Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Is Behind Quashing the Birth Certificate Issue?
Canada Free Press ^ | August 25, 2009 | By Joan Swirsky

Posted on 10/30/2009 6:07:00 AM PDT by MelSmith

In an explosive interview by Dr. Laurie Roth on her syndicated West Coast radio show on August 7th, Douglas Hagmann—a respected journalist, director of the Northeast Intelligence Network and longtime private investigator, and Judi McLeod, a prolific journalist and the managing editor of Canada Free Press—the reason for the media blackout about the birth-certificate issue was nothing less than organized Mafia-like dire threats to members of the media issued not only from the heads of major TV and radio stations but also from Federal Communication Commission officials!

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: article2section1; birthcertificate; birthers; blackout; bob152; certifigate; eligibility; fcc; ineligible; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamabirth; obamatruth; obamatruthfile; threats; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-128 next last
Read the whole article!

Thanks to "thethirddegree" for identifying this story.

1 posted on 10/30/2009 6:07:01 AM PDT by MelSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MelSmith

The Nixonian use of the FCC should be a major issue. But it will never be mentioned. Kind of like that attorney who got fired for investigating ACORN. In and out of the news quicker than you can blink your eye, but should be a major scandal. Much more serious about of power than say a Valerie Plame.


2 posted on 10/30/2009 6:10:50 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MelSmith; penelopesire; seekthetruth; television is just wrong; jcsjcm; BP2; Pablo Mac; ...

* A major TV talk-show host reported that he was ordered not to raise the birth certificate issue or risk losing his job.

* FCC officials threatened to yank broadcasting licenses, break up conglomerates, and make the enactment of the Fairness Doctrine “look mild” in comparison to other consequences.

* In at least one corporate TV headquarters, memos were circulated to all on-air employees not to mention the birth certificate issue, as well as other specific subjects like Obama’s Illinois lawyer’s license, his college records, etc., under both implied and explicit threats.

*snip*

But they did tantalize listeners with descriptions of meeting with “sources” outside of St. Patrick’s Cathedral in New York City, a high-placed contact looking nervously over his shoulder, references to directives and warnings given by “those at the top,” and the undisguised threat of one executive to his underlings: “This is serious, and so will the consequences be if anyone chooses not to be a team player with this.”

This comes as no surprise to Fox watchers who have noticed that the Stalinist-style censorship of the Obama regime is already here. This couldn’t possibly be because of the healthy shares of stock the Saudis bought in Fox, could it?

If so, why would the Saudis care so much about quashing potentially damning revelations about Obama? Have they also bought shares in Obama?


3 posted on 10/30/2009 6:11:58 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
As I said in my other post, it appears that courage and principles are in short supply these days (outside of the armed forces).

At this point, our only hope may be the elections in November of 2010. If we can elect to Congress true conservatives and patriots (instead of just Republican party politician-careerists), then we can have a proper investigation that can get to the bottom of this.
4 posted on 10/30/2009 6:13:40 AM PDT by MelSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; pissant; MestaMachine

Ping.


5 posted on 10/30/2009 6:14:35 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar (A mob of one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MelSmith
I get the feeling all these judges that are rejecting the lawsuits are saying that the time for the judciary was before the election, now that the election is over it's up to the legislative branch through impeachment.

And not a chance of that until after the midterm elections and Republicans get some power back.

6 posted on 10/30/2009 6:15:02 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MelSmith

My take is that the judges, etc, know that there will be intense violent civil unrest if 0bama is removed due to ineligibility.

They need to understand two things - first, the upholding of the law is of utmost importance, and that riots will pretty much be contained in their own neighborhoods, causing upwards of 100’s of dollars in damages.


7 posted on 10/30/2009 6:15:17 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MelSmith

BTTT


8 posted on 10/30/2009 6:15:20 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar (A mob of one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; null and void

PING

There is also a group of left-wing trolls infecting FR that post to every thread distorting the facts concerning the BC issue.


9 posted on 10/30/2009 6:15:37 AM PDT by stockpirate ("if my thought-dreams could be seen. They'd probably put my head in a guillotine" Dylan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MelSmith

“59 million Americans joined hands and shouted at the top of their little lungs, `Yes, We Can March off This Cliff.’”

I would applaud their lemming-like jump if it were not for the fact that America itself is chained to them.


10 posted on 10/30/2009 6:16:09 AM PDT by Salamander (I'm sure I need some rest but sleepin' don't come very easy in a straight white vest.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MelSmith
I really do think that our government has become indistinguishable from organized crime. There may be a few people who are honest reformers who hope to get elected and fix things -- but there is a concerted effort to get those people off the stage.

I think things are getting sloppy and it's becoming harder and harder to hide the truth. If the American people wake up and find out that it's all a game and that they are the patsies, there will be Hell to pay. Some folks will be hanging from lamp posts before it's all over.

11 posted on 10/30/2009 6:17:55 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Play the Race Card -- lose the game.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

“And not a chance of that until after the midterm elections and Republicans get some power back.”

*If*.

I expect ACORN’s election fraud machine to be a political Juggernaut, by then.


12 posted on 10/30/2009 6:18:32 AM PDT by Salamander (I'm sure I need some rest but sleepin' don't come very easy in a straight white vest.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MelSmith

Agreed. We don’t have the right players in the right places at this time.

Makes it pretty obvious why all of this socialism is being crammed into the shortest timeframe imagineable, though.


13 posted on 10/30/2009 6:21:50 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

And NOBODY kept a copy for publication?


14 posted on 10/30/2009 6:23:16 AM PDT by I am Richard Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate
Undeniable disruptions.., baiting and belittling. And as noted by others, and affirmed by the religion moderator, that is not allowed on the rel forum. Maybe time to update the fr protocols a bit.
15 posted on 10/30/2009 6:23:21 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8 (I am Jim Thompson............................Please pray for our troops....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MelSmith

Thanks for posting this story MelSmith. I haven’t gotten to posting any articles yet but I guess it’s about time I learned. This particular story has some legs and is worth everyone archiving on their hard drives before it ‘disappears’.


16 posted on 10/30/2009 6:28:42 AM PDT by thethirddegree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MelSmith

It is possible that the mafia cadre supporting this narcissist- seduced him into believing that a BC cover-up could be perpetrated for at least four years - while he & his co-conspirators imposed Marxism on the US?

The crisis that would erupt if the truth were exposed is also a form of blackmail on those who have the facts and are loathe to start a civil uprising.

Between a rock and a hard place.


17 posted on 10/30/2009 6:28:48 AM PDT by sodpoodle (Never give up- Keep Up!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salamander; All

9-2-09
News Corp. in Talks for Stake in Saudi Firm

DUBAI — News Corp. is in talks with Saudi billionaire Prince Alwaleed bin Talal to take a stake in Rotana Media, marking its first major investment in the Middle East, according to people familiar with the deal.

News Corp. may buy a 20% interest in Rotana from Prince Alwaleed, who controls Saudi conglomerate Kingdom Holding Co., a person involved with the deal told Zawya Dow Jones.

It’s not clear at this stage whether the deal will be for existing stock or new shares. A formal bid valuing the stake is expected this month, the person said, without giving specifics on price.

News Corp., which owns Dow Jones & Co., publisher of The Wall Street Journal, is increasingly looking into new markets as advertising revenue in the U.S. and Europe slips. A stake in Rotana could help expand News Corp.’s presence to the more than 300 million people in the Arab world.

Rotana, which hosts Fox channels in Saudi Arabia via its TV network, owns rights to more than 2,000 Arabic movies and a large music library.

Kingdom Holding as of last year said it holds a 5.7% stake in News Corp. It has long-established business links with the family of Rupert Murdoch, the chief executive of News Corp.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125185102212377833.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Saudi Billionaire Boasts of Manipulating Fox News Coverage
Press Release | December 7, 2005

WASHINGTON—Accuracy in Media (AIM) is urging a full inquiry into a report that a Saudi billionaire caused the Fox News Channel (FNC) to dramatically alter its coverage of the Muslim riots in France after he called the network to complain.

The Saudi billionaire, Al-waleed bin Talal, is a friend of News Corporation chairman Rupert Murdoch and controls an influential number of voting shares in the company. “This report underscores the danger of giving foreign interests a significant financial stake in U.S. media companies,” declared Cliff Kincaid, editor of Accuracy in Media.

The controversial comments came at an Arab media conference featuring representatives of Time magazine, USA Today, PBS, The Wall Street Journal, and other news organizations. The conference and the Saudi Prince’s growing influence in News Corporation are among the subjects of a new December-A AIM Report that has just been posted at the AIM website (http://www.aim.org).

The report raises the specter of Arab money influencing News Corporation and other U.S. media companies. Liberal journalist Danny Schechter, a participant in the conference, reports that Al-waleed, who is a member of the Saudi Royal Family and investor in the Fox News parent company News Corporation, gave an interview boasting that he had called Fox to complain about coverage of the “Muslim riots” in France.

He said he “called as a viewer” and “convinced them to change” the coverage because “they were not Muslim riots but riots against poverty and inequality.”

And “they changed” the coverage, the Saudi reportedly said. Another report on the comments, carried by the Dubai-based newspaper the Khaleej Times, says that Al-waleed personally called Rupert Murdoch to complain. The Saudi said, “After a short while, there was a change” in the coverage.

An AIM call to Fox News asking for comment was not returned. This is not the first time that Al-waleed has made controversial statements. His $10 million contribution to a 9/11 fund was rejected when he blamed the terror attacks on U.S. Middle East policy. Fifteen of the 19 terrorist hijackers on 9/11 came from Saudi Arabia.

http://www.aim.org/press-release/saudi-billionaire-boasts-of-manipulating-fox-news-coverage/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Saudi prince takes News Corp stake
By Saeed Shah
Wednesday, 7 September 2005

Rupert Murdoch’s attempts to retain control of his News Corp media empire got a boost yesterday after his ally, the Saudi investor Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, took a 5.5 per cent stake in the company’s voting stock.

Mr Murdoch was forced to put in place a “poison pill” defence at News Corp, in November to stop a hostile takeover bid after a rival media magnate, John Malone, took an 18 per cent share in the company’s voting stock. News Corp has two classes of stock, with the Murdoch family owning 30 per cent of the key voting shares.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/saudi-prince-takes-news-corp-stake-505839.html


18 posted on 10/30/2009 6:30:52 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MrB
"My take is that the judges, etc, know that there will be intense violent civil unrest if 0bama is removed due to ineligibility."

Your premise is incorrect: I don't believe a judge could remove Obama from office. All they could do is identify the truth of the matter, with respect to the birth documentation. At that time, it would probably be up to the legislature to remove him through impeachment. The important thing is to get to the truth of the matter, (regardless of whether Obama is removed from office).
19 posted on 10/30/2009 6:31:00 AM PDT by MelSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~

Yes it was very interesting to see the mods ping an anti-birther to a birther thread, regardless of their excuse for doing so.


20 posted on 10/30/2009 6:31:33 AM PDT by stockpirate ("if my thought-dreams could be seen. They'd probably put my head in a guillotine" Dylan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MelSmith

I know, Carter ruled that the judiciary can’t remove a president,

but everyone understands that declaring him ineligible forces the hand of the legislature to actually deal with the situation,

and they don’t want to be the instigators of that.


21 posted on 10/30/2009 6:32:50 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: All

*snip*

And as I reminded you, AlWaleed is the sleazy, keffiyeh-encrusted Saudi who, just after the 9/11 attacks, offered then-New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani a $10 million check, if America would change its foreign policy on Israel, implying that the Israelis are morally equivalent to the 9/11 Islamic terrorist hijackers. And he supported Palestinian homicide bombers.

Now, Prince AlWaleed has declared he’s upped his (Kingdom Holding’s) stake in News Corp to 5.7%. Alwaleed also owns Rotana Media, the company that has the exclusive rights to broadcast FOX News Channel in Saudi Arabia.

But that’s not the news here. The news is that AlWaleed Bin Talal’s 5.7 percent share of News Corp. is about to jump even higher because Rupert Murdoch and News Corp. are increasing their incestuous business holdings in Saudi Arabia and Prince AlWaleed’s media ventures there. Murdoch and New Corp. are looking to buy 20% of Rotana, and apparently the deal will be for an exchange of News Corp. stock.

Yes, not only will AlWaleed yield even more control over what’s shown on FOX News–the way he did with the Paris Muslim riots, but Murdoch and News Corp. will likely take further steps to please their new Saudi patrons. The given reason for News Corp.’s investment in Rotana is that it needs new markets, due to falling ad revenue in the U.S. and Europe.

http://www.debbieschlussel.com/8331/rupert-murdoch-fox-news-parent-co-increase-ties-w-extremist-saudi-prince-seeking-share-of-arab-street/


22 posted on 10/30/2009 6:34:41 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Oh, great.


23 posted on 10/30/2009 6:42:40 AM PDT by Salamander (I'm sure I need some rest but sleepin' don't come very easy in a straight white vest.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MelSmith

I wish we could get one ONE state to pass a law in advance of the 2012 election requiring original documentation of all candidates. My guess is we’ll get to the truth.


24 posted on 10/30/2009 6:43:37 AM PDT by paddles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

I’m not really sure why they would worry about riots. They would just burn down their own neighborhoods.....as in the past.


25 posted on 10/30/2009 6:45:17 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MelSmith

Free The BC!

If there is nothing there, then there is nothing there.
If there is something there, then there is something there.

Seems rather simple to me.


26 posted on 10/30/2009 6:47:49 AM PDT by Macoozie (Go Sarah! Palin/Bolton 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MelSmith
It is more complicated than that. Obama, because his father was, and he is, by the British Nationality Act of 1948, a British citizen, cannot be a natural born citizen. Thus he cannot be impeached because he is not a constitutional president. He is probably a U.S. citizen, though there is even the possibility that has mother, a 60s radical, forsook U.S. citizenship and took her first husband's British citizenship.

The requirements for president are not complicated. Natural born citizenship is defined in a dozen supreme court cases and the source cited in at least four. The most concise and earliest is Minuteman, founder, delegate to the Virginia Ratification Committee, and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Marshall in a case named for a ship. The Venus, 12 U.S. 253, on page 289. A natural born citizen is born of the soil of parents who are its citizens. That definition has never been changed in spite of at least 24 attempts to do so, the last about ten years ago by Orren Hatch. Obama is illegitimate, and no birth certificate need be discovered, not even the one he described having found in Bill Ayres book “Dreams From My Father.”

27 posted on 10/30/2009 6:50:37 AM PDT by Spaulding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MelSmith

Judge David O. Carter is a worm. He has no honor. Hiring a Obama mole in the middle of a case as one of his clerks.


28 posted on 10/30/2009 6:50:52 AM PDT by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

This is interesting (and frightening, but seemingly true).


29 posted on 10/30/2009 6:52:51 AM PDT by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MelSmith

The “standing” issue was EXACTLY created because the SCOTUS did not want the people or government to recognize exactly how impotent and powerless they are. They can order all day, but what do they command to enforce their decisions? How can a judicial member force an equal branch of government (Obama IS the executive branch) to do anything.

The issue should have been addressed before he was given authority, but people were and are fools.

Now I don’t have hope it will be resolved.


30 posted on 10/30/2009 6:56:09 AM PDT by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Spaulding

Great Post. I will bookmark it and others should read it. Judge David O. Carter sold out his honor, manhood and country.


31 posted on 10/30/2009 6:59:18 AM PDT by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Spaulding
"It is more complicated than that. ..." I understand all that, but if you want to win this battle, we need to focus on on this simple goal first: disclosure of the birth documentation on file in Hawaii. Then we can move onto related issues.

Believe me: all the "natural born" arguments are confusing the public far more than they are helping. In fact, it's apparent that Obama's stooges are counting on that confusion!!

This effort also needs a proper website to explain all this. This information is fragmented all over the place, making it less credible to people who don't understand this subject. Look how few of us were even aware of this CFP article.
32 posted on 10/30/2009 7:04:48 AM PDT by MelSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MelSmith

Now is the time for the states to begin including specific legislation about proof of citizenship, and fact checking of citizenship, prior to being allowed on any ballot. Even if just one state did this, the situation would clear up.


33 posted on 10/30/2009 7:09:31 AM PDT by AD from SpringBay (We deserve the government we allow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paddles
Bill Posey (R) from Florida tried to get this passed in the House, and he was thoroughly thrashed by the Dims and some Republicans for the proposal. He said later that he wasn't talking about this administration, but future administrations.
34 posted on 10/30/2009 7:12:20 AM PDT by Humal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MelSmith

Joan Swirsky writes some of the best stuff on the Interenet. Sadly the newsmedia, judiciary and legislative are bought and paid for. Obama is the Saudis employee and the Saudis are taking over Fox.


35 posted on 10/30/2009 7:12:28 AM PDT by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Humal

Was hoping this republic might be saved by Texas.


36 posted on 10/30/2009 7:14:30 AM PDT by paddles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
If so, why would the Saudis care so much about quashing potentially damning revelations about Obama? Have they also bought shares in Obama?

The Saudis paid for his Harvard Education with a grant from the Ford Foundation. The grant was sent through the Ford from the Saudis. Tim Gitners' parents controlled the Ford Foundation at the time. Why do you think the tax cheat Timmy got Sec. of Treasury?

37 posted on 10/30/2009 7:19:27 AM PDT by bmwcyle (We need more Joe Wilson's. OBAMA is ACORN ACORN is OBAMA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate
There is also a group of left-wing trolls infecting FR that post to every thread distorting the facts concerning the BC issue.

You are absolutely correct, and some have been here for a while.

38 posted on 10/30/2009 7:26:46 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (FUBO - When 0bama Fails, Freedom Prevails!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MelSmith

Re: the media blackout about the birth-certificate issue.

Quinn and Rose have been talking about it every day on their radio show. They are still on the air.

Are they defying the “blackout order” or is it that they just have the moral courage and intellectual honesty to go where no other talking heads dare go?


39 posted on 10/30/2009 7:31:41 AM PDT by Canedawg (Sometimes we live no particular way but our own)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MelSmith

“FREE THE LONG FORM!”


40 posted on 10/30/2009 7:32:33 AM PDT by Dryman ("FREE THE LONG FORM!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle
So you are saying that when Obama was still a teenager, the Saudis handpicked him to be what? President of the United States? That Tim Geitner's father was in on the fix and the quid pro quo was Tim's appointment as Secretary of Treasury?

Do you know how looney that sounds?

41 posted on 10/30/2009 7:34:37 AM PDT by carton253 (Ask me about Throw Away the Scabbard - a Civil War alternate history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate
"There is also a group of left-wing trolls infecting FR that post to every thread distorting the facts concerning the BC issue."

No matter. The truth about all tyrants becomes eventually known. We know all about Stalin, Mao, Castro, et cetera. Even a would-be fascist like Obama with his obsequious mass media will not be able to maintain the lies forever. All efforts must now focus on the elections in 2010. No more faux conservatives!
42 posted on 10/30/2009 7:36:48 AM PDT by MelSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: carton253

The money for his college came by that route. I am not making this up. I said nothing about what happened after college except for his appointment of Timmy. Ask yourself this question. How does a “do nothing” person hide all records of his past and become President? Obama was chosen but not by God.


43 posted on 10/30/2009 7:56:58 AM PDT by bmwcyle (We need more Joe Wilson's. OBAMA is ACORN ACORN is OBAMA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; rocco55; thouworm; rxsid; GOPJ; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

.

44 posted on 10/30/2009 8:00:00 AM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MelSmith

The Canadian Free Press are a distraction, and continue to spout allegations while asserting that they really can’t reveal who was threatened. I don’t know if their objective is site “hits,” but their claims are meaningless. If you really think the notion of “natural born citizen” is too complicated for the masses then perhaps you could help to explain it? Or could it be that you’d like to see the goose chases continue?

For someone to be naturally a citizen at birth, jurists dating from Greek and Roman times, but more importantly, the founders of our country, require birth in the country of citizenship, and parents who are its citizens. Our Constitution only requires natural born citizenship of our president and vice president, because our president is also commander in chief of the military. Is that so complicated?

There are no other definitions. The author of the 14th amendment, John Bingham, reaffirmed the definition above, as have a dozen other cases. Only an amendment to the Constitution can change that definition. Obama is illigitimate. Every bill he signs, every appointment, every treaty, every military order is illigitimate. That seems clear to me. Read the Kerchner/Apuzzo blog or, if he has left his articles intact, the Donofrio blog for more details.


45 posted on 10/30/2009 8:08:40 AM PDT by Spaulding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
The Judge Carter ruling issued yesterday is a good indication of the breakdown of the Constitutional Republic. The judge cited as one of his excuses for not allowing the case to go to discovery that the oval office denizen was elected by the people so the judiciary no longer has jurisdiction to discover whether the oval office resident has defrauded the people in order to usurp the office.

Such convoluted reasoning can only be read as seeking any convenience to avoid honoring the oath the judge took to the Constitution and thus to honor the contract between we the people and the federal oligarchy of which the judge is now a reigning member in fact.

There are several problems with the flawed reasoning --like asserting that the impossibility of plaintiff candidate for presidency, Keyes, being elected eliminated the candidates possibility of being harmed by obama fraud if it occurred-- exposed in the judge's ruling, but that one seems the most egregious. The fix being in was exposed when it was discovered that the judge had recently hired a person who had worked last int he offices of the Pres_ _ent's lawyers at Perkins&Coie.

The issued ruling is so 'progressive in focus' one wonders if the marine on the bench even wrote it! The ruling is so cowardly in speciously excusing the judge from dealing with the case, it is hard to believe an heroic Marine would stoop so low.

46 posted on 10/30/2009 8:11:30 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MelSmith

Everytime I see this article I have to say to myself “Really? Name some names”.

Until then it basically an “unnamed sources” article of so little value.


47 posted on 10/30/2009 8:11:57 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle
I have no doubt that Obama was chosen. I have always said that the danger is not Obama but the man behind the curtain.

But your post linked the funding of his education with the appointment of Geithner as Secretary of Treasury. And that (not you) sounds looney.

48 posted on 10/30/2009 8:12:10 AM PDT by carton253 (Ask me about Throw Away the Scabbard - a Civil War alternate history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
I really do think that our government has become indistinguishable from organized crime.

And no one seems to know what to do or how to do it.

49 posted on 10/30/2009 8:14:02 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (3%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: carton253

It was a pay back. Obama has been using our money to do pay backs since he got in office. Paying back Timmy’s parents is not connecting a long dot.


50 posted on 10/30/2009 8:14:30 AM PDT by bmwcyle (We need more Joe Wilson's. OBAMA is ACORN ACORN is OBAMA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson