Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

At 3.5% Growth, Economy Won't Recover Until President Palin's Second Term
The Business Insider ^ | 1101-2009 | Paul Krugman

Posted on 11/01/2009 4:29:05 PM PST by blam

At 3.5% Growth, Economy Won't Recover Until President Palin's Second Term

Paul Krugman
Nov. 1, 2009, 11:08 AM

...If we take 3rd quarter growth to be more or less equivalent to average Clinton-era growth, even after 8 years of growth at that rate we’d only expect unemployment to have fallen from the current 9.8% to a still uncomfortably high 6.3%.

It would take us around a decade to reach more or less full employment. As I said in my previous post, that’s well into President Palin’s second term...

[SNIP]

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: economy; palin; realestate; recession
To bad that the reported 3.5% growth reported was due only to the government stimulus.
1 posted on 11/01/2009 4:29:05 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

Growth isn’t the only way to “recover”. In fact, growth alone, is harmful. We need growth in the right areas, and steep reductions in spending, again, in the right areas.

Creativity, Conservatism, Common Sense.


2 posted on 11/01/2009 4:33:28 PM PST by papasmurf (RnVjayB5b3UsIDBiYW1hLCB5b3UgcGllY2Ugb2Ygc2hpdCBjb3dhcmQh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

It would turn around much faster if Reagan style tax cuts along with program cuts were enacted right in the beginning of her first term.


3 posted on 11/01/2009 4:35:06 PM PST by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Indications are that we will have lost 200,000 more jobs as of next week's report, and "official" unemployment will have reached the 10% mark.
4 posted on 11/01/2009 4:35:07 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

You need to have Carter before you can have Reagan.


5 posted on 11/01/2009 4:35:27 PM PST by WakeUpAndVote (Eating corn is pointless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Actually, if President Palin would declare open season on oil/oil shale and gas fields (on- and off-shore), the economy would explode!


6 posted on 11/01/2009 4:35:27 PM PST by SonOfDarkSkies (For good judgment ask...What would Obama do? Then do the opposite!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies
Actually, if President Palin would declare open season on oil/oil shale and gas fields (on- and off-shore), the economy would explode!

Exactly right. And Palin is probably the only strong enough person to see that our resources are tapped.

7 posted on 11/01/2009 4:40:07 PM PST by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blam

Will she also be able to repeal Obama death care and restore the ramshackle health care system to its former greatness?


8 posted on 11/01/2009 4:55:59 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

We also need to stack Congress with lots of REAL conservatives to work with her.


9 posted on 11/01/2009 5:12:31 PM PST by alicewonders (Sarah Palin is the face of America's future.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Actually, President Palin won’t have to do that. It will prove to be so wildly unpopular that it will have already have been repealed by the GOP-controlled House and still narrowly dem-controlled Senate, which will both vote to override Obozo’s veto, in 2011. A previous “health care reform” in 1986, Dan Rostenkowski and them dem’s Section 89 debacle, made the public furious and was repealed by a still democrat-controlled Congress in 1989 by a vote of 390 to 36.


10 posted on 11/01/2009 5:25:14 PM PST by Spartan79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blam

No one is spending. Most (including me) have stopped all unecessary spending because of the socialist agenda in the White House. Everyone is stashing thier cash/assets to avoid the stupidity of “distribution of wealth”. The consumer is shutting this thing down and rightfully so. This administration is not trusted and thier is nothing that they can do to change that. We just have to wait it out until they are gone.


11 posted on 11/01/2009 5:30:28 PM PST by Kryn-Man (Self-righteous, gun-totin', military-lovin', redneck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kryn-Man
"No one is spending. Most (including me) have stopped all unecessary spending because of the socialist agenda in the White House. Everyone is stashing thier cash/assets to avoid the stupidity of “distribution of wealth”."

Yup. But, I did buy a new pocket gun yesterday, a Ruger LCP 380 to take grocery shopping with me.

12 posted on 11/01/2009 5:37:15 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

Presidnet to be Palin would be well advised to start talking about the amount of oil that surrounds this country and how it could change the economy of this country. She really needs to start planting some seeds for growth that are in contrast to the one.


13 posted on 11/01/2009 5:40:40 PM PST by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: papasmurf

How bout growth in savings and debt repayment.


14 posted on 11/01/2009 6:21:28 PM PST by appeal2 (Government is not the solution, it is the problem and eventually the enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
3.5% Growth in the 3rd Quarter? No! Try 0.87%
15 posted on 11/01/2009 6:33:08 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
3.5% Growth in the 3rd Quarter? No! Try 0.87%
16 posted on 11/01/2009 6:33:37 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: appeal2

I don’t know why we don’t have a firm National policy on savings. Although, if we did, they’d just keep exempting and/or lowering it, just like they do with the debt ceiling.

Congress really is the problem, and that’s why we have 2 year terms for them. We need to exercise that option often.

As far as repayment, we’d have to borrow to do it, unless we get creative and take bold market based very Capitalistic steps towards that goal. We could do that. I could 4 or 5 ways to do it. So, why can’t those that we send to DC do it?

Most Americans are completely unaware that we are making payments on our debt by borrowing more money. They’ve been appeased into stupidity by the left. 1+1=2. That will never, even for the left, change.


17 posted on 11/01/2009 6:46:45 PM PST by papasmurf (RnVjayB5b3UsIDBiYW1hLCB5b3UgcGllY2Ugb2Ygc2hpdCBjb3dhcmQh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: papasmurf

Perhaps Obama should appoint a savings Czar, lol. He could force you to take manadatory withholding from your paycheck to be put into a government savings program where you earn t-bill rates of interest and help the government to lower the deficit. What a world?


18 posted on 11/01/2009 7:49:42 PM PST by appeal2 (Government is not the solution, it is the problem and eventually the enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: blam

Paul Krugman is incompetent. Its his candidate and his policies that have ruined the economy.


19 posted on 11/01/2009 7:54:24 PM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: appeal2

We’d do better if we bought one McDonald’s share each week, and not do anything for 25-30 years. Trust me on this one. hahaha


20 posted on 11/01/2009 7:59:06 PM PST by papasmurf (RnVjayB5b3UsIDBiYW1hLCB5b3UgcGllY2Ugb2Ygc2hpdCBjb3dhcmQh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: papasmurf

But McDonald’s is an evil company and they will run afoul of the Cholesterol Czar. And they are not a green company. Look at all the garbage they produce.


21 posted on 11/01/2009 8:03:09 PM PST by appeal2 (Government is not the solution, it is the problem and eventually the enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: appeal2

“But McDonald’s is an evil company and they will run afoul of the Cholesterol Czar. And they are not a green company. Look at all the garbage they produce.”

Oh, they’ve been VERY “green” for me. :O)


22 posted on 11/01/2009 8:08:12 PM PST by papasmurf (RnVjayB5b3UsIDBiYW1hLCB5b3UgcGllY2Ugb2Ygc2hpdCBjb3dhcmQh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson