Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Levi Johnston Is Trash, Plain and Simple
Pajamas Media ^ | Oct. 30 | AWR Hawkins

Posted on 10/30/2009 1:36:28 PM PDT by AJKauf

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: Tublecane
“Do you think she’d call her son a ‘retard’ in his presence?”

Isn’t the retarded kid a baby? What would it matter if it was in his presence or not. So long as you say it in gentle tones, they have no clue what you’re saying.

I think that the "his" presence refers to in Levi's presence, not the baby's. (The baby has, in all likelihood, never heard that term from either SP or his mother.)

21 posted on 10/30/2009 2:00:36 PM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

Some of my relatives are pretty goofy. I wonder if Star would pay me to talk about them?

Actually, I’m wondering if the Comedy Club circuit would pay me to talk about them. I’d do it, too, except for the fear that some of them might get a gig talking about me...


22 posted on 10/30/2009 2:02:31 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

Perhaps he thinks Brokeback Mountain is in Alaska ...


23 posted on 10/30/2009 2:02:52 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

Just caught a tease of his upcoming *interview* on a local CBS station.

This young stud would not get air-time if he had dated a Kennedy, a Kerry, a Clinton or any other Democrat’s daughter.

Wonder what Chelsea thinks about the state of her parents’ marriage? Has anyone bothered to ask? Thought not!

Despicable detritus.


24 posted on 10/30/2009 2:06:59 PM PDT by sodpoodle (Never give up- Keep Up!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

This just goes to show you that Sarah Palin is STILL a legitimate threat to the left.

As for Levi; he’ll be thrown out like dirty dishwater as soon as they’re through using him (by then he’ll be a junky and a porn “star” sexual deviant).


25 posted on 10/30/2009 2:07:55 PM PDT by aSeattleConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Fathers - your daughters are under your protection until they are married. Keep them away from the scumbags.

And no, this is not an unrealistic viewpoint “in today’s world”.


Amen.


26 posted on 10/30/2009 2:07:57 PM PDT by married21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER

Mr. Johnston is getting paid for all of this, so he certainly should have a garnishment taken out of his pays for child support.

I guess its a hell of a career for him.


27 posted on 10/30/2009 2:08:39 PM PDT by I_Like_Spam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

“Uhmm... it’s not about the baby ‘understanding’ it, but about her calling her child deragatory names in front of other people.”

The quote is, “Do you think she’d call her son a ‘retard’ in his presence?” If the author wanted to say “in other people’s presence,” he should have said so. I was just responding to the words he used.

By the way, when did it become bad to use the word “retard”? I realize Oppressed Minorities force us to call them different things every so often, for no apparent reason other than that the word has gone sour for being associated with them for so long. Hence we call blacks blacks instead of colored, though at one point colored was fine. We also stopped calling midgets midgets, and I still don’t know why, aside from he aforementioned feeling on the midgets’ part that when one word applies to them for any length of time it automatically becomes offensive.

My question is why do we have to go along with them? I could care less if handicapped people and their adocates (/masters) don’t like it. They can grow up. The word didn’t start as a slur, and it isn’t now, except insofar as slurrers have co-opted it. But they don’t own it, and neither do the handicapped.


28 posted on 10/30/2009 2:09:12 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: spectre
"...Do you think she’d call her son a “retard” in his presence?

Those words were never cross her lips in anyone's presence...."

Those words were never cross her lips. PERIOD.

There, your comment needed a little sprucing up.
29 posted on 10/30/2009 2:09:46 PM PDT by NCC-1701 (ON 1-19-09 GAS WAS, ON AVERAGE IN MEMPHIS, $1.43 A GALLON.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bob

“I think that the ‘his’ presence refers to in Levi’s presence, not the baby’s.”

Oh, well, it’s just bad grammar then. Still, saying it in front of Levi isn’t exactly saying it in public.


30 posted on 10/30/2009 2:10:16 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf
This idiot is making himself toxic. Who would want a jerk like this for a boyfriend or future son-in-law?
31 posted on 10/30/2009 2:13:35 PM PDT by colorado tanker (Mr. Flyingsaucerballoonboymediawhoreman - this Bud's for you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

The same types that marry guys on death row.


32 posted on 10/30/2009 2:16:06 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Live jubtabulously!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

That daughter must have really had some high standards! Why’d she go for this loser?


33 posted on 10/30/2009 2:17:43 PM PDT by Slump Tester (What if I'm pregnant Teddy? Errr-ahh -Calm down Mary Jo, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

This idiot is making himself toxic. Who would want a jerk like this for a boyfriend or future son-in-law?

How about the Clinton’s?


34 posted on 10/30/2009 2:18:18 PM PDT by charles1252
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

LOL! How true . . . .


35 posted on 10/30/2009 2:19:24 PM PDT by colorado tanker (Mr. Flyingsaucerballoonboymediawhoreman - this Bud's for you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: All
Why are we arguing over what this punk says, and why even counter the charges he is making?

The real outrage in this story is the driveby media and the Obama administration. THEY are propping Johnston up. Johnston is just a TOOL.

Every time he spouts even the littlest smear, we should be protesting the show, newspaper, network, magazine, etc, that lets him mouth off or publishes his “remarks”.

Please also realize this: The driveby media are doing this for two reasons. First and foremost, the Obama administration is orchestrating this and is encouraging the Left wing press to carry stories about Johnston. This is Chicago style against Sarah Palin, a perceived rival they're very worried about.

George Stephanopolous hosts a conference call EVERY morning with Rahm Emmanuel and John Podesta. They decide then and there what stories get ignored, what stories get airtime, who is in the biggest need of a smear, and which reporter/publisher is on their side and therefore who to direct the story to. Axelrod probably writes a nightly email to Emmanuel after going over it with Obama. So the best thing for our side is to accuse the White House of deliberately supporting the Johnston smears, because it's the truth. This is the way they operate and it worked in Chicago and then the Illinois senate race against Ryan via his divorce records.

The other reason the driveby media is so eager to be the vehicle of these smears is they themselves hate Palin and want nothing more than to see her brutalized politically.

Ask yourself this: Why do the driveby’s even think people are interested in what Levi Johnston has to say? Does anyone think they actually think he's being civil, honest, and trustworthy? Think past the story and consider why they're giving him airtime at all!

36 posted on 10/30/2009 2:21:00 PM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
Why do the driveby’s even think people are interested in what Levi Johnston has to say?

The drivebys know that the sheeple will mindlessly "discuss" whatever the drivebys choose to "report" on, whether it's some slug slandering a conservative statesman or the latest antics of some hollywood slut. Anything to distract from (at the moment) the marxist takeover currently being plotted by Pelosi and 0bama.

37 posted on 10/30/2009 2:24:08 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

***Who would want a jerk like this for a boyfriend or future son-in-law?***

Sadly, many young women from stable, loving, moral families have no exposure to males of Levi Johnston’s ilk. He looked good, probably behaved himself and the innocent Bristol Palin had no idea what kind of cretin he truly was.

My closest childhood friend had a similar experience. Her parents were a caring happily married couple for 60 years. Whe witnessed no drinking, infidelity or domestic violence. My friend sadly, married someone capable of all three - not a clue to his true character until the first baby was born...then it was too late.


38 posted on 10/30/2009 2:27:52 PM PDT by sodpoodle (Never give up- Keep Up!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle
That's why an extended time dating is important, IMHO. Our society is so mobile and most cities are so large that you don't know people the way folks did in the past. A girl really needs to know about a guy before she signs on for a lifetime with him.
39 posted on 10/30/2009 2:34:00 PM PDT by colorado tanker (Mr. Flyingsaucerballoonboymediawhoreman - this Bud's for you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: All

When the worm turns... and it will, on this puke...when they have used him up for what little value he has...He is going to be alone and despised by nearly everyone. Not even a liberal will like or trust him in the end...he is just a redneck cannibal to the lefties.


40 posted on 10/30/2009 2:36:20 PM PDT by uncle fenders
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson