Skip to comments.
US government report recommends blocking popular websites during pandemic flu outbreak
Natural News ^
| 10-29-09
| Mike Adams
Posted on 10/29/2009 9:34:35 PM PDT by mlizzy
(NaturalNews) The US government has issued a new report that recommends blocking access to popular websites during a pandemic outbreak in order to preserve internet bandwidth for investors, day traders and securities clearing house operations. The concern is that a pandemic would cause too many people to stay at home and download YouTube videos and porn, hogging all the internet bandwidth and blocking throughput for investment activities, thereby causing a stock market meltdown.
This isn't an April Fool's joke. It's all based on a public report issued by the Government Accounting Office (GAO), available from their website at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d108.pdf
In this article, I'm going to explain how a pandemic outbreak could theoretically bring down Wall Street. But to get to that, you'll first need to find out what the GAO said in its curious report (see below). Parts of this article are presented as satire, but the underlying facts quoted here are all true and verifiable (links are provided to all sources).
This report in question is entitled, "GAO Report to Congressional Requesters, INFLUENZA PANDEMIC" and includes this subtitle: Key Securities Market Participants Are Making Progress, but Agencies Could Do More to Address Potential Internet Congestion and Encourage Readiness.
(Excerpt) Read more at naturalnews.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: agenda; blocking; flu; government; h1n1; influenza; obama; outbreak; pandemic; popular; swineflu; websites
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-74 next last
As the report explains ... In a severe pandemic, governments may close schools, shut down public transportation systems, and ban public gatherings such as concerts or sporting events. In such scenarios, many more people than usual may be at home during the day, and Internet use in residential neighborhoods could increase significantly as a result of people seeking news, entertainment, or social contact from home computers. Concerns have been raised that this additional traffic could lead to congestion on the Internet that would significantly affect businesses in local neighborhoods, such as small doctors' offices or business employees attempting to telework by connecting to their employers' enterprise networks.
1
posted on
10/29/2009 9:34:35 PM PDT
by
mlizzy
To: All
Please stop by the FReepathon thread and give it a bump. If you haven’t donated yet, please give it some thought.
Thank you!
2
posted on
10/29/2009 9:36:26 PM PDT
by
ButThreeLeftsDo
(FR.....Monthly Donors Wanted.)
To: mlizzy
What idiots calculated that everyone will be youtubing rather than sick in bed?
This is only an excuse for the gummit to get its sticky fingers on the likes of Fox and FR.
3
posted on
10/29/2009 9:36:32 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(ACORN: Absolute Criminal Organization of Reprobate Nuisances)
To: mlizzy
Why are these morons still around when all they seem to do is create heaps of paperwork and fail?
/picardfacepalm
To: mlizzy
Never allow a crisis to go to waste, eh?
5
posted on
10/29/2009 9:38:49 PM PDT
by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: Soothesayer9
"Why are these morons still around when all they seem to do is create heaps of paperwork and fail?"Because a large block of morons vote for them. Who is the moron is the question you should ask.
6
posted on
10/29/2009 9:44:33 PM PDT
by
blackbart.223
(I live in Northern Nevada. Reid doesn't represent me.)
To: mlizzy
7
posted on
10/29/2009 9:46:10 PM PDT
by
swheats
(America! America! God mend thine every flaw, Confirm thy soul in self-control, Thy liberty in law!)
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: HiTech RedNeck
CNN’s Dr. Sanjay Gupta tonight said, the Swine flu is LESS virulent than the seasonal flu!!!
And the prime season was earlier this year!
This whole thing has been a deception, hyped again by the media, and a failure and another theft from the American people.
9
posted on
10/29/2009 9:50:24 PM PDT
by
Freddd
(CNN is not credible.)
To: mlizzy
a new report that recommends blocking access to popular websites during a pandemic outbreak in order to preserve internet bandwidth If they do this, its likely to have an ADVERSE effect on the stock market and cause real panic and civil chaos and distract us from the financial quicksand we're currently mired in.
It is becoming more and more apparent they want 100% CONTROL of the internet, by hook or by crook.
To: mlizzy
I can see the concern.
But if they do something like this. It should require:
- the approval of a judge, just like a warrant.
- a limited timeframe.
- be limited to only the peak hours. And in no case non-working wall-street hours.
- have a specific list of sites identified for the judge to approve and the category of site, (porn, gambling, youtube, online games, etc.
- news organizations such as Fox must not be blocked.
- a quick appeal process for any site that is "miscategorized" or critical to any business process.
- and government should reimburse non-porn and non-gambling sites for lost revenue. based on normal non-pandemic volume.
11
posted on
10/29/2009 9:58:31 PM PDT
by
DannyTN
To: Freddd
CNN let that doc say that!? WOW. Not only that, but they are not even really testing for Swine flu....they do NOT know what kind of flu people have!
To: airborne
So Now it is Bandwidth Rationing for the Good of the Bankers?
Has anyone thought that maybe there are a lot of Businesses that are not Brick and Mortar that depend upon online sales.
So, You’ve read “Unintended Consequences” and “Enemies Foreign and Domestic”?
To: MamaDearest
To: SwedeBoy2
Helping businesses isn’t part of the master plan.
15
posted on
10/29/2009 10:06:20 PM PDT
by
airborne
(I'm from an older generation. When killing the enemy was a good thing!)
To: mlizzy
Shut down popular sites like twitter? The site the Iranian people used when they were standing up to Ahmadinejad?
16
posted on
10/29/2009 10:07:47 PM PDT
by
GloriaJane
(http://www.last.fm/user/GloriaJane)
To: bamahead; abb; ShadowAce; LucyT
17
posted on
10/29/2009 10:10:15 PM PDT
by
~Kim4VRWC's~
(I am Jim Thompson............................Please pray for our troops....)
To: DannyTN
YEP...if they are talking about PORN sites...go ahead....sheesh....anything else...give me a break!
To: Nachum
19
posted on
10/29/2009 10:10:53 PM PDT
by
~Kim4VRWC's~
(I am Jim Thompson............................Please pray for our troops....)
To: mlizzy
“The US government has issued a new report that recommends blocking access to popular websites during a pandemic outbreak in order to preserve internet bandwidth ....”
Doesn't this amount to the exact opposite of what the “Net Neutrality” legislation would be intended to do?
To: mlizzy; June K.
The US government has issued a new report that recommends blocking access to popular websites during a pandemic outbreak in order to preserve internet bandwidth for investors, day traders and securities clearing house operations. The concern is that a pandemic would cause too many people to stay at home and download YouTube videos and porn, hogging all the internet bandwidth and blocking throughput for investment activities, thereby causing a stock market meltdown. Oh, nonsense! There was a time, not too long ago, when the Internet was somewhat 'fragile', that even having a text forum chat with a famous celebrity was a big deal and would lock out many users due to limited bandwidth. Since then its bandwidth backbone has grown in leaps and bounds and can now support high bandwidth content such as video and live streaming.
And besides, from a cultural perspective, isn't that exactly what the policy wonks in DC have always wanted? For us all to be opiated by mindless entertainment while they chip away at our God given freedoms?
What a bunch of bunk!
-- MM
To: OneWingedShark
In this case they're creating a crisis "strawman" and exploiting it before it happens.
Next they'll need our guns to keep us safe during an outbreak.
22
posted on
10/29/2009 10:15:02 PM PDT
by
MaxMax
(Obama can't play in the Olympic reindeer games)
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~; rocco55; thouworm; rxsid; GOPJ; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; ...

.
23
posted on
10/29/2009 10:18:13 PM PDT
by
LucyT
To: mlizzy; All
This is not one bit surprising. Any excuse to stop our free speech. I have a shortwave radio in case they ban talk radio, too.
24
posted on
10/29/2009 10:20:47 PM PDT
by
Sun
(Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...
Thanks for the heads up Kim!
The list, ping
25
posted on
10/29/2009 10:21:13 PM PDT
by
Nachum
(The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
To: mlizzy
HOw bad could the flu be if they can sit at home and watch porn? They could do that at the office like they always do!
To: mlizzy
Bump for later Friday reading
27
posted on
10/29/2009 10:22:41 PM PDT
by
SuziQ
To: HiTech RedNeck
This means that for three hours each day during Rush’s show, there will be too much band width being used, so they will cut his show off...
To: HiTech RedNeck
I have been sick for two days and I have curtailed my bandwithy thingy.
Been sleeping and didn’t feel like being online much.
29
posted on
10/29/2009 10:31:34 PM PDT
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
To: HiTech RedNeck
It sounds like they’re scared to death of non sick people freaking out and communicating with each other while the sick ones are incapacitated. Do they think communication on the net would be worse than during and after 9/11 or what?
30
posted on
10/29/2009 10:34:54 PM PDT
by
~Kim4VRWC's~
(I am Jim Thompson............................Please pray for our troops....)
To: Vendome
That’s what I’m saying, this isn’t directed toward those who are sick..it’s preventing the healthy from communicating. (But why?)
31
posted on
10/29/2009 10:38:34 PM PDT
by
~Kim4VRWC's~
(I am Jim Thompson............................Please pray for our troops....)
To: mlizzy
If they shut down YouTube videos and porn wouldn't that start the real pandemic?
Seriously now, I think all this and the man made swine flu is just a betta test. One day, when they fix all the glitches, they'll hit us with everything all at once.
To: 1_Rain_Drop
I had a little bit of pork for dinner in celebration.
Hopefully, feel better in the morning and will have a BLT, even though I don’t really eat swine. I am doing so in protest and in hopes that it will cure me.
33
posted on
10/29/2009 10:55:10 PM PDT
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Thats what Im saying, this isnt directed toward those who are sick..its preventing the healthy from communicating. (But why?)
Because they intend to declare martial law during a pandemic? I don't know, that's the only thing I could think off.
34
posted on
10/29/2009 11:03:58 PM PDT
by
Ticonderoga34
(Free Obama's Birth Certificate!)
To: Ticonderoga34
I hope not... I just can’t believe internet traffic would be worse than 9/11.
35
posted on
10/29/2009 11:07:56 PM PDT
by
~Kim4VRWC's~
(I am Jim Thompson............................Please pray for our troops....)
To: mlizzy
anyone that is stoopid enough to rely on the internet for a critical function of their business is a fool
build you own private network if its that important
36
posted on
10/29/2009 11:11:44 PM PDT
by
sloop
(pfc in the quiet civil war)
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; ...
37
posted on
10/29/2009 11:40:17 PM PDT
by
bamahead
(Avoid self-righteousness like the devil- nothing is so self-blinding. -- B.H. Liddell Hart)
To: LucyT
Indicates fear and desperation, IMO. Create an emergency and block communication. Must be frustrating that the ‘swine flu’ won’t co-operate. What’s next? A ‘terrorist’ attack maybe?
38
posted on
10/29/2009 11:43:18 PM PDT
by
Fred Nerks
(fair dinkum)
To: Vendome
I have been sick for two days and I have curtailed my bandwithy thingy. I had it a couple of weeks ago...I was hardly on the computer at all for a few days. I was too puny, sleepy, achy and prone to chills to want to sit at the keyboard.
39
posted on
10/29/2009 11:46:20 PM PDT
by
Allegra
(It doesn't matter what this tagline says...the liberals are going to call it "racist.")
To: SwedeBoy2
Well, the rationale they’re using is for the entirety of the world’s financial markets, so basically anything produced.
But it’s a straw man on top of a straw man. All that goes on on separate networks. I’m a US treasury trader, and we have a completely separate fiber connection to the exchange.
So even if you could flood the internet, it wouldn’t affect the exchanges. I might not be able to log on to my Ameritrade (Scottrade, etc) account from my home internet connection to sell Google or whatever, but the vast majority of trading doesn’t touch the internet.
And of course, the image of this incredibly fragile and crowded internet is a joke. Iphones might lag if everyone jumped on the 3G cell networks at once, but the communications companies laid so much fiber from the 90s up until now that we’re not going to run out of capacity because people are home sick.
40
posted on
10/29/2009 11:53:38 PM PDT
by
BobbyT
To: BobbyT
Thank You for the Information concerning the Net.
I had thought that the Net was deliberately designed to be Decentralized and self healing in that if there was a disruption in service in one location It would automatically reroute.
There may be temporary overloads going through Hubs and switches but it would eventually dissipate.
We sometimes have overloads on the Intranet at work But it does not last very long.
To: mlizzy
The US government has issued a new report that recommends blocking access to popular websites during a pandemic outbreak,...Substitute "conservative" for "popular" and you'll get their real goal. Just declare a "pandemic" and then use that to shut down dissent. It's so simple, even a caveman could do it.
42
posted on
10/30/2009 3:20:09 AM PDT
by
meyer
("I went to Europe to buy the Olympics for Chicago and all I got was this silly Nobel")
To: Freddd
This whole thing has been a deception,.....It’s win-win for Obama. If there is NO large outbreak, we will hear “WE kept it from happening.” If there is a large, uncontrollable outbreak we will hear “It would have been worse if 0Bama hadn’t prepared us.”
43
posted on
10/30/2009 3:33:17 AM PDT
by
Safetgiver
(I'd rather die under a free American sky than live under a Socialist regime.)
To: meyer
44
posted on
10/30/2009 4:35:00 AM PDT
by
houeto
(I peered inside the Treasury's door and alas, the entire vault was empty. We've been robbed!)
To: LucyT
The concern is that a pandemic would cause too many people to stay at home and download YouTube videos and porn, hogging all the internet bandwidth and blocking throughput for investment activities, thereby causing a stock market meltdown.What liars! How many *sheeple* out there really believe this? Don't answer...I know there are too many lemmings that are happy to have the govt. LEAD them off the cliff.
45
posted on
10/30/2009 4:57:10 AM PDT
by
azishot
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
(But why?)
To limit organized resistance to martial law.
Some of us know hamthrax to be no worse than the normal flu. If bammy's stormtroopers make their move using the pretext of flu, we'll fight.
46
posted on
10/30/2009 5:10:11 AM PDT
by
Dr.Zoidberg
(Warning: Sarcasm/humor is always engaged. Failure to recognize this may lead to misunderstandings.)
To: Freddd
CNNs Dr. Sanjay Gupta tonight said, the Swine flu is LESS virulent than the seasonal flu!!!
Do you have a link perchance to this information?
47
posted on
10/30/2009 5:38:34 AM PDT
by
mlizzy
("It is impossible to walk rapidly and be unhappy" --Mother Teresa of Calcutta.)
To: blackbart.223
Who is the moron is the question you should ask. Probably 62% of the American people who didn't use their computers BEFORE the election 2008???
48
posted on
10/30/2009 5:49:34 AM PDT
by
danamco
To: DannyTN
I can see the concern. The only concern you should have is to tell guvernment the stay the hell out of our business and life in general!!!
49
posted on
10/30/2009 5:55:10 AM PDT
by
danamco
To: LucyT
Thanks for the “I need to buy a ham radio” ping!
50
posted on
10/30/2009 6:18:40 AM PDT
by
IrishPennant
(Liberty, when it begins to take root, is a plant of rapid growth. ~George Washington)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson