To: oldmomster
“Reporting from Seattle - In what would be the largest habitat zone ever established in the U.S. to protect a species from extinction, the federal government today proposed designating 200,541 square miles on the coast of Alaska as critical habitat for polar bears.”
Hmmm let me guess...no drilling, it will scare the poor bears?
2 posted on
10/22/2009 2:58:24 PM PDT by
jessduntno
(Tell Obama to STFU - Stop The Federal Usurpation.)
To: oldmomster
zero never ceases to amaze me in his misguided priorities.
3 posted on
10/22/2009 2:58:36 PM PDT by
fujimoh
To: oldmomster
Baby steps...
Our media is soooo gullible.
4 posted on
10/22/2009 2:59:14 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Deficit spending, trade deficits, unsecure mortages, worthless paper... ... not a problem. Oh yeah?)
To: oldmomster
Perhaps he can relocate them to the lower 48, just like the Gitmo detainees.
6 posted on
10/22/2009 2:59:31 PM PDT by
Buck W.
(The President of the United States IS named Schickelgruber...)
To: oldmomster
The other day one of those polar bears whispered to me, “We promise Obama we won’t allow no oil drilling if he does this deal for us. And he’s gonna give us free fish! No more swimming around in cold water catching the darned things!”
12 posted on
10/22/2009 3:26:06 PM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: oldmomster
In what would be the largest habitat zone ever established in the U.S. to protect a species from extinction, the federal government today proposed designating 200,541 square miles on the coast of Alaska as critical habitat for polar bears.What is Alaska's size in square miles?
Answer
663,267 square miles. World Almanac & Book of Facts 2007
Holy Bat-Sh*t that's ONE THIRD OF THE FRIKIN STATE!!!
That is bigger than EVERY STATE with the exception of Texas and almost as big as France
That area is almost THREE TIMES the size of New England (Approx 71,000 sq miles)
If Alaskans don't revolt over this naked Fed power grab over the "Control" of that much of their state, they are not made up of what I thought they were!
13 posted on
10/22/2009 3:34:55 PM PDT by
Conservative Vermont Vet
((One of ONLY 37 Conservatives in the People's Republic of Vermont. Socialists and Progressives All))
To: oldmomster
Just another pay-for-play payoff.
14 posted on
10/22/2009 3:37:49 PM PDT by
maggief
To: oldmomster
Reporting from Seattle - In what would be the largest habitat zone ever established in the U.S. to protect a species from extinction, the federal government today proposed designating 200,541 square miles on the coast of Alaska as critical habitat for polar bears. Somebody must've found some more oil or coal or something equally useful, I guess.
15 posted on
10/22/2009 3:41:39 PM PDT by
Riley
(The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
To: oldmomster
Obama Administration proposes a critical habitat in Alaska for Polar Bears There, fixed that crap right off!
16 posted on
10/22/2009 3:47:21 PM PDT by
Gaffer
To: oldmomster
How about protecting the U.S. from extinction?
To: oldmomster
My first gut instinct was it would block drilling for America's oil, help Islamic Terrorist by keeping Oil prices high and further endanger Americans by helping to block our pursuit of energy independence.
Democrats may not be evil, but then if so, what is?
19 posted on
10/22/2009 5:00:20 PM PDT by
FreeAtlanta
(There is no "O" in Transparency.)
To: oldmomster
Sarah should absolutely destroy zero on this. I can’t wait.
20 posted on
10/22/2009 5:02:24 PM PDT by
Principled
(Get the capital back! NRST!)
To: oldmomster
What kills me here: is Obama TRYING to provoke a personalized smackdown out of Palin’s stash of whuppass?
Polar bear habitat? In Alaska? Really?
27 posted on
10/22/2009 8:23:48 PM PDT by
fightinJAG
(Mr. President: Why did you appoint a Communist to your Administration?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson