Skip to comments.Does HIV mean certain death? (AIDS and Global Warming have one thing in common: HARD-LEFT POLITICS!)
Posted on 10/28/2009 8:32:21 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
click here to read article
“Do you really want to identify yourself with those who inhabit the sewers of the FR community”?
And IIRC it was Wacka-doodle-doo that was whining about being called wacka-doodle-doo not all that long ago.
I wouldn’t sweat it too terribly much GGG, the residual DC/DU crowd you see stalking you now that’s already been beat down by JR by my count at least twice in as many weeks, are simply too incompetent to get themselves banned.
It’s hard to imagine who makes more fun of them at this point, FReepers or their whack-job brethren at DC that are at least competent enough to do what they set out to do: get banned from FR. :)
We’ll have to come up with a differentiation from the normal liberal fare...
let’s see...something with homeless in the handle...
and what are those little fishies that swim alongside sharks looking for some scraps...?
Also, this kid was a huge and tragic story 26 years ago here in Colorado. He’s still going strong.
So as not to get personal, I will only refer to the fact that some people (and you know who you are) are such asses that you could qualify to be the m-ass-cot for the Democrat party.
Yepper. You've put the "pontiff" in pontificate and the ego in idiot... HOLD ON THERE A MINUTE!
You say, "There's no ego in idiot!!!"
OH YES THERE IS!!! More than you can imagine.
Let me print this again...
Youll never hear from me again... Youll never hear from me again... Youll never hear from me again... Youll never hear from me again...
I like the sound of it! Sing it again!!!
“and what are those little fishies that swim alongside sharks looking for some scraps...?”
I’m gonna go with bottom-dwelling scum-suckers... or would that be lawyers?
(Not when I need a lawyer, of course)
Liberals continue to project alot.
It’s a hoot to see you and your ilk pretend to be “real conservatives”.
And make stuff up about freepathons and most everything else.
But do keep marginalizing yourselves and ignoring JR.
Who knows, maybe one day you’ll get your wish and hoot it up over on DC after you finally get yourself banned!
You’re NEVER EVER going to get to decide what is or isn’t “acceptable science”, (or for that matter anything else) not only on here on FR but ANYWHERE that will ever matter.
You’re not going to hijack every thread and turn it into a poo flinging contest because several people have already indicated to GGG they enjoy the articles and many discussions continue on despite you and the other buckets of poo.
People that DO matter still make fantastic posts and have been around long enough to recognize it’s best to avoid you.
But there is that one purpose you DO serve for those that are brand new to conservatism and/or FR, and that is the concept of liberals simply having no shame or self-respect.
And hey! It’s an important purpose!
(insert Howard Dean victory cry here... and I mean that in a good way).
Good post, T.
Let me be clear...
let me be clear...
let me be clear...
if liberals were anymore self-absorbed we wouldn’t need to make anymore cornbread or scotty paper towels or kitty litter.
There’s just GOT to be someway to convince them to sop themselves up Gordon!
But I’m still working on getting them to understand the only way to save the planet is for them to stop emitting and quit moving air...it’s really the only way out to save the planet!
but that thing about making up rules for everyone else that they don’t get to follow themselves keeps getting in the way darn-it!
Your incessant 'JimRob' whining sure canned about 30 other freepers over time...So I still consider it a threat. Period.
Just like all your unchristian lowlife "drunkard" remarks that almost got you banned by a mod with a brain.. until you pulled a 'JimRob' special on him too.
It’s amazing how easily GGG sets off a group posting orgasm with the lunatic fringe.
Right you are... the only chance we’re left with, then is to minimize them. Wish I had a shrink ray.
But alas; all we’re left with as a strategy is to unite and conquer. It’s worked before. Listening to Rush and his commentary on Reagan today made me feel hopeful in a way and helpless in another. Rush is saying it right. We need a common, conservative message. I think we’re capable of that as a group of conservatives, but without a leader that shares those views and has no fear of failure (not to mention a lack of skeletons in the proverbial closet) we’re just screaming in the desert.
Who’s out there with both the personality and the message?
“Its amazing how easily GGG sets off a group posting orgasm with the lunatic fringe.”
You’re right. You guys crawl out of the woodwork every time he posts, don’cha?
GGG pings us. They just show up.
Kind of like they’re looking for it..... ya know?
“Kind of like theyre looking for it..... ya know?”
No doubt... but for a select few, I’m convinced most of them are disingenuous liberal H1N1 that are only here to stir the pot. At best... I was going to add an at best, but I don’t see one.
YOU ARE THE LUNATIC FRINGE, xcamel. But as such, you will probably never grasp that fact. As I said before, your days are numbered here on FR. Your addictive and self-destructive personality has no choice but to cross the line and get yourself banned. Although, I have to hand it to you for lasting this long, as you are far more looney and offensive than Coyoteman ever was.
[[Yet effective means, DDT, of preventing malaria spread and infection only costs a few dollars per person per year. But where are the Malaria Quilts and ribbons on trees?]]
Great point- I’d doen a few reports on the NON threat of DDT, and how it too became a celebrity cause to ban the substance while ignoring hte fact that people were dropping dead from a fully preventable problem- IT IS JUST SIMPLY STUNNING the hypocrisy and mentality of the far left wirth their causes- They are NOT concerned about ANYTHING but undermining conservative values, and the FACT that they oppose DDT while approving more funding for research into a lifestyle disease like Aids shows they are infact depopulation advocates who could care less about people who are TRULY suffering from diseases and maladies that they have no control over- their hypocrisy is simply stunning
“YOU ARE THE LUNATIC FRINGE, xcamel.”
I hate to inform you that you, sir have crossed the line. Your words have slandered lunatics everywhere and on behalf of the lunatics... I DEMAND AN APOLOGY!
We will not be called “xcamel’s”!!!
By the way... I am a lunatic, but I’m lunatic mainstream... not lunatic fringe. We’ll leave that to Mr. X.
(Great post you did there, Mr. GGG)
Are you saying that equating lunacy with xcamel is an insults to lunatics everywhere? I had no idea. From now on, whenever I refer to xcamel’s state of mind, I be sure to make it absolutely clear that she is a sub-lunatic! My humblest apologies, sir!
“My humblest apologies, sir!”
You’re a gentleman and a scholar... I tip my hat to you, my good man.
With every post of yours, you are pushing FR closer to looneyville.
Thanks for the ping
Notice how leftists try to hold conservatives “to their own standards” but have none of their own. Same thing with atheists arguing with Christians.
The funny thing about the left and atheists, though, is that they don’t understand the concept of “sinful man” and therefore can’t understand that we KNOW we can’t live up to that standard, thus the need for a Savior.
Kind of hypocritical, the do as I say, not as I do, mentality.
Must be nice to be free of the constraints one so willingly imposes on others. Such is moral relativism.
So, what about it? Are you going to reply to my comment in post 49 that is a reply to your declaration that you are going to keep stalking and harassing GGG across threads on FR?
The post wasn’t to you there, brainchild.
You and your ilk do not exist in a vacuum, and you’re driving more people away from FR that you could ever imagine.
If anyone is driving people away from FR, it's people who behave like you, who lash out at everyone around them like an out of control toddler throwing a temper tantrum, hitting and spitting and calling them names like *poopyhead*.
I haven't seen you post one nice post to anyone ever and your posting history bears that out for all to see.
True, because you have never actually looked.
It's really sad that you just can't seem to get your head around that pesky 9th commandment.
Wow.. some kind of direct connection to the mind of God.. Just how do you do it?
If you had any idea of just how big a jackass you made of yourself with that post, you’d quit FR and never darken it’s doorstep again.
Breakthrough documentary “House of Numbers” challenges conventional thinking on HIV, AIDS
A MOVIE COMING OUT THAT CHALLENGES AIDS
Sorry... I guess angermemnon is just trying to earn his way into another ban on FR
What? Didn't I go back enough years?
It's really sad that you just can't seem to get your head around that pesky 9th commandment.
Why is it that evos are so quick to invoke commandments about lying when it doesn't even apply? Why are you guys so obsessed with it that you'll do it even when you make fools of yourself doing so?
How is my saying that I've never seen you ever post anything nice a lie? You just admitted in the previous sentence that what I said was true. Then you accuse me of lying?
How does that work in the evo amoral system?
it’s probably best to just ignore the trolls like xcamel- she isn’t interested in intellectual honesty- only in gettign a rise out of people— it’s a sad little life that thrives on attention, and revels in pulling people into futile arguments- the goal of a troll is to drag topics offtopic for pages- just keep reporting her troll behavior- perhaps, with any luck, she’ll go the way of al lthe past FR trolls who were booted (then turn around and play the martyr lol)- don’t bother asking her questions- she isn’t itnerested in engagign you or anyone else in honest discussion, as she’s more than amply proven time and time again
Playtime trolls are relatively easy to spot, but they may not be apparent to the naive user. There isn’t a single set of characteristics that applies to playtime trolls, but you can look for some or all of the following signs:
a lack of buy-in to the list philosophy or values
generally low level of activity, with sudden spurts of interaction - or perhaps a new persona that has strong opinions on controversial subjects
a mixture of friendly posts with a confrontational style of interaction
the use of provocative language and sweeping generalisations about certain topics or categories of people
a lack of in-depth understanding of the topic
a lack of personal information
a lack of a genuinely unique perspective on the topic
a lack of humour
restarting topics that have already been done
use of language that encourages the dialogue to enter topics that are controversial and likely to upset some team members
the use of an attention-seeking gimmick (e.g.: “I was once exploited by an XYZ”)
inconsistencies in the style and nature of the post and any proclaimed information (e.g.: claiming to be a child but writing with an adult style; claiming to be adult, but writing with a childish grammatical construction).
also note that trolls often seem to use free email services (such as hotmail.com) or have email addresses ending in .edu. However, trolls could be virtually anyone, and the email address is no guide as to whether the persona is a bona fide user or not.
To counteract playtime trolls, the best action is to ignore them. If you are convinced they are trolls, then you can advise the list manager. However, if other group members respond to the suspected troll’s posts, then you may have to consider some of the responses outlined for tactical or strategic trolls.
You two romantically involved also?
Do not feed the trolls. All you’ve accomplished is to have permitted yourself to be diverted from the topic of the forum into insults and various other insincere declarations.
LOL. Pot... meet kettle.
What moral base to non-Christians or non religious people adhere to?
Do you agree with GGG’s contentions about HIV-AIDS that he prominently posts on his profile page? I ask because of your scientific and pharma background. I am genuinely curious - and I’m sure GGG is as well.
For the record, a person can be agnostic on the cause of AIDS and still believe there are enough paradoxes with respect to the HIV-AIDS hypothesis to warrant a reappraisal of the same.