Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck
"I think you meant to say “reversible.” What is evident is that as recently as 2005, the Supreme Court affirmed the body of Commerce Clause jurisprudence, and was joined by the second most “originalist” justice on the bench. If you don’t comprehend what that means, then you don’t understand the judiciary."

Thanks...you made my point for me...you knew what I meant because it is true...and what does my comprehension have to do with this?

Honest answer, now;

True or false; this is not irreversible.

21 posted on 10/16/2009 9:03:31 AM PDT by jessduntno (Tell Obama to STFU - Stop The Federal Usurpation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: jessduntno

You’re confused, and playing word games. Is it reversible in theory? Yes. Is it reversible in reality, in practice? No. We’re stuck with it.


24 posted on 10/16/2009 9:06:23 AM PDT by Huck ("He that lives on hope will die fasting"- Ben Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson