Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich calls GOP support for Hoffman a 'purge'
The Hill ^

Posted on 10/27/2009 7:45:09 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Gingrich calls GOP support for Hoffman a 'purge' By Jordan Fabian - 10/27/09 09:47 AM ET

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) late Monday had some choice words for Republicans supporting Conservative Party party candidate Doug Hoffman (N.Y.), accusing them of conducting a "purge" of the GOP.

Many national Republican figures, such as Gov. Tim Pawlenty (R-Minn.) and ex-Gov. Sarah Palin (R-Alaska), have backed Hoffman over GOP candidate Dede Scozzafava in the 23rd district's special election this year. The district has been long-held by Republicans, but many conservatives have shied away from Scozzafava for her socially liberal positions and the local GOP's selection process that they say was not transparent.

Gingrich broke the mold and backed Scozzafava, saying her candidacy gave the Republicans the best shot of regaining a congressional majority. The former Speaker faced a push-back from the right after his announcement but he upped the ante on Monday.

"This idea that we're suddenly going to establish litmus tests and all across the country we're going to purge the party of anybody who doesn't agree with us 100 percent; that guarantees Obama's reelection, that guarantees Pelosi as Speaker-for-life," he told Fox News last night.

Gingrich called Scozzafava a "liberal Republican" for her support of gay marriage and abortion rights. But he defended those positions as in-step with her district and her predecessor, former Rep. John McHugh (R-N.Y.), who was tapped to be President Barack Obama's Army Secretary.

But he said that her endorsement from the National Rifle Association, her signing a no tax-increase pledge, and her opposition to cap-and-trade and healthcare reform legislation made her "adquately conservative in an upstate New York district."

Gingrich also attacked Hoffman for not having proper knowledge of local issues and living outside the 23rd district.

"So I say to many conservative friends who suddenly decided whether they're from Minnesota, or Alaska, or Texas, they know more than the upstate New York Republicans? I don't think so," he added.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gingrich; hoffman; newt; ny23; rinopurge; scozzafava; whigpartyii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 151-200201-250251-300301-306 next last
To: Sub-Driver

geez, it’s really now all about his fatassed ego really...

what number jump the shark moment is this now for Snewt.


251 posted on 10/27/2009 10:39:16 AM PDT by wardaddy (folks, these freepathons are taking too long tightwads, shame on us in front of the kooks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Newt is a LIBERAL....

Let’s be fully honest about it. Newt is now a Liberal.

He has went from Contract for America to Contract On America


252 posted on 10/27/2009 10:40:32 AM PDT by UCFRoadWarrior (The Return of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
It's likely as been pointed out before, the New York Conservative Party is no fly-by-night organization. It has a history.

In 1970 William F. Buckley's brother James Buckley was elected to the U.S. Senate as a Conservative Party candidate.

William F. Buckley was the Conservative Party's candidate for mayor of New York City in 1965 -- but insisted upon a recount when he won. The recount showed that he actually lost -- just kidding. Buckley said that the first he'd do if elected is insist upon a recount. :)

253 posted on 10/27/2009 10:50:43 AM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Newt, its time to waddle off the stage. Yo time is up!


254 posted on 10/27/2009 10:53:59 AM PDT by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Speaking of purging, we’ve allowed strong conservative leadership to be practically purged from the Republican Party. They’ve either gone the way of Newt, who had his golden opportunity long ago and went ‘weak kneed’, or they’ve been marginalized by elites who think of themselves as the rightful owners of the Republican brand.

Perhaps we’re going to find out now if there are enough Reagan Conservatives in this country to rescue it from the destructive path of political gamesmen, agenda driven leftists, and those who are willing to compromise away any principles they may have had, or appeared to have had, in order to “work with” those who are bent on our destruction. Why is it that we must always compromise with “them” for the sake of “unity”, but, they must never compromise with “us”?

We may succeed, by the grace of God, with prayer and principle and support for those who share our conservative values. But, if we do not succeed in electing genuine Conservatives, we will not have lost any more than we would have lost by electing someone as liberal as Ms. Scozzafava.

A leftist is a leftist regardless of the “R” or “D” behind the name, whether or not that name is Pelosi, and it is ridiculous for Newt, or anyone else, to claim rejecting Scozzafava, or anyone as liberal, is a litmus test regarding others who may be less conservative than we would like. The problem is that we have continued to accept Republican Party candidates as the representative percentages of our beliefs and values diminished to this point.

Our Founding Documents need more loyal defenders to join with the few we have in place. America deserves more than what she is getting from the majority of those in power today.

We no longer have the luxury of “going along to get along” with leftists. Our survival is at stake.


255 posted on 10/27/2009 11:01:37 AM PDT by LucyJo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

Thanks!


256 posted on 10/27/2009 11:04:23 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (We're right! We're free! And we'll fight! And you'll seeeeeeee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Good point.


257 posted on 10/27/2009 11:05:43 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (We're right! We're free! And we'll fight! And you'll seeeeeeee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: Callahan

Are you a Conservative, or a Republican?

That’s a serious question, because if you’re a Conservative, and a liberal Republican gets the votes, then that means you lose, right? How could it possibly be construed as a win from a Conservative standpoint?

However, if you’re a Republican and not a Conservative, then I guess I could see your point...


258 posted on 10/27/2009 11:15:08 AM PDT by Miztiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I love it. Newt is making it impossible for him to make any real run at being President and I won’t have anymore arguments with Freepers who think he is a real conservative.


259 posted on 10/27/2009 11:16:52 AM PDT by packrat35 (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples money.- M Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Doug Hoffman for Congress
 
October 27, 2009
 
Campaign Alert – 7 Days to Victory  Donate Now
 
Call for help:

The phones are ringing off the hook at the Saranac Lake headquarters. We desperately need volunteers to help answer phones, process donations, and help with a myriad of other tasks. It is a great problem to have, but with this ground swell of support comes a lot coordination and effort. Please volunteer to ensure victory.

 
New TV Ad:

It feature Fred Thompson, see it here: https://www.doughoffmanforcongress.com/

 
Internet Poll:

Please go to: http://smartgirlpolitics.ning.com/ and vote for Doug.

 
News:
Local Republicans Endorse Doug
10 Republican leaders across the district endorsed Doug today. They include:
Bob Dugan, who resigned today as first vice chairman of the Fulton County Republican Committee
Mark Flack, a Franklin County GOP committeeman
Mary Ashley Carroll, former St. Lawrence County Republican committeewoman
William Eschler, Fulton County clerk, county Republican committeeman
Al Bohn, former Fulton County treasurer
Richard Simpson, Lee Town GOP committee
Lucien Leroux, Franklin County Republican committee, Fort Covington GOP chair
Mark J. Wells, Fort Covington GOP committee
Joe Spadaro, Harrietstown GOP chairman
June Iby, Westville GOP committeewoman 
 
National Republicans Endorse Doug
Congressman Dana Rohrabacher

Congressman John Linder (GA-07)

Governor Tim Pawlenty 
 
Local Office Activities:
St. Lawrence County promotional rallies:

Tuesday the 27th @ 4:30 in Ogdensburg corner of State and Canton Street in Rite Aid parking lot
Wednesday the 28th @ noon in Gov. at the Town Square
Thurs. the 29th @ 4:30 in Massena at corner of 37 and Main in McDonalds parking lot
Friday the 30th @ noon in Canton at the Town Park
For more info contact Jamie Sinclair @ 315 528 1614 or
jamiesinclair@gmail.com
or Darlene Sinclair @ 315 322 4115 or darlenesinclair@gmail.com

 
Photo Gallery:

See new political cartoons depicting Sarah Palin and Doug Hoffman, as well as pictures of Doug on the road and our supporters in our photo gallery.

Daniel Odescalchi
Daniel@Doughoffmanforcongress.com
www.doughoffmanforcongress.com


260 posted on 10/27/2009 11:18:17 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (If they won't "secure the Blessings of Liberty to Posterity," they won't secure yours either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Gingrich also attacked Hoffman for not having proper knowledge of local issues and living outside the 23rd district.

Why doesn't Gingrich come out for David Harmer in the CA-10, since John Garamendi also doesn't live in the district he's running for?

-PJ

261 posted on 10/27/2009 11:19:32 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Comprehensive congressional reform legislation only yields incomprehensible bills that nobody reads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

“Bathory used to bathe in blood of murdered young women, yes?”

Yes, it’s kept her young for 400 years.

She’s now the Speaker of the House, but has moved on to fetal stem cells.


262 posted on 10/27/2009 11:28:28 AM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: tarheelswamprat

Thank you for that info.


263 posted on 10/27/2009 11:28:52 AM PDT by Miztiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance

Obviously, if Queen Nancy ran with an ‘R’ beside her name, Newt would support her as the “new face of the Republican Party”....

hh


264 posted on 10/27/2009 11:38:19 AM PDT by hoosier hick (Note to RINOs: We need a choice, not an echo....Barry Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
"This idea that we're suddenly going to establish litmus tests and all across the country we're going to purge the party of anybody who doesn't agree with us 100 percent; that guarantees Obama's reelection, that guarantees Pelosi as Speaker-for-life," he told Fox News last night.


265 posted on 10/27/2009 12:02:13 PM PDT by xjcsa (And these three remain: change, hope and government. But the greatest of these is government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Internet Poll:

Please go to: http://smartgirlpolitics.ning.com/ and vote for Doug.
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

From their poll to God's ears! :-)
266 posted on 10/27/2009 12:27:41 PM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX --"God help us all, and God help America!!" --my new mantra for the next 4 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

Them’s smart girls!


267 posted on 10/27/2009 12:32:22 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (If they won't "secure the Blessings of Liberty to Posterity," they won't secure yours either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Newty, please, STFU!


268 posted on 10/27/2009 12:50:44 PM PDT by Lockbar (March toward the sound of the guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

GOP purge bump for later.........


269 posted on 10/27/2009 1:55:55 PM PDT by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; NFHale; Arthur Wildfire! March; Clintonfatigued; BillyBoy; AuH2ORepublican; ...

Newton is right actually. It IS a purge.

A purge of not of a moderate but of a liberal democrat who runs as a Republican (and Acornist Working Family’s marxist).

You are *** damn right I apply a “litmus test” to being a Republican Newt. A simple one, agree with conservative position on an issue ‘at least’ 51-60% of the time. You can’t even do that you’re in the wrong party, period. Dede Scuzzobama and Olympia Snowe aren’t welcome in my party anymore than a burglar is welcome in my home.

Newt is doing the MSM’s job for it on this race. His parroting exactly what NYTimes writers are saying and will continue to say. Feeding the beast and hurting the party in the guise of helping it.

And Newt? Partial Birth Abortion is not “in step” with I don’t think ANY district, a supermajority of Americans think it’s vile.

Newt: “So I say to many conservative friends who suddenly decided whether they’re from Minnesota, or Alaska, or Texas, they know more than the upstate New York Republicans ? I don’t think so,”

Upstate New York Republican voters DID NOT GET a choice Newt. Do I think I “know more” than the handful of county bosses that appointed Dede not to mention yourself? I don’t think I do, I know I do, and I find that depressing. You were the architect of the 94 revolution, you should not be so stupid. Now do everyone a favor and shut up and go away before you make it impossible for any conservative Republican to ever remember anything good about you.


270 posted on 10/27/2009 2:06:05 PM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Sorry Newt. You are entitled to your opinion, and I would hate to see the democrat win, but you’ve got to draw the line somewhere. I’m not going to vote for or support someone just because they claim to be a republican.


271 posted on 10/27/2009 3:51:38 PM PDT by smokingfrog (No man's life, liberty or property is safe while the legislature is in session. I AM JIM THOMPSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy

The problem here is Gingrich is attempting to adapt a rodent play, and it won’t work for us. First of all, he’s presuming a leftist fits this district. It’s not a leftist district. That’s the screw up #1. Secondly, let’s presume it is a leftist district and we win with an ultraleft RINO. There’s no guarantee that said RINO will even vote for a GOP Speaker (Gingrich has already forgotten he had to abdicate because there might’ve been enough RINOs in the 1999-2000 Congress that would’ve voted for another individual, putting at risk the Dems winning the Speakership by a plurality). And also the RINO won’t vote for most of our legislation. So, again, you’ve failed to accomplish anything other than electing a person opposed to (in Scozzafava’s case) 85% of the GOP agenda.

But how does it conversely work for the Dems ? Because said “Moderate/Conservative” Dems running in GOP districts are, in fact, lying about being Conservative. As soon as they win, they vote for Pelosi (no Dem has opposed Pelosi for Speaker yet — she even got Dems that refused to vote for Gephardt in prior Congresses, and Gephardt was more moderate), so that disqualifies them as Conservative. And then the bulk of them tend to support the liberal-left Dem agenda no less than 65-70% of the time (for the most moderate) and 90% for most of the rest (if not 100% in some cases - such as the rabid Stalinist Joe Sestak in PA who represents a Republican district).

So in conclusion, “Conservative Democrats” vote liberal and liberal RINOs vote, well, liberal. What do REAL Conservatives get out of this ? To quote Edwin Starr in his song “War”, ‘Absolutely Nothing, Huh !”


272 posted on 10/27/2009 4:08:45 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Newt.....the numbers say YOU are wrong.
.

My opinion.


273 posted on 10/27/2009 4:20:06 PM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy

He’s really gone around the bend, hasn’t he.


274 posted on 10/27/2009 4:20:06 PM PDT by darkangel82 (I don't have a superiority complex, I'm just better than you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

How could a man whom 15 years ago seemed so smart turned out to be so stupid? Newt never misses a chance to remind conservatives why no one should ever vote him back into any national office.

Newt never learns. Even after being tossed out of office by his RINO friends fueled by his own personal conduct he still won't learn. No wonder the 1995 GOP Congressional takeover was such a pathetic flop. It's not about your precious Party Newt it's about saving this nation and getting elected willing to get the job done. Your -R means nothing to me.

275 posted on 10/27/2009 4:32:54 PM PDT by cva66snipe (Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamofCarmichael

Yup, I remember Jim Buckley...hell of a good Senator.

Ed


276 posted on 10/27/2009 5:00:28 PM PDT by Sir_Ed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Gene Taylor voted for Murtha in 2003 and 2005. Once they won the majority though he promptly fell in line and lurched left.

Parker Griffith claims he won’t vote for her again in 2011. Hopefully he won’t get the opportunity to vote at all.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/0809/Dixie_Dem_wont_vote_for_Pelosi.html


277 posted on 10/27/2009 5:23:16 PM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: LucyJo
"But, if we do not succeed in electing genuine Conservatives, we will not have lost any more than we would have lost by electing someone as liberal as Ms. Scozzafava." You are so right. I am currently in the mode of let the chips fall where they may. I hope they fall for Hoffman and I would certainly vote for him if given the opportunity. McCain was the last person I have voted for on the sole basis of his being a Republican, and I am and will remain a Republican regardless of what the future brings. I just will not not feel obligated to vote R when the candidate is so obviously in the wrong party. However the chips fall, this NY race is forcing a showdown that does not bode well for those in Newt's camp who refuse to face the fact that they cannot win elections without conservative votes. Conservatives cannot do it alone either so there has to be compromises made but that is everyday living for all of us. It can be done if there are ground rules and an agreed upon direction for the party to travel. American liberty, freedom, and independence certainly are at stake and God help us all if we do not soon get ourselves back on track.
278 posted on 10/27/2009 5:26:05 PM PDT by mountainfolk ( God bless America and our Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: NFHale; Cedric; rabscuttle385; sickoflibs

Hey Rabs you apparently are the leader of a “crowd”. ;D


279 posted on 10/27/2009 5:27:43 PM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: NFHale; campaignPete R-CT

I advocate giving $$$ directly to candidates or PACs you like rather to than to the party.


280 posted on 10/27/2009 5:31:21 PM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...

And it’s too bad Newtless doesn’t run for something again. I mean, other than the Presidency (as he’s been doing for a while now).

[Former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson] to Newt: We’re not ‘deaf, dumb’
Politico
Posted on 10/27/2009 4:45:19 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2372392/posts


281 posted on 10/27/2009 5:31:31 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

It’s not a “purge”, Newt. We simply reject your RINO values. Go apologize to your ex wife or something.


282 posted on 10/27/2009 5:57:04 PM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Purge.

Well I guess then you don’t need my money or my vote. And I don’t need no stinkin’ GOP.


283 posted on 10/27/2009 6:03:10 PM PDT by EBH (it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy
"crowd"

Sorry, I should have said, "rabid pack of subversives."

284 posted on 10/27/2009 7:15:09 PM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

Newt hasn’t been smart since the last century. The more he talks the more his idiocy surfaces...Never did like him and he just keeps verifying my early opinion of him...JMHO


285 posted on 10/27/2009 7:20:52 PM PDT by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

286 posted on 10/27/2009 8:07:28 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountainfolk
"Conservatives cannot do it alone either so there has to be compromises made but that is everyday living for all of us. It can be done if there are ground rules and an agreed upon direction for the party to travel."

Absolutely. The biggest beef for most conservatives is that ground rules are so easily bent or broken, and there is a steady drift leftward by Party leadership.

It wouldn't be a surprise at all to see an immediate effort to "moderate" Hoffman and to pull him to the "more civil center" as soon as he is elected. The problem is that the center keeps moving further to the uncivil left in Washington D.C..

287 posted on 10/27/2009 8:09:49 PM PDT by LucyJo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: NFHale; rabscuttle385; fieldmarshaldj; Impy; Clintonfatigued; hiredhand; Squantos; Gilbo_3; ...
RE :”Well, they supported Arlen Sphincter over Pat Toomey too. How’d that work out?

I remember clearly. GWB went out and campaigned against Toomey for Spector in 2004. And it paid off because Spector was (even in the 1980s) and is a big spender. And look what Bush had planned for year 5 (2005) perfect for Spector, not for Toomey. Except about 2006 and 2007 the wild spending and debt party was starting to catch up with the economy, inflation , devaluation of the dollar and a very unhappy ending last year.

288 posted on 10/27/2009 8:14:59 PM PDT by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the government spending you demand stupid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Cedric; NFHale; sickoflibs; Impy
Sorry, I should have said, "rabid pack of subversives."

Rabid, no. But I am definitely a subversive...I work to subvert the globalist, collectivist, anti-American, anti-Constitution, RINO agenda of appeasement of and surrender to the Left.

Of course, we all know who you champion.

289 posted on 10/27/2009 8:22:52 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 (http://restoretheconstitution.ning.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: Cedric; NFHale

poor cedric...cant get over himself...


290 posted on 10/27/2009 8:30:41 PM PDT by Gilbo_3 (Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force... Like fire, a dangerous servant & master. GW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Hey Newt
It's probably time to start looking for your next wife because you've completely squandered any political capital you once had with this conservative. Look for me to turn off any talk show you're a guest on.

The republican party left me, I didn't leave the republican party.

291 posted on 10/27/2009 8:31:49 PM PDT by stig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BAW

No, keep talking, Newt. We need the vermin out in the open where we can see them.


292 posted on 10/27/2009 8:54:10 PM PDT by ellery (It's a free country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

Don’t forget Sessions and Boehner. Apparently they are not only pouring massive new money into DeDe’s campaign in these last days, but also have her campaign HQ fully staffed with their own National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) people, making calls, going door-to-door, etc.

Sessions and Boehner (and the rest of the NRCC executive committee) are even more culpable here than Gingrich and Steele—they’re the ones keeping Dede together behind the scenes.


293 posted on 10/27/2009 8:58:45 PM PDT by ellery (It's a free country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: PGR88
not sure how he got so stupid on this issue.

He got stupid on a few other issues before this one.

Go Green with the Newt and Nazi Newt and Hilly

294 posted on 10/27/2009 10:23:31 PM PDT by Just A Nobody ( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ellery

I know Boehner’s one of these squishy “big tent at all costs” types, but what the heck is Sessions thinking?


295 posted on 10/27/2009 10:32:18 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (We're right! We're free! And we'll fight! And you'll seeeeeeee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
I know Boehner’s one of these squishy “big tent at all costs” types, but what the heck is Sessions thinking?

Which Sessions are you thinking about? House or senate?

296 posted on 10/28/2009 1:08:31 AM PDT by cva66snipe (Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
"Gingrich called Scozzafava a "liberal Republican" for her support of gay marriage and abortion rights. But he defended those positions as in-step with her district and her predecessor, former Rep. John McHugh (R-N.Y.), who was tapped to be President Barack Obama's Army Secretary."

No wonder The Kenyan put McHugh in charge of the army, he's the perfect guy for fags in uniform.

Gingrich approves.

yitbos

297 posted on 10/28/2009 1:14:31 AM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The NY Post said Scozzafava is the hand-picked candidate of former state GOP chairman Joseph Mondello and we have Newt as a subversive as well. When this ends Newt and Mondello will not have changed and will still be silently working in background of the party machinery undermining conservatism. Scozzafava is a puppet to these people. They intentionally hide themselves (Mondello) and/or their backroom deals (Newt?). Until the majority of these DIABLOs are PURGED, conservatism will lose to their picking the candidates: McCain, Scozzafava et al. How it is to come about I don’t know but the party machinery has to have a massive purging of these background figures because they are operating with impunity and feel secure in their anonymity.


298 posted on 10/28/2009 6:05:38 AM PDT by Duke of Milan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

Oops, I got Jeff (Senator) and Pete (Rep.) confused. My bad...duh!


299 posted on 10/28/2009 7:08:50 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (We're right! We're free! And we'll fight! And you'll seeeeeeee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

I’m no expert on McHugh, but a poster upthread from his district said it’s a lie to say he’s pro-gay marriage and pro-choice.


300 posted on 10/28/2009 7:14:34 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (We're right! We're free! And we'll fight! And you'll seeeeeeee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 151-200201-250251-300301-306 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson