Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tentative Inspection Program Would Allow Russia to Visit U.S. Nuclear Sites
Fox News ^ | October 13, 2009 | Fox News

Posted on 10/13/2009 10:42:13 AM PDT by JimSEA

Russia and the United States have tentatively agreed to a weapons inspection program that would allow Russians to visit nuclear sites in America to count missiles and warheads.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhofascism; bhotreason; breaking; clinton; democrats; nuclear; obama; omg; reddawn; reddawnii; russia; surrender; tm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
I don't see anything on U. S. inspections of Russian sites. It must be there somewhere, no one could be this stupid without at least the cover of Russian promises of our inspections of their sites. Would they??
1 posted on 10/13/2009 10:42:14 AM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JimSEA
No, they wouldn't be THAT stupid. I presume they wouldn't be stupid enough to allow Iran to inspect US Nuke sites.

Or... Would they?

2 posted on 10/13/2009 10:44:48 AM PDT by C210N (A patriot for a Conservative Renaissance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

Yes we can be that stupid. We scrapped plans for missile defense in Europe and asked for nothing in return didn’t we?

Russia is playing us like a drum.


3 posted on 10/13/2009 10:45:39 AM PDT by GeronL ("On my twelfth day in office, Nobel nominated me..")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Well, they have do have a man on the inside.


4 posted on 10/13/2009 10:48:25 AM PDT by chuck_the_tv_out ( <<< click my name: now featuring Freeper classifieds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA
Last I checked there are still no give on sanctions for Iran and I missed the part where we were inspecting their military might.

Some of the story must have gotten cut off. There was nothing in there about the quid pro quo. A negotiation is generally about an exchange of something. What did our great leader get for us in return for our showing our privates.

5 posted on 10/13/2009 10:49:43 AM PDT by Tenacious 1 (Government For the People - an obviously concealed oxymoron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

You know, there for a while I was thinking that Hillary was smarter than this, but I was wrong. She is going along with this farce with eyes wide open. We are going to wake up one day soon surrounded, disarmed and defenseless.


6 posted on 10/13/2009 10:50:34 AM PDT by mapmaker77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

If there is reciprocity in the inspection protocol,I have NO problems with the agreement.


7 posted on 10/13/2009 10:52:40 AM PDT by puppypusher (The world is going to the Dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C210N

Unfortunately, this isn’t new or even Democrat stupidity. We invited senior Chinese military officials to the Pentagon, basically gave them the keys to the kingdom and got nothing in return. Oh, sorry - at the unclassified level (for my buddies on the MI Ping List) they got lots of illegal inside information on our latest weapons systems (JTF and F-22) by cyber-espionage from China WHILE their senior officials were visiting the Pentagon.

We’ve been played for fools in four consecutive administrations, and it’s sickening.

Colonel, USAFR


8 posted on 10/13/2009 10:55:50 AM PDT by jagusafr (Kill the red lizard, Lord! - nod to C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: puppypusher

we operate observation posts in Russia - every so oftem I see ad on Dice for EE’s who can deploy for 3 years and live
on an isolated post. whether they are for missile launch verification or nuclear material verification is unknown.


9 posted on 10/13/2009 10:56:27 AM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mapmaker77
"there for a while I was thinking that Hillary was smarter than this"

Why? What possible reason would you have to think that, other than random hope?
10 posted on 10/13/2009 10:59:35 AM PDT by chuck_the_tv_out ( <<< click my name: now featuring Freeper classifieds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA
The Russians have been inspecting Vandenberg AFB since the early 1970s as a result of the SALT Treaty. I know the inspections are reciprocal but I don't know which Russian sites we inspect.

This is not a new concept......

11 posted on 10/13/2009 10:59:41 AM PDT by Ben Mugged (Unions are the storm troopers of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

Holy CRAP, what next!!!


12 posted on 10/13/2009 11:04:07 AM PDT by blondee123 (Welcome to life under Obama Bin Lyin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

This is yet another WTF story...


13 posted on 10/13/2009 11:13:24 AM PDT by Lucky9teen (America is at that awkward stage..2 late 2 work within the system, but 2 early 2 shoot the bastards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

Even is the inspections are reciprocal, which may be the case, there is no indication as to what the Russians have given up in exchange for this “deepening” of penetration in America. Also, any agreement with Russia alone ignores the very real problems in China and the emerging nuclear powers. These are not new objections either.


14 posted on 10/13/2009 11:18:57 AM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

U F B


15 posted on 10/13/2009 11:26:08 AM PDT by ▀udda▀udd (7 days - 7 ways Guero >>> with a floating, shifting, ever changing persona.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

This is just beyond the pale.


16 posted on 10/13/2009 11:28:49 AM PDT by bustinchops (Teddy ("The Hiccup") Kennedy - the original water-boarder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

How can anyone not think Obama is deliberately destroying America?

What is it going to take???


17 posted on 10/13/2009 11:41:18 AM PDT by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jagusafr

Rhetorical question - When does this get to the point where it is considered treason? Who decides when the line has been crossed that an administration is working with the enemy to undermine our national security? (I mean beyond just our opinion as conservatives, - to the point where serious steps must be taken?)


18 posted on 10/13/2009 11:57:36 AM PDT by boxlunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: boxlunch

It’s far past that point now.


19 posted on 10/13/2009 12:10:09 PM PDT by darkangel82 (I don't have a superiority complex, I'm just better than you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

Kidding, right..?


20 posted on 10/13/2009 12:18:57 PM PDT by JSDude1 (www.wethepeopleindiana.org (Tea Party Member-Proud), www.travishankins.com (R- IN 09 2010!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson