the subject. What have YOU put on the line? And yet you expect her to trash her career just to validate your thoughts. Does the term "Monday Morning Quarterback" ring a bell?

After all talk is cheap!

And even cheaper is the noise you're generating.

54 posted on 10/08/2009 7:56:29 AM PDT by capt. norm (Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: old curmudgeon

Here’s what any conservative politician should say when mockingly asked if they support “birthers”:

” I don’t know where Obama was born. I do know that I don’t like the fact that he is spending a million dollars supressing all his personal information such as original long form b/c, college admissions/transcripts/theses, complete medical records, adoption records, passport records, selective service records, baptismal records etc etc. I don’t like the fact that nobody is directly asking him “why”. This information is available for all other presidents and it is disturbing that he is blocking the public access to his records.”


55 posted on 10/08/2009 7:57:12 AM PDT by klb99 (I now understand why the South seceeded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

“Pelousy’s fingerprints are all over this SCAM and that is why the GOP MUST DEMAND AN INVESTIGATION AND DEMAND HUSSEIN’S ORIGINAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE...”

You mean the same kind of investigation the Black Panthers got? How about the kind Charlie Rangle got? I don’t want that kind of investigation. Do you?


56 posted on 10/08/2009 7:58:03 AM PDT by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Rep. Michelle Bachmann, R-Minn. Ann Coulter too refuses to join the Birth-certificaters. Given that every legal case has been thrown out, they would get nothing for putting ‘crackpot’ next to their name. All’s Birth-certificaters have now is whining.


57 posted on 10/08/2009 8:01:00 AM PDT by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the government spending you demand stupid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: klb99

Agreed.

And then get onto something of immediate importance.


58 posted on 10/08/2009 8:01:28 AM PDT by old curmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
I want to talk about the issue of "Date filed by registrar" vs. "Date accepted by registrar" that concerns Obama's short form birth certificate.

The more I think about that issue, the angrier I get, because I now realize that the Obama camp tricked me and the rest of the American public into accepting a Hawaii birth certificate that seems to be worthless as a valid birth certificate. NOTE: A thread here back in July discussed this issue in great detail, but I think this is a good place to go over the issue again.

1. Factcheck.org: During the 2008 campaign, factcheck went all over the internet bragging about pictures of what they claimed was Obama's authentic short form birth certificate.

2. "Aug. 8, 1961, Date filed by registrar":If one looks closely at the factcheck photos of Obama's birth certificate, one sees the following at the bottom: "Aug. 8, 1961 Date filed by registrar."

3. What does that tell us?

4. For one thing, it tells us that the person who was the registrar in 2008 could not have been the registrar who filed the Obama birth certificate about 50 years ago in 1961. He probably was not even born then or he was just a baby at the time.

5. What it doesn't tell us is this: When in the past 50 years did Obama's birth certificate go from the status of "filed" on Aug. 8, 1961 to the next, more important and serous step of "Date accepted by registrar"?

6. That is, as I see it, there is no way that a birth certificate that was in the status of "Date filed by registrar" on "Aug.8, 1961" could still be in that same status in 2008 of "Date filed by registrar" , a period of almost 50 years, unless Hawaii officials are more incompetent that I first thought.

7. Again: When did Obama's birth certificate stamped with "Date filed by registrar" on "Aug.8,1961" turn into a birth certificate with the more important "Date accepted by registrar"?

8. Was it finally accepted by the registrar in the 1960s? 1970s? How about the 1980s?

9. So my question is this: Where is Obama's Hawaii birth certificate with the "Date accepted by registrar" stamped on it, because the Obama birth certificate that used to be displayed on the factcheck site with pictures obviously does not have "Date accepted by registrar" stamped on it?

10. As I understand it, when the Hawaii registrar stamps a birth certificate with "Date accepted by registrar", it is a very serious matter. That is, the Hawaii registrar does not stamp a birth certificate with "Date accepted by registrar" unless he is positively sure that the information on the birth certificate is correct and accurate.

11. So, Mr. Registrar, where is Obama's birth certificate, short or long form, that has the most important "Date accepted by registrar" stamped on it? Why are you hiding it?

12. DeCosta birth certificate: During the 2008 presidential campaign, anti-Obama computer and document experts brought up a Hawaii DeCosta birth certificate to try to prove that Obama's short form birth certificate displayed on the internet was a fake. You can go to google and look at it yourself.

13. I went back to the internet using google and found the DeCosta Hawaii birth certificate. I had examined it many times during the 2008 presidential campaign, so I was familiar with it.

14. Patrica DeCosta

Date of birth May 14, 1930

15. At the bottom of the DeCosta birth certificate:

"Date accepted by state registrar"

May 27, 1930

NOTE: During my search on the internet, I did find ONE Hawaii birth certificate other than Obama's that had "Date filed by registrar", but only one.

Also, it seems that the Hawaii short form birth certificates dated BEFORE 1985 ALL had "Date accepted by registrar."

To me, this means that because Obama was supposedly born in Hawaii in 1961, I would think that Obama's short form birth certificate that Obama supporters display on the internet should have "Date accepted by registrar" if it was legitimate and not a fake.

17. In other words, if I am not mistaken, that Obama birth certificate that pro-Obama people gleefully display on the internet is completely WORTHLESS, because it does not have the more serious "Date accepted by registrar" stamped on it.

18. Born in Hawaii? If you were born in Hawaii, does your short form birth certificate say "Date filed by registrar" or "Date accepted by registrar". The key here is "filed" vs. "Accepted."

19. If I am correct in my thinking, your short form Hawaii birth certificate will have "Date accepted by registrar" and not "Date filed by registrar." I hope that I am right.

20. Born in Hawaii: If you have a Hawaii short form birth certificate like Obama has and it has "Date filed by registrar" like Obama's short form has, I strongly suggest that you try to get one with the words "Date accepted by registrar".

21. And if you can't get one, I think you better ask Hawaii officials why your short form birth certificate has "Date filed by registrar" instead of "Date accepted by registrar." Good luck.

59 posted on 10/08/2009 8:10:43 AM PDT by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: old curmudgeon

“And then get onto something of immediate importance.”

The sad thing is that this IS of immediate importance...if HE is illegal then everything he is doing is illegal. I understand your position but it is frustrating as %$#@
that this is taking so long when it’s not complex. Even football knows when there’s an ineligible player on the field and it doesn’t take years to get him off.............this situation is ridiculous. I feel as though we are living in a parallel universe.


60 posted on 10/08/2009 8:12:51 AM PDT by klb99 (I now understand why the South seceeded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
"And what proof do you have?"

It's up to the birthers to prove their claims.

61 posted on 10/08/2009 8:18:24 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: john mirse

Thank you!


62 posted on 10/08/2009 8:18:44 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
The only chance I see of bringing light to the biggest fraud in American history is if some patriotic whistle-blower in the FBI or CIA blows the deal sky-high.

I agree, but the longer they wait the more the infiltration, pay-offs and intimidation can grab hold.

63 posted on 10/08/2009 8:30:25 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cheetahcat

Republicans lost because they Play nice with Snakes instead of just Clubbing them.
___________________________________________

Clubbing snakes...

There was this little girl who dressed in her nice warm winter coat and went walking in the woods one frosty day...

She came across a half frozen snake who called to her to save him...

Snake: Little girl, please pick me up and put me in the pocket of your nice warm coat..

Little Girl: But you’re a snake. You will hurt me...

S: Do I look like I could hurt you ? I’m half dead with the cold. I’d be grateful. How could you pass me by? Didnt you learn in Sunday school about the Godd Samaritan?

LG: Yes, i did learn about the Good Samaritan.

S: What did you learn?

LG: That we are to help everyone..

S: Well? Arent I an everyone?

LG: yes, I suppose so...

S: Oh, I feel faint. And I’m so cold...

LG: If I pick you up, you promise you wont hurt me?

S: Of course I wont hurt you. Snakes dont hurt people. That’s just a lie going around about us. I’d be grateful. I’d ber your friend.

LG: OK. I’ll help you.

(She picked him up and put him in the pocket of her coat. She continued walking and the snake told her funny stories. She began to be lulled into liking him. He seemed such a dear funny snake.)

LG: How are you felling? Are you getting warm now?

S: Oh, I’m feeling a little better. But I would feel a bit warmer if i was near your warm body. Please move me closer to your heart. Under your coat would be nicer. You know I wont hurt you.

(The little girl placed the snake under her coat by her chest and went on walking. Shortly she felt a sharp bite and blinding pain. She fell on the ground and as she closed her eyes near death)

LG: Why did you do that? I trusted you. You were my friend.

S: Silly little girl. I’m not your friend. You should never have trusted me. I’m a snake. Snakes always hurt people. Always have. Always will.


64 posted on 10/08/2009 8:43:42 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
I thought one of the active court cases challenging Obama qualifications named congress as one of the guilty parties for not vetting. May be why she does not address this issue.
65 posted on 10/08/2009 8:52:02 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: john mirse

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

My son’s 1974 Oregon forms..

The short form: “Certification of Vital Record” ... “Certificate of Live Birth” ...”Record filed”...

The long form: “Certificate of Live Birth”...”Date Accepted by Registrar”...

My daughter’s 1979 South Carolina forms...

Short form: “This is a certification of name and birth information recorded at this office”...”Date Filed”...

Long form: “Certificate of Live Birth”...”Date Received by Registrar”...


66 posted on 10/08/2009 9:05:22 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Neither party wants to touch the Birth Certificate issue because they have too much invested in the election / popular opinion manipulation process to acknowledge that the Constitution is superior to it.


67 posted on 10/08/2009 9:43:04 AM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: old curmudgeon

True it will no be solved in the short term but if he iws not legit then all he has done should be overturned after. The issue should still be pursued.


68 posted on 10/08/2009 10:10:31 AM PDT by Ratman83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

I agree


69 posted on 10/08/2009 10:13:39 AM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

I stand by my point ,,,, nobody in congress wants to be the first one to start the food fight .


70 posted on 10/08/2009 10:17:03 AM PDT by lionheart 247365 (-:{ 0bama's dream is an American NIGHTMARE }:-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Bachmann’s reluctance to engage on the NBC-Usurper is understandable and reasonable. She is elected in a district which is a “swing” district. See http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/house/33871694.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEyqyP4O:DW3ckUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUnciaec8O7EyUsl

What is not so reasonable is that more US Senators and Congressmen from GOP-lock districts have not engaged on the issue.


71 posted on 10/08/2009 10:22:12 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

A horrible performance by Bachmann.


72 posted on 10/08/2009 10:27:12 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Darkness has no response to light, except to flee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Poor quality Republican primary voters produce poor quality nominees, which make terrible officeholders. It’s a cycle.


73 posted on 10/08/2009 10:32:18 AM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana
“Republicans lost because they Play nice with Snakes instead of just Clubbing them.
___________________________________________

Clubbing snakes...

There was this little girl who dressed in her nice warm winter coat and went walking in the woods one frosty day...

She came across a half frozen snake who called to her to save him...

Snake: Little girl, please pick me up and put me in the pocket of your nice warm coat..

Little Girl: But you’re a snake. You will hurt me...

S: Do I look like I could hurt you ? I’m half dead with the cold. I’d be grateful. How could you pass me by? Didnt you learn in Sunday school about the Godd Samaritan?

LG: Yes, i did learn about the Good Samaritan.

S: What did you learn?

LG: That we are to help everyone..

S: Well? Arent I an everyone?

LG: yes, I suppose so...

S: Oh, I feel faint. And I’m so cold...

LG: If I pick you up, you promise you wont hurt me?

S: Of course I wont hurt you. Snakes dont hurt people. That’s just a lie going around about us. I’d be grateful. I’d ber your friend.

LG: OK. I’ll help you.

(She picked him up and put him in the pocket of her coat. She continued walking and the snake told her funny stories. She began to be lulled into liking him. He seemed such a dear funny snake.)

LG: How are you felling? Are you getting warm now?

S: Oh, I’m feeling a little better. But I would feel a bit warmer if i was near your warm body. Please move me closer to your heart. Under your coat would be nicer. You know I wont hurt you.

(The little girl placed the snake under her coat by her chest and went on walking. Shortly she felt a sharp bite and blinding pain. She fell on the ground and as she closed her eyes near death)

LG: Why did you do that? I trusted you. You were my friend.

S: Silly little girl. I’m not your friend. You should never have trusted me. I’m a snake. Snakes always hurt people. Always have. Always will.”

Snake's new definition is Democrat.

74 posted on 10/08/2009 10:56:01 AM PDT by Cheetahcat (Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: mlo
Yes all possible. In addition:

4. They want the issue to be decided in a court and choose not to politicize it.

5. They have enough battles to fight that they believe they can win or at least effect the outcome to spend time on the BC issue.

6. They have no more information than any of us here on these threads and, with nothing more than suspicion to drive them, leave the issue to someone who can do more.

7. They believe that leaving obama in office as he is is better than the "crisis" that might result from winning the eligibility issue and dealing with whatever outcome would result.

8. They are waiting to play the eligibility card when the time is right for them.

9. They believe obama is eligible, was born in the US and is a NBC regardless of his father's nationality or they believe Obama Sr. isn't really obama's bio-dad but his bio-dad is an American citizen.

75 posted on 10/08/2009 11:42:13 AM PDT by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

You are absolutely right on in your post 37. WHO the hell wants to risk their lives on the battlefield for a FRAUD who has no legal authority to put them there. In addition to that, this tyrannical traitor is actually undermining the Military. Time I tell ya, it’s time. There are what? Oh about 100 million armed people in the United States. You want answers - GO FOR THEM. Even the Supreme Court should not be exempt from DEMANDS!! This IS the most important issue of all because everything else is subject to it!! I guess there is only the United States of America to lose. Perhaps the place to start is at the Supreme Court. They have become just a little too big for their britches also imo. CO


76 posted on 10/08/2009 12:30:52 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (Conservatism is to a country what an antibiotic is to an infection - Healing!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

kellynla’s account has been banned. Pretty sure the ‘birther’ stuff is usually lefties trying to keep a failed debate alive.


77 posted on 10/08/2009 12:34:12 PM PDT by mudblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

Heh, or they wrote “banned” in themselves. I still think we should be careful when we see birther stuff.


78 posted on 10/08/2009 12:35:54 PM PDT by mudblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: klb99

That is exactly right. Personally I believe that there has to be outside, as in other country(ies) influence in this matter. The thing that STINKS the most to me is the Supreme Court. They have ONE Mandate and One only - to UPHOLD the Constitution of the United States. They are failing miserably and I it stinks. It deserves an answer and when a Military man cannot get an answer from a Federal Judge the Supremes should IMMEDIATELY take it up. There is something very sinister going on here and it is eventually going to HAVE to be taken up by THE PEOPLE together with their Military. It must be done before this army of scumbags completely guts the Military and forms IT’S own civilian army of armed thugs. Timing IS of utmost importance. CO


79 posted on 10/08/2009 12:42:26 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (Conservatism is to a country what an antibiotic is to an infection - Healing!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: mudblood

she isn’t banned FRiend. It’s a joke. I know, I asked her a bit ago. CO


80 posted on 10/08/2009 12:46:53 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (Conservatism is to a country what an antibiotic is to an infection - Healing!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage

Ya I started suspecting - you should see my face :) Feel kinda bad about it... Still think the birther stuff, even if it’s correct, is an anchor around the real effort to get rid of the commie in chief (coc).


81 posted on 10/08/2009 12:49:25 PM PDT by mudblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

That is what I think also. You have got to hand it to the right, take an issue that is one of the very few requirements for being President of US and call anyone who wants to see proof of it a quack and suceed?


82 posted on 10/08/2009 1:18:24 PM PDT by mel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

Thank you!


83 posted on 10/08/2009 1:31:41 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
“Given that every legal case has been thrown out?”

Wrong again, genius.

84 posted on 10/08/2009 1:45:38 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: mudblood

“kellynla’s account has been banned”

you’re not too bright, are you? ROFLMAO

(hey, genius, I wrote that)


85 posted on 10/08/2009 1:49:08 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Well that’s just plain funny!


86 posted on 10/08/2009 1:52:27 PM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

I know, my bad. I deserve the hate :) My apologies too.


87 posted on 10/08/2009 1:52:46 PM PDT by mudblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: mlo
And what proof do you have?

“It's up to the birthers to prove their claims.”

Wrong again, genius. It is up to the candidates to prove they are eligible to run for a particular office.

And since Pelousy enabled Hussein to fraudulently run for POTUS, she is equally guilty of fraud.

Try doing a little research before you make a total ass out of yourself.

88 posted on 10/08/2009 1:54:09 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: mudblood

“hate?”

I don’t “hate” you. LOL


89 posted on 10/08/2009 1:56:04 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Right genius, you cant even get Obama to have to go to court.


90 posted on 10/08/2009 1:58:41 PM PDT by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the government spending you demand stupid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

“you cant even get Obama to have to go to court.”

I don’t know what planet you live on but Obama’s attorneys have been making court appearances and filing motions for MONTHS...the last being this past Monday....with a trial date set for January!

The more you post, the DUMBER YOU SOUND...shezzzzzzzzzzzz...


91 posted on 10/08/2009 2:04:00 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: mlo

4. How come you only ask this question, when a black man gets elected?


92 posted on 10/08/2009 2:11:08 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg
The problem is proving it. If they cannot prove it, they cannot take it on. Believing it is not enough

There are two issues, one of which is only marginally related to the Birth Certificate. The BC issue is to determine if he is a citizen at all, or possibly a naturalized one. The other issue lies in the citizenship, or lack thereof, of his father. The BC would be legal proof of who his father was, but otherwise it could contain exactly what was on the image of the CoLB, and he still might not be a natural born citizen. There's really nothing to "prove", except in a technical legalistic sense. What is needed is a "determination". Much like the case of "Wong Kim Ark", where both sides agreed on the facts, but disagreed on the law (including the supreme law).

But it takes a court, including appeals courts and ultimately the Supreme Court to make that "determination". If no court will even examine the issue, declaring it "political" or that individuals have no "standing" to have the Constitution enforces, then the Constitutional meaning will not be defined, and the Constitution will not be enforced.

The BC issue is just easier to understand, no confusion between "(native born) citizen" and "natural born citizen" exists if he was not a citizen at birth at all or was but by statute, which means under Congress power to define an uniform rule of naturalization.

93 posted on 10/08/2009 2:29:49 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: El Gato; LucyT

I just received this so I thought I would add to the discussion.

- - - FLASH TRAFFIC - - - FLASH TRAFFIC - - -

United States District Court Judge David O. Carter
Case Number: SACV09-0082 DOC (ANx)
Captain Pamela Barnett, Et. Al. v. Barack Hussein Obama, Et. Al.
Date: October the 5th, 2009

Motion to Dismiss this Case: Denied

Motion to Set for Trial: Affirmed

Court Aforesaid Mentioned Now Orders The Following Dates to be Made Final:

1. Motion for Summary Judgment November 16, 2009
2. Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment November 26, 2009
3. Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment November 30, 2009
4. Final Pretrial Conference January 11, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.
5. Jury Trial January 26, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.

The above titled case in the matter of Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility to hold the Office of the Presidency of the United States of America will proceed to trial as outlined above. U.S. District Court Judge David O. Carter posted his adjudication. There was a Motion to Dismiss put forward by the attorneys representing the Justice Department and Barack Hussein Obama, which motion was denied.

The case as to Mr. Obama’s eligibility shall now proceed toward trial. This includes but is not limited to: Articles of Discovery wherein all matters pertaining to Barack Obama’s Birth Certificate, College Transcripts, Employment Records, Housing and Residence, Passports, etc. shall be subpoenaed and ordered to be brought forward for review.

The decision by this U.S. District Judge is profound on several levels. I doubt, however, government-run media will have any reference to this ruling or the actions pertaining to this case.

There is a clock ticking, and I can’t help believe Obama, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Read know there is a clock ticking.

Not only in the matter of Mr. Obama’s Constitutional legitimacy for the office he currently holds, but also because WE THE PEOPLE are waking to the reality our country is being taken away and recast in a mold counter to the Founding Father’s vision, our Heritage and culture, and the Rule of Law our Nation has stood on from inception.

There is a clock ticking in this law suit. So ramming as much “change” as humanly possible makes sense in the event sufficient evidence is found to proceed with Impeachment of the President.

I released an earlier Intelligence Briefing (March 16th, 2009) wherein I stated a Constitutional Crisis may be coming in the matter of Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility to hold the Office of President of the United States of America. The decision of U.S. District Court Judge David O.
Carter just moved our Nation one step closer to this very real possibility.

Respectfully,
LYLE J. RAPACKI, Ph.D.
Protective Intelligence Specialist and Agent
Consultant at Behavioral Analysis and Threat Assessment
Independent Intelligence Analyst and Licensed Private Investigator
ASIS-Phoenix Chapter Membership Chair


94 posted on 10/08/2009 4:29:58 PM PDT by azkathy (OBAMA IS WEARING OUT MY CAPS LOCK!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: azkathy; rxsid; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; GOPJ; BP2; ..
.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

. . . to #94.

95 posted on 10/08/2009 4:35:53 PM PDT by LucyT (Please Donate to FR. . . 10% donations first week = 70 day freepathon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Nice news. :-) But I’ll wait for confirmation.


96 posted on 10/08/2009 4:40:15 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

This part will be verrry interesting...
“The case as to Mr. Obama’s eligibility shall now proceed toward trial. This includes but is not limited to: Articles of Discovery wherein all matters pertaining to Barack Obama’s Birth Certificate, College Transcripts, Employment Records, Housing and Residence, Passports, etc. shall be subpoenaed and ordered to be brought forward for review.”

It’s for the children, Barry just let them see your college transcripts and what a cute little boy you were. You do want them to know, “Yes we Can!”


97 posted on 10/08/2009 4:42:05 PM PDT by azkathy (OBAMA IS WEARING OUT MY CAPS LOCK!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Is this confirmed?


98 posted on 10/08/2009 4:42:39 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Obama's Blackberry, who's on the other end?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: LucyT
The case as to Mr. Obama’s eligibility shall now proceed toward trial. This includes but is not limited to: Articles of Discovery wherein all matters pertaining to Barack Obama’s Birth Certificate, College Transcripts, Employment Records, Housing and Residence, Passports, etc. shall be subpoenaed and ordered to be brought forward for review.

Totally cool. And to those on the left reading this thread. Start your riots when your messiah is dethroned, suffer the consequences of blow back from the armed citizenry. Your choice.

5.56mm

99 posted on 10/08/2009 4:43:13 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: mlo

1. We are already tagged as nuts or worse.

2. They already call the republican party every name you can think of.

3. He isn’t a citizen, his father was British, so your guy isn’t a NBC. And the BC is a smoke screen issue.


100 posted on 10/08/2009 4:44:01 PM PDT by stockpirate ("And if my thought-dreams could be seen. They'd probably put my head in a guillotine" Dylan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-154 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson