Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Navy pushes green fleet
United Press International ^ | Oct. 19, 2009 | ???

Posted on 10/19/2009 9:36:07 AM PDT by Willie Green

MCLEAN, Va., Oct. 19 (UPI) -- U.S. Navy officials laid out a series of initiatives intended to change the way the force uses energy, including the increased use of renewable resources.

U.S. Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus unveiled a series of measures at an energy forum in Virginia. The measures include a shift toward long-term energy savings, the increased use of hybrid and electric vehicles and the creation of a so-called Green Strike Group composed of nuclear- and biofuel-powered vessels.

The U.S. Department of Defense is the largest consumer of petroleum products in the United States, using roughly 330,000 barrels of oil per day. The U.S. Navy is the second-largest consumer in the Department of Defense, while the majority of energy transports fall within its security objectives.

The Office of Naval Research and the Navy's Task Force Energy organized the event to review energy strategies as part of a push toward environmentally friendly and cost-efficient methods.

"We have led the world in the adoption of new energy strategies in the past," said Mabus. "This is our legacy."


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: algae; energy

1 posted on 10/19/2009 9:36:08 AM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

History repeats itself - a wind fleet.

Back to the 7th century.


2 posted on 10/19/2009 9:37:02 AM PDT by edcoil (If I had 1 cent for every dollar the government saved, Bill Gates and I would be friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
They have one ready to go the USS Constitution just sail her out and give it a go against a modern warship.\s
3 posted on 10/19/2009 9:39:06 AM PDT by Cheetahcat (Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

“The U.S. Department of Defense is the largest consumer of petroleum products in the United States, using roughly 330,000 barrels of oil per day”.

...so because we refuse to drill off of Florida, Arctic etc we’ll have a Navy that’s going hybrid? Wind power? Sails?


4 posted on 10/19/2009 9:39:06 AM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

And don’t forget about designing solar powered submarines.


5 posted on 10/19/2009 9:39:10 AM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
U.S. Navy pushes green fleet

Ensign: "Enemy carrier in range, sir!"

Captain: "Fire torpedos, full spread!"

Environmental Officer: "Belay that order, ensign! Captain, you have not filed your environmental impact statement with the EPA as to the damage to the environment sinking that carrier could cause!"

Captain: "Ensign, please have the crew load the environmental officer into Torpedo tube three!"

6 posted on 10/19/2009 9:39:51 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

a$$ kissers


7 posted on 10/19/2009 9:40:16 AM PDT by QBFimi (When gunpowder speaks, beasts listen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
History repeats itself - a wind fleet.

No, the power source will be galley slaves taken from the White House enemies list and Freepers. Tough luck when Zero wants to water ski.

Jack

8 posted on 10/19/2009 9:40:58 AM PDT by JackOfVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: albie
...so because we refuse to drill off of Florida, Arctic etc we’ll have a Navy that’s going hybrid? Wind power? Sails?


9 posted on 10/19/2009 9:43:15 AM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

If they can get more ships nuclear powered seems like a good thing. I don’t believe in global warming but it does produce 0 greenhouse gas... more importantly it will run whether we have a good supply of oil at the time or not.


10 posted on 10/19/2009 9:48:32 AM PDT by Mount Athos (A Giant luxury mega-mansion for Gore, a Government Green EcoShack made of poo for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
I have read other articles on this, and it appears that the renewable sources of energy are just for the land bases.

Nuclear powered ships (aircraft carriers and subs) remain nuclear powered.

Surface ships and aircraft running on petroleum will be converted to bio-fuel.

New cars and trucks will be hybrids.

This isn't about being green despite that word being thrown around, it's about reducing dependence on foreign oil. Seems reasonable to me.

11 posted on 10/19/2009 9:55:34 AM PDT by OA5599
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

MODERN COMBAT:

2LT Merkle: “MEN! We are executing a sweep-and-clear of this building for Taliban. HUAH! Execute!”

Legal Officer Dumas: “HALT! We are in violation of the Foreigners with Disabilities Act, and your excessive concentration on Taliban is a Hate Crime! MP’s, arrest Merkle!”

(brief struggle while 2LT Merkle is cuffed and spirited off)

1SG Rory: “Alright, men, I’m acting NCO. We cannot take this to them, so let’s call in an airstrike! Comm Officer, what’s in the theater?”

Environmental Officer Yokidin: “Negative! Airstrikes will cause excessive pollutant release and cause a large Carbon Footprint! Additionally, no EPA Impact statement has been filed. MPs! Arrest 1SG Rory!”

(brief struggle while 1SG Rory is subdued.)

SGT Tulane: “Alright, looks like I’m in charge now. Michaels, Coulburn, I want you to deploy around the back of that building and.....”

Civil Rights Officer Angriblak: “Stop! I cannot help but notice that PVT Michaels and CPL Coulburn are AFRICAN AMERICAN, yet you want to send them to the BACK of the building.. which is a reference to being on the BACK of the bus... which is against Civil Rights Law! MP’s, arrest SGT Tulane. ....and Coulburn, take over.”

(loud struggle while SGT Tulane is put in restraints).

CPL Coulburn (picks up his rifle): “Okay, guys, here’s what......”

BATF Officer Nogunz: “HOLD UP! According to this background check, CPL Coulburn, YOU HAD A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CONVICTION IN 1992! You may NOT possess that rifle during combat!!”


12 posted on 10/19/2009 10:02:19 AM PDT by Lazamataz (DEFINITION: rac-ist (rA'sis't) 1. Anyone who disagrees with a liberal about any topic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Isn’t “Mabus” one of the names in Nostradamus that pops up during a conflagration to come???


13 posted on 10/19/2009 10:05:34 AM PDT by randomwalk (Liberalism is a psychosis...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos
We had ten nuclear powered cruisers for a while, but they were apparently too expensive to operate. Nuclear power is advantageous for submarines so that they can remain submerged indefinitely. Nuclear power is advantageous for aircraft carriers because it doubled the fuel storage capacity for the planes. But I suppose there were not enough advantages for ordinary surface ships to warrant the extra cost.

From Wikipedia:

The 1996 Navy Visibility and Management of Operating and Support Costs (VAMOSC) study determined the annual operating cost of a Virginia-class [nuclear powered] cruiser at $40 million, compared to $28 million for a Ticonderoga class cruiser, or $20 million for an Arleigh Burke class destroyer. [1] Given a lower requirement for cruisers, it was decided to retire these nuclear ships as a money-saving measure.

14 posted on 10/19/2009 10:10:15 AM PDT by OA5599
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

My recommendations for the Navy and all our military:

#1 Highest war fighting ability. Better than the likely opposition.
#2 Respect and take care of the troops/sailors/airmen
#3 Keep the chickensh!t level low (political correctness, environmentalism, special interests, ie race & homosexuals).
#4 anything that degrades #1 & #2 is to be avoided.


15 posted on 10/19/2009 10:33:13 AM PDT by RicocheT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

Make nuclear powered all US Navy and Coast Guard ships of destroyer, submarine, icebreaker or medium cutter size (over 3000 tonnes) or larger. (The USS Nautilus was minimum of 3000 tonnes).


16 posted on 10/19/2009 12:39:49 PM PDT by Aroostook25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

The navy going to he**. Why don’t they just put nukes in all of their ships, including destroyers? As for their vehicles, they are going to pay for that stupid maneuver.


17 posted on 10/19/2009 12:42:07 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar
And don’t forget about designing solar powered submarines.

Sure, you just have a long snorkel with a solar panel on it so when the sub submerges it can still draw power from the sun!/SAR(just in case someone things I am serious).

18 posted on 10/19/2009 12:43:49 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Very good!


19 posted on 10/19/2009 12:45:09 PM PDT by HereInTheHeartland (Just say no to Soylent Green health care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: OA5599
This isn't about being green despite that word being thrown around, it's about reducing dependence on foreign oil. Seems reasonable to me.

That's because you are an idiot. Drilling our own oil(and using our coal resources) and leaving the Armed Forces alone would solve the problem a lot faster and more efficiently.

20 posted on 10/19/2009 12:46:49 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: calex59
That's because you are an idiot.

Thanks for the benefit of the doubt. Odds are that I am smarter than you though. I used to operate nuclear reactors in the US Navy. Graduated 10th of 237 in my class at Naval Nuclear Power School too.

Drilling our own oil(and using our coal resources) and leaving the Armed Forces alone would solve the problem a lot faster and more efficiently.

You think that the SECNAV has the power to override laws and drill his own oil, yet I'm the idiot?

21 posted on 10/19/2009 2:22:18 PM PDT by OA5599
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson