Skip to comments.
USA Today to post 17 percent drop in circulation
Associated Press ^
| October 9, 2009
Posted on 10/09/2009 6:04:36 PM PDT by BradtotheBone
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: BradtotheBone
2
posted on
10/09/2009 6:08:47 PM PDT
by
Steely Tom
(Without the second, the rest are just politicians BS.)
To: BradtotheBone
3
posted on
10/09/2009 6:09:06 PM PDT
by
taillightchaser
(When a democrat says "The American people" you know the next words out of his mouth will be lies.)
To: BradtotheBone
I’ve noticed that even in airports, people are getting their news from their Blackberry or iPhone.
4
posted on
10/09/2009 6:12:48 PM PDT
by
JimSEA
To: BradtotheBone
The newspaper should be happy. Ecology. Less cutting to trees. Its a great thing.
5
posted on
10/09/2009 6:14:55 PM PDT
by
Lockbar
(March toward the sound of the guns.)
To: BradtotheBone
I'm working from memory but ... as I recall, USA Today and the Wall Street Journal were the only daily newspapers holding their own against the general decline in circulations. No longer. Of course, who would miss USA Today?. Not me.
But I wonder how the WSJ is doing.
To: BradtotheBone
I buy the USA Today on Tuesday for the high school sports. The columnists are like watching ESPN...bleeding heart liberals.
7
posted on
10/09/2009 6:19:06 PM PDT
by
Road Warrior ‘04
( I'll miss President Bush greatly! Palin in 2012! The "other" Jim Thompson)
To: taillightchaser
Im overcome with tears.
______________________________________
I have IBS just from the sheer stress of it all! Deary me!
To: BradtotheBone
Every day I read my brother at least one of their headlines that we laugh over. The paper has become a joke just like everything else in the MSM.
9
posted on
10/09/2009 6:22:17 PM PDT
by
HarleyD
To: InterceptPoint
WSJ is the only paper I read! Love it..subscribe!
USAToday is written at a 6th grade level...that’s most of Govt educated Americans...and guess what???They don’t read newspapers!ha/.HA!
10
posted on
10/09/2009 6:22:27 PM PDT
by
Recovering Ex-hippie
(Pray for Israel! And Georgia ! And the Iranian people! and Honduras!)
To: Lockbar
That’s right they’re going green. Isn’t it great and more trees. Makes up for the trees lost in the california fires and the cause, environmentalist.
11
posted on
10/09/2009 6:24:18 PM PDT
by
DWC
(what do kids know about)
To: InterceptPoint
I think WSJ is holding up better but I dumped shortly after Hussein was elected. Murdoch hired more liberal writers, WSJ was always pro amnesty and Taranto makes fun of birthers. I have zero tolerance anymore.
Forbes got dumped too because they have a column by one of Obama’s closest advisors and funders. Forbes helped make him rich and he is a lousy money manager. He was a key early fund raiser for Obama so Forbes helped get him elected.
12
posted on
10/09/2009 6:24:28 PM PDT
by
Frantzie
(Do we want ACORN running America's health care?)
To: BradtotheBone
I'm familiar with most of the major newspapers, NY Times, WAPO, WSJ, LA Times etc. I know where they are coming from politically. If the aforementioned publications were to go out of business that would be a good thing. But for the life of me I don't have a clue where USA today stands on anything.
Is this a another liberal rag or is it more middle of the road politically?
13
posted on
10/09/2009 6:26:06 PM PDT
by
truthguy
(Good intentions are not enough!)
To: BradtotheBone
USA Today is the newspaper that gets slipped under my hotel door whenever I travel on business. Other than that, I’ve never seen the newspaper anywhere else.
14
posted on
10/09/2009 6:35:04 PM PDT
by
SamAdams76
(I am 21 days away from outliving Laura Branigan)
To: taillightchaser
USA Today went radical Left wing. It started off pretty popular trying to appeal to the middle of the road in America. Not for long and now it is following it’s comrades into the gutter.
Watch the dems try to bail our their new propaganda centers when they try and push through the next “stimulous”.
To: BradtotheBone
‘WE SUCK IN THE USA’
Women and Minorities hardest hit
16
posted on
10/09/2009 7:51:06 PM PDT
by
OrangeHoof
(What's the difference between Obama and Hitler? Hitler wrote his own book.)
To: JimSEA
More up to the minute.
More accurate.
Less bias.
17
posted on
10/09/2009 7:59:37 PM PDT
by
Joe Boucher
(google; operation garden spot and REX84 (FUBO))
To: BradtotheBone
That would indicate that in the declining economy liberal morons (who would tend to buy USA Today) no longer have the spare change to buy a newspaper written with the written and sold for the sole purpose of reinforcing their ignorance.
18
posted on
10/09/2009 9:01:28 PM PDT
by
RavenATB
To: BradtotheBone
Boo.
Hoo.
Now, if they can only get rid of the CNN screens at every freeking airport.
19
posted on
10/10/2009 1:56:42 AM PDT
by
FormerACLUmember
(When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.)
To: BradtotheBone
Every hotel I’ve stayed in has given a free USAT every morning. I bet if they excluded those sales, their numbers would be near zero.
20
posted on
10/10/2009 6:48:13 AM PDT
by
CodeToad
(If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson