Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ObamaCare: A National Version of RomneyCare
Pajamasmedia ^ | November 2, 2009 | Paul Hsieh Page

Posted on 11/02/2009 4:55:02 AM PST by Leisler

The details of Congress’ health care “reform” legislation are finally coming into focus, and it’s not a pretty picture. Congress is essentially proposing a national version of the failing Massachusetts system.

In 2006, Massachusetts adopted a health care plan which included an individual mandate requiring residents to purchase state-approved health insurance, new regulations on insurance companies specifying who they must cover and what benefits they must provide, and a government-subsidized “public option” for low-income residents. Supporters promised a utopia of “universal coverage” which would save money while improving quality of care. However, the exact opposite has occurred — health costs in Massachusetts have skyrocketed, while patient care has suffered.

Before we adopt a similar plan at the national level, Americans should know three things about the Massachusetts plan.

(Excerpt) Read more at pajamasmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: karlmarx; obama; romney
Newt down, Mitt next.
1 posted on 11/02/2009 4:55:02 AM PST by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Leisler
Your personal decisions will be made for you by bureaucrats to whom you're just a number on a sheet of paper.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find only things evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelogus

2 posted on 11/02/2009 5:01:50 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leisler

My premiums went way up in Taxachusetts and now I probably pay for 5 people’s free health insurance thanks Romneny! Most states do not have the number of good hospitals that Massachusetts has, just in Boston alone, so even though the plan is a disaster here, elsewhere it would be even more so.


3 posted on 11/02/2009 5:11:41 AM PST by Boardwalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boardwalk

Everything in this world must be paid for. It’s either direct and clear, or indirect and unclear.

If indirect and unclear, consumers, suppliers, and other actors, are unable to factor in rational choices. The systems starts to operate on garbage information, errors that have to be paid/covered occur at ever higher rates.

Higher rates call for more reforms of the previous reforms that are no longer the reforms but now morphed into problems.

And so on.


4 posted on 11/02/2009 5:50:29 AM PST by Leisler (We don’t need a third party we need a conservative second party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Leisler

“Everything in this world must be paid for. It’s either direct and clear, or indirect and unclear.

The reason the House bill runs nearly 2,000 pages is because that’s what’s needed to ensure that Americans have no idea who actually pays for what. That sets up a political environment in which Congress gets to forever be in the middle of the action (skimming off vast sums in political contributions in the process) as one side incessantly demands more lavish benefits and/or more lavish payment rates while others plead to be exempted from the inevitable taxes, surcharges or cost-shifting required to bankroll federal largesse. That’s the formula that has created $89 trillion in unfunded Medicare liabilities.


5 posted on 11/02/2009 7:33:49 AM PST by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DrC

They get hoisted on their own socialist planning petard. Eventually they can not plan because their previous plans have so distorted price that they do not know, and can not know what things cost and how to allocate resources.

Not that they should have any anti-Constitutional control like they already do to order people about, decide prices, make criminals out of ordinary citizens that have no living person complaining about them.

But they do.

Congress, and the various state governments are the enemy. And, I don’t mean politically. I mean physically.


6 posted on 11/02/2009 7:45:57 AM PST by Leisler (We don’t need a third party we need a conservative second party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson