Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama hails expansion of hate crimes legislation (aka Pedophile Protection Act)
San Jose Mercury News ^ | Oct 28, 2009 | Ben Feller

Posted on 10/28/2009 6:51:40 PM PDT by DesertRenegade

President Barack Obama today signed and celebrated hate crime legislation that extends protection to people based on sexual orientation, sealing a long-fought victory to gay advocates. The president spoke of a nation becoming a place where "we're all free to live and love as we see fit."

The new law expands federal hate crimes to include those committed against people because of gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or disability. It also loosens limits on when federal law enforcement can intervene and prosecute crimes, amounting to the biggest expansion of the civil-rights era law in decades.

"No one in America should ever be afraid to walk down the street holding the hands of the person they love," Obama said in East Room reception, surrounded by joyous supporters. "No one in America should be forced to look over their shoulder because of who they are, or because they live with a disability."

Civil rights groups and their Democratic backers on Capitol Hill have tried for a decade to expand the hate crimes law, but fell short because of a lack of coordination between the House and Senate, or opposition from President George W. Bush. This time, the bill got through when Democrats attached it to a must-pass $680 billion defense measure over the protests of Republicans. Obama signed the combined bill in a separate ceremony earlier today.

Conservatives have opposed the legislation, arguing that it creates a special class of victims and could serve to silence clergymen or others opposed to homosexuality on religious or philosophical grounds.

(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; obama; pedophilia; sodomy
What is so despicable about this legislation is that it will potentially lead to the arrest of any Pastor who speaks out against the decadent homosexual lifestyle. It's a dangerous sign that our government has now gotten to the point of forcibly legislating acceptance of bizarre and perverse lifestyle choices.
1 posted on 10/28/2009 6:51:41 PM PDT by DesertRenegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

Obama is such a sick and worthless bastard....


2 posted on 10/28/2009 6:55:48 PM PDT by Gator113 (Obamba, Reid, Pelosi, the socialist triad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

You nailed it. A sick and perverted bastard who’s goal is to destroy traditional America. And his self hating American Democrat allies are doing the heavy lifting for him.


3 posted on 10/28/2009 6:57:34 PM PDT by Bulldawg Fan (Victory is the last thing Murtha and his fellow Defeatists want.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

Punishment of thoughtcrime is now seen as a hallmark of freedom. Unfortunately, these are some highly interesting times we’re living in.


4 posted on 10/28/2009 6:57:54 PM PDT by eclecticEel (The Most High rules in the kingdom of men ... and sets over it the basest of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

bookmark


5 posted on 10/28/2009 7:08:39 PM PDT by massmike (...So this is what happens when OJ's jury elects the president....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade
Could you point me to the part of law that would penalize those that simply speak out against homosexuals?
6 posted on 10/28/2009 7:09:20 PM PDT by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

it would be the partS, not part. it would not be difficult to chain this together with ever loosening liability rules to produce a class action against all who preach this is evil.


7 posted on 10/28/2009 7:12:06 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (ACORN: Absolute Criminal Organization of Reprobate Nuisances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

A closet queer. Why else would he pick such a manly looking woman?


8 posted on 10/28/2009 7:13:04 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The Second Amendment. Don't MAKE me use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
I am opposed to these laws because they are redundant.

However, we have had 16 years of “hate crime” laws and I don't think anyone has been charged with a hate crime for speaking out against a racial, ethnic or religious group.

9 posted on 10/28/2009 7:18:44 PM PDT by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

To add insult to injury, they claim they’re doing it as an exercise in “regulating commerce among the several states”.


10 posted on 10/28/2009 7:21:01 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

It’s considered as an axiom that religious groups will disagree amongst themselves, and that it is in very bad taste to criticize somebody on account of his race. And neither one goes around with nearly as large a chip on his shoulder than the fags do.


11 posted on 10/28/2009 7:22:29 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (ACORN: Absolute Criminal Organization of Reprobate Nuisances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

Free to live and love as we see fit... what if my amorous attraction is goats?


12 posted on 10/28/2009 7:38:41 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (ACORN: Absolute Criminal Organization of Reprobate Nuisances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
However, we have had 16 years of “hate crime” laws and I don't think anyone has been charged with a hate crime for speaking out against a racial, ethnic or religious group.

Only the terminally naive don't know this is the next step
AKA instrumentalism

13 posted on 10/28/2009 7:51:13 PM PDT by dennisw (Obama -- our very own loopy, leftist god-thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade
Chairman Obamao ...signed and celebrated hate crime legislation that extends protection to people based on sexual orientation, sealing a long-fought victory to gay advocates.

Just my guess, however I suspect that "hate crime" legislation has little to do with those "protected" and everything to do with enabling trial lawyers to ruin people with predatory lawsuits.

.

14 posted on 10/28/2009 7:52:59 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gator113; Chode

You got that right....now I only wonder where are all those Black Baptists that voted in favor of Prop 8 last year, and also supported Zero just cause he’s black!!!


15 posted on 10/28/2009 8:02:21 PM PDT by Morgana (zero, Harry, Nancy, Only three of them, against the rest of us! Don't forget that America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

Can I still call homosexuals bone smuggling, rump riding, salami swallowing, fags and sodomites on FR? Or aam I breaking the law?


16 posted on 10/28/2009 8:10:41 PM PDT by LeonardFMason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana


17 posted on 10/28/2009 8:18:09 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist *DTOM* -ww- I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LeonardFMason

and mud pumpers and butt burglars and .....


18 posted on 10/28/2009 8:22:07 PM PDT by Quickgun (As a former fetus, I'm opposed to abortion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Ok, well here are my thoughts on the subject.

As those who know me well know, I'm a regular in the Canteen which supports and pays tribute to all of our men and women at home and abaord who are risking their lives on the battlefields for the freedoms we used to enjoy.

I say used for obvious reasons.

I have family and friends in the military and Ft. Sill is not very far from where I live.

However, I have to tell you that were I in Congress right now I would have voted against the defense bill for the very reason that it contained this absolute travesty.

What the Democrats did here was not only despicable but criminal as well. There are clearly some elements in Washington D.C. who obviously have a chip on their shoulders when it comes to the military as well as christians.

I'm not saying we should legislate morality or pry into people's bedrooms. But if I or my pastor or anyone wanted to call a spade a spade in this case, I think we should be able to without having to worry about having law enforcement visit our houses and giving us lectures about how what we're saying is hate speech and we're now on a watch list and all that nonsense.

Take a look at what is going on in places like Great Brittian and Canada for example. You don't think these things are big deals? try telling that to the old lady in one of those Great Brittan communities who was paid a visit by the local police becuase she dared to protest a "gay pride parade" in her city.

She was paid a visit by two police officers. One of whom was sitting opposite her and lecturing her as if she were a bad girl. The other officer was standing in the other side of the room from where the old lady sat and wouldn't sit down. Yes, the old lady was shaken up about all this. I would be too if that were me.

Yes I do have a problem with how the Dems handled this. If you're going to pass a "hate crimes" bill do it in a separate piece of legialation. The military and "hate crimes" have nothing whatsoever to do with each other. Don't go and act like a bunch of clowns and goonies and force people to choose between the values of thir constituents and supporting the military.

What happened here has only served to justify the tremendous animoisty that exists between our "elected officials" and the very people they're supposed to be representating. I can tell you that revolutions have happened in the past because of things far less egregious than this.

And let just say a big thumbs up to our entire congressional delegation here in Oklahoma including Democrat congressman Dan Boren who chose to side with the values that our great state holds by voting against this monstrosity.

The Democrat party is a criminal enterprise and needs to be put out of business.

Regards......

19 posted on 10/29/2009 12:02:48 PM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

Silencing ministers is what the Canadians use their “hate crimes” law for. It’s also what the Canadian Muslims used to prosecute Mark Steyn.


20 posted on 10/29/2009 12:06:54 PM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson