Please stop by the FReepathon thread and give it a bump. If you haven’t donated yet, please give it some thought.
Thank you!
Obviously Obama knows that global warming is nonsense.
It is communism he is dedicated to heart and soul, and he sees global warming as the key to promoting worldwide redistribution of income.
Well, you bastard 0bama; China and India have already rejected this BS.
I can hardly believe that there is any sentient being who, on hearing the spew of this preposterous imposter, doesn’t feel like projectile vomiting.
Is that any way for the President of the United States to talk? (I mean a real President.)
The earth has been cooling for 10 yrs. Perhaps he can convince the 65% who know that it is nothing more than gummit redistribution. Sounds like consensus that its a fraud.
Pray for America and Our Troops
Those who disagree will be marginalized. He doesn't even try to use moderate language.
By the Administration, and by the Media, and the UN, and the political class. However, the ranks of 'naysayers' grows ever larger.
People have to be dumber than a Pet Rock to believe the crap that comes out of this idiots pie hole.
The Revolution creeps closer every day Obama is in Office.
This red diaper, fatherless bastard is a tedious nerd.
*raises hand* <———naysayer here, kkthx.
When you're talking trillions of dollars and tens of thousands of jobs, you're {expletive}-right we're going to be cynical. I don't want some babe-in-the-woods, johnny-come-lately socialist running off half-cocked on questionable science and sensationalism.
...the more opponents would resort to underhand tactics...
The opponents will resort to underhanded tactics? Well well well, there's the pot calling the kettle black. The GW zealots ridicule, deride, and personally attack anyone who dares oppose them. They have to, if they tried to engage in meaningful debate they'd quickly lose based on facts. Hence they, the GW zealots, have to resort to underhanded tactics and ad-homineum attacks.
"The naysayers, the folks who would pretend that this is not an issue, they are being marginalized," Obama warned in a speech...
So rather than make your case to support the notion of human-caused GW, you're marginalizing the naysayers, rather than refuting their arguments. Now who is resorting to underhanded tactics?
...those whose interest or ideology run counter to the much needed action that we're engaged in...
The problem here sport is that not everyone agrees there is "much needed" action. So until you convince us otherwise, do not denounce people for acting on their beliefs.
"There are those who will suggest that moving toward clean energy will destroy our economy," Obama said, a day after the release of a poll showing fewer Americans see solid evidence of global warming.
What obama knows about running a real business or good macro economic policy would fit on a post-it with room left over for everyone on your favorite sports team to sign it. Seriously.
"There are going to be those who... make cynical claims that contradict the overwhelming scientific evidence when it comes to climate change, claims whose only purpose is to defeat or delay the change that we know is necessary."
No, wrong again obama. The "overwhelming" evidence is of questionable scientific validity. Hence we do not believe your sensationalist, crisis-mode, hurry up and give me what I want, claims. Just look at porkus, how well did that work out? Debit and deficit climbing to record levels. Unemployment continues to climb to levels not seen in a quarter century... We've seen you rush jobs, no thanks.
With the "overwhelming scientific evidence" all on the warmers side of the argument, one would think that they would welcome a good public debate, yet that appears to be the last thing they want. Funny that!
If I knew any photo shop, the scumbag Ubama's face would be on the above image, where it belongs.
From this moment forward, we debate only one issue with respect to AGW: Why is the other side intentionally lying about it? Fraudelently claming there is a crisis? Is their actual goal to impose world tyranny and taxation using AGW as a ruse?
Those are the only substantive issues. When the topic arises, that’s our message, and we have to stay on it like pitbulls on a postman’s leg.
“There are those who will suggest that moving toward clean energy will destroy our economy,” Obama said”
No, I think you took care of that already Obama!
