Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oregon Apartment Complex Bans Flying the American Flag
Foxnews ^ | Oct 14, 2009 | Foxnews

Posted on 10/15/2009 6:16:05 AM PDT by Psalm_2

An Oregon apartment complex is banning its residents from flying American flags, not only from their dwellings but also their vehicles, KATU in Portland reported.....

Sharron White, a long-time resident, was told by management to take down the flag she's flown on her car for eight years because "someone might get offended."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: americanflag; banned; hoa; oldglory; oregon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: PeteB570
Right before I made this post there was two stories about how 3 of the 5 on the NPP committie were against giving it to Obama. Look for that story to be posted about once every half hour for the next 8 hours or so.

Really! I was unaware of that story. Thank you for mentioning it. I'm glad to hear it's widely available so I don't have to trust my ability to stumble over it in the list of other stories. My thanks to whoever is keeping it visible!

YMMV.

21 posted on 10/15/2009 7:08:52 AM PDT by ExGeeEye (Keep your powder dry, and your iron hidden.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ExGeeEye

Maybe you should try reading FR before posting on it.

You might learn something.


22 posted on 10/15/2009 7:18:30 AM PDT by PeteB570 (NRA - Life member and Black Rifle owner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sassy steel magnolia

There likely was no one offended by the flag, except those who wanted to exercise authority over their neighbors from their vaunted position as keepers of the park’s dignity. They picked the wrong item for their perverse decency.


23 posted on 10/15/2009 7:24:38 AM PDT by Louis Foxwell (He is the son of soulless slavers, not the son of soulful slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ExGeeEye

And since you like to post without checking the forum you might want to start a thread about this story.

http://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/troop_funds_diverted/2009/10/15/272556.html

“U.S. Troop Funds Diverted to Pet Projects”

“....Senators diverted $2.6 billion in funds in a defense spending bill to pet projects largely at the expense of accounts that pay for fuel, ammunition and training for U.S. troops, including those fighting wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, according to an analysis.....”

This story seems to have been sliding along below the RADAR for a while.


24 posted on 10/15/2009 7:26:46 AM PDT by PeteB570 (NRA - Life member and Black Rifle owner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570
And since you like to post without checking the forum...

Please post a link to where I did that.

25 posted on 10/15/2009 7:28:47 AM PDT by ExGeeEye (Keep your powder dry, and your iron hidden.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ExGeeEye

“....Really! I was unaware of that story. Thank you for mentioning it.....”

Your post #21.


26 posted on 10/15/2009 7:38:11 AM PDT by PeteB570 (NRA - Life member and Black Rifle owner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570

I sincerely ask your pardon. I thought you meant “post [an article] without reading”, not “post [a comment] without reading.” I reacted as I did because I have not posted an article in a long time, and when I do, I search for similar articles first. While I really do appreciate repeat postings of articles (I usually don’t have the time to read the whole page), I don’t want to cause them.


27 posted on 10/15/2009 1:07:45 PM PDT by ExGeeEye (Keep your powder dry, and your iron hidden.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ExGeeEye

I am like you and start very, very few threads. Why? Because 99.9% of the time somebody else has posted it.

When I log into FR I click on News / Activism and pull down scanning the front page (around 50 threads/stories).

It takes about 2 hours to cycle a story off the front page - less if a lot is going on.

People on FR are pretty sharp and not much slips by them. But what is News? That story I linked to you above is not “News” yet but you would think a story about taking money from Operations & Maintenence and using it for Pork would have twitched a few more whiskers of the FR Cats.

So far I could only find where it was posted once with limited views. Oh, well.

Anyway, starting a thread on a day old story that had been resolved by the time you post it is not news - unless you also post that it has been resolved

and

I just wish more people would pull through the front page before starting a thread. It looks a little funny when there is 5 threads on the same story posted about 5 minutes apart.

OK, I’m just venting a bit today.


28 posted on 10/15/2009 1:42:13 PM PDT by PeteB570 (NRA - Life member and Black Rifle owner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Psalm_2
i suppose i should have looked further into into it before i posted. however the trampling of free speech is rather annoying.

First of all...I want to say this is NOT a free speech issue. The 1st Amendment protects us from CONGRESS making laws that infring on our freedoms of speech and religion. The Supreme Court has since stated that the 1st Amendment also applies to the States and local governments.

So...neither the Federal, State or Local government can make any infringment upon your right to exercise your freedoms of religion or speech.

An apartment complex is not the government. They have every right to be idiots...and be wrong. They have every right to suffer all the consequences of boycots...getting sued if they evict you or sueing them for any other reason you can think of (civil suit)...etc for making such an un-patriotic policy. They have every right to become the object of scorn and ridicule...

BUT the 1st Amendment GUARANTEES their right to do this...and the 1st does not prohibit them (a private business) from taking this action...and it is NOT a violation of ANYONE'S 1st Amendment right to free speech.

Its just slimey...and stupid.

29 posted on 10/15/2009 1:55:07 PM PDT by NELSON111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Psalm_2

Some corporate mouth piece needs some street justice to find out why it is ass.... don’t abuse their power like this in the US. Because they do not face street justice, fascism in on the move.


30 posted on 10/15/2009 4:01:44 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson