Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Mayor Daley Looking To Lease Water System? (Chicago)
CBS Chicago, Channel 2 ^ | 10/23/09 | Roseanne Tellez

Posted on 10/25/2009 5:05:49 AM PDT by jonascord

Chicago is considering leasing its water system to help fix the budget.

The new boss could charge whatever they want for water, CBS 2's Roseanne Tellez reports.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: chicago; corruption; daley
Correct me if I'm wrong, but when I left Chicago, years ago, water was free to any home owner or appartment dweller. Did that change?
1 posted on 10/25/2009 5:05:49 AM PDT by jonascord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jonascord
Actually, there was no separate tax or user fee in the city to use the water supply. The cost was covered by all the other taxes and fees the city imposes to pay for things.

In that light, access to water could be seen as "free".

2 posted on 10/25/2009 5:12:08 AM PDT by Bernard (If you always tell the truth, you never have to remember what you said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jonascord

Sounds like Daley is trying out “watered-down” politics!


3 posted on 10/25/2009 5:12:13 AM PDT by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jonascord
*** Correct me if I'm wrong, but when I left Chicago, years ago, water was free to any home owner or appartment dweller. Did that change? ***

No that didn't change. Chicago residents still get 'free' water (no water bill).

But many suburbs have now tapped into the Chicago Water System and we DO pay for the *privilege* of getting 'Chicago Water' (it is pretty darn good).

If Daley leases "his water" I'm sure we (the Village) will un-tap from the system and go back to our own Well Water. Which sucks as then we'll have to get a new Water Softener (when we got chi water everyone discarded their water softeners).

4 posted on 10/25/2009 5:29:32 AM PDT by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bernard

As a renter, that would be the case. For home owners, the water is not separately metered within the city; you are charged an estimated average fee for water use, twice a year. The amount is very low; I believe it’s around 600-750/household per year, no matter how much water you use. In the metered suburbs, that can be your water bill for one month (hot summer drought month that is, including the heavy watering of your lawn.) The city threatens to meter the homes separately except it would cause a riot in the poorer neighborhoods who get away without paying their water bills for extended periods of time. Leasing the system to a third party would definitely cause meters to be placed on every home, then the mayor (King Richard II) can blame the third party, private company for the incredible rise in water bills. The same way he’s blamed the tremendous increase in parking meters on the the vendor that the city leased to a couple of years ago. However this has backfired on him and people are in a rage over the tripling/quadrupling of parking fees, especially the small business owners on commercial streets throughout the city. King Richard needs to find ways to raise revenue so as to keep his bloated, corrupt bureaucracy afloat on the backs of the city dwellers. Long live King Richard II!


5 posted on 10/25/2009 5:32:09 AM PDT by john drake (Roman military maxim; "oderint dum metuant," i.e., "let them hate, as long as they fear.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jonascord
Let's see, Chavez in Venezuela is having a water shortage so maybe his friends Obama and Daley will build him a pipeline from Chicago so that he too can have "free" water. Paid for by US taxpayers of course. Sorry, don't look. Bad idea.
6 posted on 10/25/2009 6:18:46 AM PDT by libertylover (The problem with Obama is not that his skin is too black, it's that his ideas are too RED.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jonascord

As always with a Chicago/Daley deal...follow the money!


7 posted on 10/25/2009 6:38:09 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannolis. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jonascord

Isn’t this the city that leased the parking meters out resulting in an increase in parking rates and a mountain of profit for the lessors?


8 posted on 10/25/2009 6:40:28 AM PDT by Glenn (Free Venezuela!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glenn
We are one step away from the old Roman practice of tax farming, sell out the IRS to private tax collectors.

Some functions are inherently governmental functions and cannot be privatized. Judgment over crime and resulting punishment is one. Maintenance of common goods for the benefit of all is another. In fact, this years nobel prize in economics went to a woman who studied exactly this problem.

9 posted on 10/25/2009 7:05:24 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

Not charging a use fee so that economics regulates usage and creates incentives not to waste, however, is really stupid.


10 posted on 10/25/2009 7:07:32 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jonascord
Earlier.

Don't the voters get some kind of say in this?

Guess not. Too bad, Chicago. You get what you vote for.

Well. You get what you and your dead people vote for, I suppose.

11 posted on 10/25/2009 8:37:45 AM PDT by Steely Tom (Without the second, the rest are just politicians' BS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jonascord

Think what Cass Sunstein can do with water!!


12 posted on 10/25/2009 9:58:29 AM PDT by Freddd (CNN is not credible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Condor51
I don't know about you but I'm really uncomfortable being dependent on the kindness of the Daley Administration for our water.

Every single well in my town was capped years ago. If something happens to that pipeline we're screwed. It's especially disturbing in light of the fact that my town was totally 'water independent' up until City water came in.

Our town was one of the first in the nation to completely recycle our waste water into potable back during the Nixon Administration.

13 posted on 10/25/2009 10:03:11 AM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson