Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RNC wades into New York special election [backs RINO with massive funds]
The Hill, Washington, DC ^ | 2009-10-16 | Reid Wilson

Posted on 10/16/2009 10:50:33 AM PDT by rabscuttle385

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-164 next last
To: MNJohnnie; rabscuttle385
Why do you spend 100% of your time here propagandizing for the Democrat Party?

Jesus Johnnie, he just told you in Post #64.
Go back on your meds

121 posted on 10/17/2009 8:12:16 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (90% of the fedgov is unconstitutional. The other 10% besides the military doesnt know what it's doin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
If you don't like the choice, go out and run a real conservative in the primaries and win.

So the RNC establishment can still back the RINO, even though they should butt out of the primaries and let the base decide?

Otherwise, shut up or go form a third party.

So you can blame them for the RINO defeat in the general? You don't want our votes in the primaries, but we sure as Hell better vote for the RINO in the general.

Whining is for losers and more and more the nutcases on FR are all about whining and losing at the same time.

Our nation is being destroyed by Marxists in the Democrat Party and by their enablers in the GOP. Should we just STFU and enjoy our tea and crumpets?

122 posted on 10/17/2009 8:21:57 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (90% of the fedgov is unconstitutional. The other 10% besides the military doesnt know what it's doin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

No money to RNC. Grassroots money to individual conservative candidates.


123 posted on 10/17/2009 8:26:23 AM PDT by egannacht (Vote YES for statism: Why burden yourself with civic duty when Idol and Oprah are on?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy
...she's been backed in the past by the Acorn-supported Working Families Party.

The NY Conservative party says Dede was 15% conservative last year (several rats in the leg did better).

Your full post is mostly correct including the description that she was selected by a bunch of ignorant local party bosses. To be completely accurate though, one should point out several things from your above excerpted remarks. Dede has been backed in past elections by both the WF Party and the Conservative Party(simultaneously) which leads to the question, if Dede is radio active because she has received the WFP line endorsement, then why too isn't the Conservative Party also radioactive because they supported a WFP line candidate in the past?

Also, Dede's past conservative ratings (except for last year were around 50%) which again makes the Conservative Party suspect for endorsing such a middle-of-the-road candidate in the past.

Anyway as I pointed out on another Dede thread, third party runs don't usually work, it probably won't work in this case and I'm normally against them.

That said, this case is different. Three things;

Hoffman did try to seek the Republican nomination.

It wasn't the rank and file Republican voters who voted against Hoffman it was instead a small number of county party chairman who made the selection.

Dede's voting record has dropped below the 50% line which means of course that she votes statist more than she votes constitutionalist.

124 posted on 10/17/2009 8:44:29 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
The usual suspects will stupidly and short-sightedly claim that re-electing McCain next year is better than electing a liberal Democrat. McCain MUST be defeated at all costs. ALL COSTS.

Stupid post. If I was in Arizona I would work to defeat McCain in the primary but if McCain won that primary, I would support him over the typical marxist Democrat.

125 posted on 10/17/2009 8:51:14 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

Yet they STILL managed to expand socialism and deepen the debt. Now, excuse that away, RINO apologist.


126 posted on 10/17/2009 9:21:40 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The Second Amendment. Don't MAKE me use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

Don’t be surprised then when McCain/Graham and other RINOs stab you when you least expect it.


127 posted on 10/17/2009 9:26:10 AM PDT by rabscuttle385 (http://restoretheconstitution.ning.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

It’s true the Conservative party often backs RINOs and even “pro-life” democrats in some areas where democrats have influence with the local party (Staten Island for one). Seems to me it’s poorly run from top to bottom. Some NY area freeper (I forget who) called them a patronage outfit for the Long family.

Officially the chairman is against endorsing anyone endorsed by Working Families.


128 posted on 10/17/2009 9:33:49 AM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Impy
Some NY area freeper (I forget who) called them a patronage outfit for the Long family.

That would be me. The Conservative Party has not been the same since the Buckleys washed their hands of it.

129 posted on 10/17/2009 9:36:14 AM PDT by Clemenza (Remember our Korean War Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Don’t be surprised then when McCain/Graham and other RINOs stab you when you least expect it.

I'm fully aware of McCain's Stockholm syndrome type behavior and Goober's false guilt and over compensation related his ties to Strom Thurmond.

130 posted on 10/17/2009 9:39:45 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign; Impy
>> The usual suspects will stupidly and short-sightedly claim that re-electing McCain next year is better than electing a liberal Democrat. McCain MUST be defeated at all costs. ALL COSTS. <<
>> Stupid post. If I was in Arizona I would work to defeat McCain in the primary but if McCain won that primary, I would support him over the typical marxist Democrat. <<

Well, I agree with you, FreeReign. That's what the places where Rabs and I part ways. Rabs sees no difference between a Republican who betrays us on two or three important issues but is usually reliable vote for the GOP, and a Republican who betrays us on dozens of major issues and votes with the Dems more often than us. Rabs himself said the degree of treason makes no difference to him, he thinks anyone who votes the wrong way on an important issue must be purged from Government.

Of course I disagree. Someone like McCain should be opposed in the primary because they stabbed us in the back, but when the general election rolls around, McCain is clearly better than a full fledged marxist RAT. McCain is still more conservative than any AZ RAT. The same is not true of someone like Scozzafava. Not only does she need to be stopped in the primary, but she is unacceptable in the general election as well. Scozzafava is so liberal she's to left of many Dems in NY, and is even running to the left of the Dem nominee for this Congressional race (again, not to say he's conservative -- they're both liberals, but DailyKos likes her better) Someone like Scozzafava needs to be opposed in the general election too, because the only thing electing them will accomplish is helping Obama and Pelosi further their agenda most of the time.

Now the fact Rabs is wrong about McCain doesn't change the fact he's 100% CORRECT about socialist RINOs who side with the Dems most of the time. These kinds of "Republicans" MUST be opposed any time they seek office, regardless of whether they're running in a "blue state" or "blue district". I applaud Rabs for speaking out against liberal activists like Scozzafava.

131 posted on 10/17/2009 11:04:01 AM PDT by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: avacado

The Republicans called our house yesterday and my husband told them to take our names off their list.


132 posted on 10/17/2009 12:00:34 PM PDT by Maryhere ("HE comes to rule the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Maryhere
"The Republicans called our house yesterday and my husband told them to take our names off their list."

Good!

133 posted on 10/17/2009 12:03:28 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy; FreeReign; Impy; fieldmarshaldj; mkjessup; stephenjohnbanker
Rabs sees no difference between a Republican who betrays us on two or three important issues but is usually reliable vote for the GOP, and a Republican who betrays us on dozens of major issues and votes with the Dems more often than us.

Except that McCain is not your garden-variety RINO; McCain is a super-RINO who does not just passively oppose conservatives (by voting against them) but actively opposes them on a number of issues (immigration and cap-and-trade are by far the worst) by taking "nation-killer" positions and bringing legislation forward that furthers leftist goals. Furthermore, McCain is actively engaged in recruiting and training more RINOs to become like him (note that Graham's foray into cap-and-tax was inspired by McCain) by endorsing and supporting them (e.g., Crist, Specter before he defected, Kirk, Whitman).

In the short term, yes, McCain is certainly preferable to practically every Democrat out there. However, in the long term, McCain does immense and potentially irreparable damage to the conservative cause by attacking what is supposed to be its primary political vehicle--the Republican Party--from within. And, in that sense, McCain, in the long term, is far worse than any Democrat.

134 posted on 10/17/2009 3:10:51 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 (http://restoretheconstitution.ning.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

bump.


135 posted on 10/17/2009 6:27:41 PM PDT by ellery (It's a free country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

I’ll tell you who is still giving the RINO party money: my 89 year old mother who gets phone calls constantly and mailings every other day. They tell her that she needs to send them money or the evil Dems will ruin the country. So, she sends them money. I have told her repeatedly not to give them a dime, but they wear her down - it’s Elder Abuse.


136 posted on 10/17/2009 8:57:17 PM PDT by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
Speaking of Mark Kirk-IL, I'm not voting for him, no how, no way...who is the conservative running against him? What about the guy named Pat Ryan (can't remember his name now..Pat is definitely his first name.) I hear he is conservative and can bring in the money.
137 posted on 10/17/2009 10:32:24 PM PDT by itssme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
In the short term, yes, McCain is certainly preferable to practically every Democrat out there. However, in the long term, McCain does immense and potentially irreparable damage to the conservative cause by attacking what is supposed to be its primary political vehicle--the Republican Party--from within. And, in that sense, McCain, in the long term, is far worse than any Democrat.

McCain is what I call the 'Andropov' of RINOs.
138 posted on 10/17/2009 11:31:00 PM PDT by mkjessup (If Satan is the father of liars, that pipsqueak 0bama must surely be his sockpuppet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

We have a similar problem here in CA. The state GOP is extremely weak. They ceded this state to the rats 20+ years ago. Everyone knows what shape this state is in now. It’s a crying shame.

We are trying to leave this once magnificent state.


139 posted on 10/18/2009 2:25:12 AM PDT by bustinchops (Teddy ("The Hiccup") Kennedy - the original water-boarder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: bustinchops

Except for a few solid conservative areas....San Diego county, Orange County.....east of Sacramento, the inland empire.....the valley of Fresno et al.....


140 posted on 10/18/2009 2:40:01 AM PDT by St. Louis Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-164 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson