Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red in Blue PA

If he can prove the drop was directly related to the libel from people like Sharpton, Matthews, etc, he now can show a direct monetary damage which could reinforce a nice, fat lawsuit.


6 posted on 10/14/2009 1:12:54 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: mnehring

The only way to get some people to not do this kind of lying is to make them pay dearly for it.

How great would it be for Rush to win such a lawsuit, and then use all that money donating it to various worthy charities and some conservative campaigns against RINOs like Snowe, Grahamnesty and McCain.


40 posted on 10/14/2009 1:19:30 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

“If he can prove the drop was directly related to the libel from people like Sharpton, Matthews, etc, he now can show a direct monetary damage which could reinforce a nice, fat lawsuit.”
__________

The left would be drooling all over themselves to get Rush under oath in discovery. Rush does not want to go under oath to answer questions about Oxycontin, Viagra, marriages, divorces and draft deferment and anything else that they could use as a smear.


46 posted on 10/14/2009 1:20:41 PM PDT by awake-n-angry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

Bingo! A suit could put Jackson and Sharpton out of bidness. I’m all for it. I agree with your comment about grounds too. Love it.


238 posted on 10/14/2009 3:20:13 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Deficit spending, trade deficits, unsecure mortages, worthless paper... ... not a problem. Oh yeah?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

I agree. Sue ‘em all...big time, and for the earnings he could have made as an owner. Sue them out of existence, tie them up in court for DECADES.


240 posted on 10/14/2009 3:22:10 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring
"If he can prove the drop was directly related to the libel from people like Sharpton, Matthews, etc, he now can show a direct monetary damage which could reinforce a nice, fat lawsuit."

And I'd love to see him do so, but I fear that he is just too classy to take that dip.

263 posted on 10/14/2009 3:49:36 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bomb-a administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring
I would not be surprised that Sharpton, Jackson and Matthews could be named as accessories in a lawsuit. And the discovery process could be an UGLY one indeed.
419 posted on 10/14/2009 7:11:34 PM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson