Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Criticized as Too Cautious, Slow on Judicial Posts
Washington Post ^ | October 16, 2009 | Michael Fletcher

Posted on 10/16/2009 12:50:39 PM PDT by La Lydia

President Obama has not made significant progress in his plan to infuse federal courts with a new cadre of judges, and liberal activists are beginning to blame his administration for moving too tentatively on what they consider a key priority. During his first nine months in office, Obama has won confirmation in the Democratic-controlled Senate for just three of his 23 nominations for federal judgeships, largely because Republicans have used anonymous holds and filibuster threats to slow the proceedings to a crawl.

But some Democrats attribute that GOP success partly to the administration's reluctance to fight, arguing that Obama's emphasis on easing partisan rancor over judgeships has backfired and only emboldened Senate Republicans. Some Republicans contend that the White House has hurt itself by its slow pace in sending over nominations for Senate consideration. President George W. Bush sent 95 names to the Senate in the same period that Obama has forwarded 23...

The delays are having a ripple effect in federal courts, where caseloads continue to back up, said Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.). Currently, about 90 judicial seats -- about 10 percent of the total -- remain vacant in appeals and district courts.

The White House predicts that nominations and confirmations will pick up soon...But liberal activists argue that Obama needs to quicken the pace, partly for political reasons. "It is incumbent on the Democrats and the White House to push as hard as they can to confirm judicial nominees, given that next year Republicans will make an all-out effort to block candidates as a means to gin up their base before the election," said Nan Aron, president of the Alliance for Justice, an advocacy organization....

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhojudicialnominees; prejudice; socialism; subversion; third100days
We are still suffering from Clinton's appointments. I guess there are times when the BO administration's amateurism and incompetence pays off.
1 posted on 10/16/2009 12:50:39 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

Well...it may be that the O can’t find any leftie Candidates that would pass the background check?


2 posted on 10/16/2009 12:53:27 PM PDT by Marty62 (former Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

Funny how the same clown posse who egged on the Democrat obstructionism of Bush’s judges now squeal like gelded pigs when their own tactics rebound on them.


3 posted on 10/16/2009 12:54:21 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Note to the GOP: Do not count your votes until they are cast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

Do the liberal activists have any idea how hard it is to find Dem DC insiders who don’t owe back taxes?


4 posted on 10/16/2009 1:03:53 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

I suspect the kind of judges he wants to appoint are Lynne Stewart-type lawyers who have defended terrorists, etc., or have ties to discredited causes and organizations such as ACORN. I’m thinking it might be politically tricky to get them confirmed.


5 posted on 10/16/2009 1:09:10 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

he didn’t do anything before being elected, a little silly to expect it now


6 posted on 10/16/2009 1:11:39 PM PDT by SF_Redux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

With President Obama’s embarrassing history of appointments, it’s hard to imagine how he could be “too cautious”.


7 posted on 10/16/2009 1:24:27 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

When Bummer sends in the clowns, the Senate laughs.


8 posted on 10/16/2009 1:27:34 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (ACORN: Absolute Criminal Organization of Reprobate Nuisances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

now before he appoints anyone he’s gotta wonder what kind of video Beck has on ‘em


9 posted on 10/16/2009 1:31:53 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marty62

***Well...it may be that the O can’t find any leftie Candidates that would pass the background check?***

Maybe he can’t find candidates well to the Left of him!


10 posted on 10/16/2009 1:49:07 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (You talkin' ta me? YOU TALKIN TO ME! Well just who are you talkin' to?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

He’s having trouble getting his nominees out of jail.


11 posted on 10/16/2009 5:43:57 PM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson