Maybe so.But in terms of a judge *overturning* the proposition (which seems very possible here) the pervs cannot be accused of discrimination,"hatefulness" or any other "sinister" thing.That's the key legal question here according to this scumbag judge.And given that the perv lobby is literally incapable of feeling shame or embarrassment they have *everything* to gain here and *nothing* to lose.
But they could be accused of anti religious discrimination and plotting to disrupt the nation by disrupting its families...should such smoking guns be found in their campaign documentation. Plus, the real backers of these Gay groups might not want their campaign contributions “outed” in plain site, including contributions from “sympathetic” judges! Has this judge in question been found to contribute to any of these liberal causes...? He might then have been asked to recuse himself from these types of cases!