You're gonna love my ................air.............
Posted on 10/13/2009 8:38:41 AM PDT by BornToBeAmerican
Dyson's Latest: A Fan with No Blades British inventor James Dyson—creator of the bagless vacuum and air blade hand dryer—has devised a cooling fan that uses 98% less power than air conditioning
For once James Dyson has invented something without cutting-edge technology – a fan without blades. With an eye on the lucrative US market for air conditioning, the creator of the bagless vacuum cleaner is launching his bladeless fan on both sides of the Atlantic today.
Instead of pushing coolness around a room, the loop of the Dyson Air Multiplier "accelerates and amplifies" air, expelling 405 litres a second.
(Excerpt) Read more at businessweek.com ...
If you constructed a series of these rings, all surrounding a single point, would you have a Dyson Sphere?
I have a Dyson vacuum - the yellow one. Hands down the best vacuum I have ever owned.
>> the loop of the Dyson Air Multiplier “accelerates and amplifies” air, expelling 405 litres a second
[yawn] Big deal.
I have a *colon* that does that.
A pdf linked in the article can be found here:
http://www.independent.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00250/Dyson_Air_Multiplie_250177a.pdf
It explains how it works in pictures.
You're gonna love my ................air.............
I don't think so.
Box fan - $25
Dyson air multiplier - $300
I’ll go for the box fan.
>> chest-chilling chill of air conditioning
They should shop around for a new copywriter.
Nothing new here except the packaging. And, yes, there are blades.
>> Still, in a hot room, aren’t you still just pushing warm air around like you would with an ordinary $13 box fan?
Not only that, but an A/C takes out humidity, whereas the Dyson thingie just takes out a second mortgage on your house.
>> And, yes, there are blades.
Uh UH! They’re called “whirling inducement airfoils”.
It still has an impeller. Can someone explain?
Indeed, it does sound interesting.
The difference is that some people are willing to pay $300 to let the Dyson expel air in their face.
>> The difference is that some people are willing to pay $300 to let the Dyson expel air in their face.
Yeah, I see your point. I have to tie my victims to a post, and they darn sure don’t pay for it.
It is in effect a centrifugal blower with an odd-shaped discharge.
You might be able to run a generator off of that...
Ping!
Regarding the PDF, in stage one I see blades.
Dyson did not invent the bagless vacuum.
That honor belongs to Filter Queen.
800 cfm if I figure right, that’s enough air for evap cooling; while it won’t eliminate A/C it may allow cheap douchebag bosses to raise the temp setting and give the whiners these units. I don’t think a box fan pushes this much air or at this velocity.
Dyson more correctly put industrial dust collection technology into a home package.
>> You might be able to run a generator off of that...
I suspect that it’s not very rich in hydrocarbons, because unlike everyone else’s, mine doesn’t seem to stink. :-)
I noticed that too. To be fair, it may not be truly bladeless, but it may be much more efficient than other fans.
I hear their vacuum cleaner is amazing, but my $100 one (also bagless) has served us great for about ten years now.
On the Dyson drawing board: A car with no wheels, gets 10,000 miles to the gallon, costs 50 million dollars.
sounds nipply
I’ll go for the box fan.
But, based on the energy savings, it pays for itself in about 150 years...
>> sounds nipply
You’re hired! When can you start?
lol,it was too easy.
I saw a review in either gizmodo.com or engadget.com that this fan (which does have blades, just hidden in the base), doesn’t put out as much air as a conventional fan of the same size and is somewhat noisy. I’ll wait for more reviews before buying one.
Actually it looks fairly clever to me. Probaly will go for 24.95 at Walmart.
LMAO
I’ll admit I didn’t read the article but a fan is not an air conditioner. If you need to actually lower the air temperature especially if it’s hot out, fan is not going to cut it. A rickshaw is probably more ecological than my car but odds are i’ll be late for work.
Yes, the real innovation is a 100,000 rpm electric motor that drives a turbine compressor. That IS impressive.
>>Yes, the real innovation is a 100,000 rpm electric motor that drives a turbine compressor. That IS impressive.<<
I’ll say!
“”800 cfm if I figure right, that’s enough air for evap cooling;””
12 inch fan at 1100 rpm does 1200 CFM
http://www.rewci.com/poatvewith.html
Cheap $20 20 inch box fan probably puts out 3-4000 CFM
you can not have engineers in the marketing loop, their love of nifty ideas very rarely translates into sales/profits
That’s the problem. You can hardly buy a 300 hundred dollar fan.
I have one of the vacumns. They are great; but the Rainbow is still number one. Really takes the crap up and out of the air.
On the Dyson drawing board: A car with no wheels, gets 10,000 miles to the gallon, costs 50 million dollars.
So, it’s a GM-UAW product then.
On the Dyson drawing board: A car with no wheels, gets 10,000 miles to the gallon, costs 50 million dollars.
So, it’s a GM-UAW product?
I guess he's qualifying it as "no blades exposed"
I’m holding out for one that drives a roots blower.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.