Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HPD Begins Creative Crackdown[Houston]
Click2Houston ^ | 29 Oct 2009 | Mary Benton

Posted on 11/02/2009 11:36:55 AM PST by BGHater

HOUSTON -- The Houston Police Department launched a new creative campaign to crack down on dangerous and aggressive drivers, KPRC Local 2 reported Wednesday.

The plan calls for putting plainclothes officers in different locations around the city to spot drivers who are speeding, not wearing seat belts, or changing lanes erratically.

In one tactic, senior Houston Police Officer William Dodson will dress in street clothes and stand at a street corner with a sign in his hand.

Some people could mistake him for a vagrant, but on closer inspection, they will see that the sign is reminding people to wear their seat belts.

Dodson will radio ahead to an officer in a marked HPD unit who will make the stop and issue a citation.

"You can see the drivers start to pull on their seat belts," said Dodson.

"This is about safety on our freeways," said HPD Capt. Carl Driskell with the Traffic Enforcement Division.

So far this year, HPD has recorded 179 traffic fatalities.

Most of those automobile crashes were alcohol related, and about one-quarter of the people killed were not wearing seat belts.

HPD said it plans to begin its new initiative this week.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: donutwatch; houston; nannystate; plainclothesofficers; police; revenuetickets; seatbeltlaws; speeding; sting; texas; tickets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Absurd.
1 posted on 11/02/2009 11:36:56 AM PST by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BGHater

This police department has too much money. A budget cut would clarify priorities nicely.


2 posted on 11/02/2009 11:41:04 AM PST by donna (Sarah Palin: The Feminist ideal comes to fruition in the Republican Party. Betty Friedan laughs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1riot1ranger; Action-America; Aggie Mama; Alkhin; Allegra; American72; antivenom; Antoninus II; ...

Be seeing you.

3 posted on 11/02/2009 11:41:10 AM PST by a fool in paradise (I refuse to "reduce my carbon footprint" all while Lenin remains in an airconditioned shrine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
Why you can never find a cop when you need one Pictures, Images and Photos

Lots of dangerous drivers in front of this shopping center...

4 posted on 11/02/2009 11:42:26 AM PST by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Nice that seat belt violations are the biggest crime in Houston.


5 posted on 11/02/2009 11:43:16 AM PST by rbbeachkid (The ONLY ones able to fix the economy - Small Business Owners!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Yup, more spying brought to you by the nanny state.

I still remember them saying “Oh we will never use this as a primary offense, its only a secondary ticket for seat-belts”

Now its the main focal point of these kind of “stings”

How silly. Its NOT the govts biz if I wear my seat-belt.


6 posted on 11/02/2009 11:43:56 AM PST by eXe (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donna

The mayoral candidates say how they will put more officers out on the streets.

How about scaling back the number of multi-officer ticketing operations and put them on PATROL instead?

What’s more, the officers say that Houston streets are too dangerous (too much violent crime) and that they want all patrol cars to have 2 officers. If the officers don’t feel safe in this town, how are the citizens supposed to feel about driving around alone at night?


7 posted on 11/02/2009 11:44:30 AM PST by a fool in paradise (I refuse to "reduce my carbon footprint" all while Lenin remains in an airconditioned shrine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

The City of Austin began doing this a few months ago using police in city buses. The buses would drive along freeways with a cop watching for violators. He’d radio a unit on the feeder and it would come out and pull the violator over.


8 posted on 11/02/2009 11:44:40 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbbeachkid

They’ve added a BACKSEAT seltbelt requirement for all passengers as well (September 1st).


9 posted on 11/02/2009 11:45:22 AM PST by a fool in paradise (I refuse to "reduce my carbon footprint" all while Lenin remains in an airconditioned shrine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
I always wear my seat belt and I don't speed but my husband calls me a serial lane changer. I think it is because I look as far ahead of me as possible and I change lanes to avoid being behind, the bus, a garbage truck, road construction etc. I accuse Mr. Ditter of rarely looking farther than the car ahead of him.
10 posted on 11/02/2009 11:46:26 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

I don’t live in Houston, but around here, my observation is that most traffic issues are caused by three things.

1) Equipment failure/malfunction/disuse (no brake, stop, turn signals, or the inability to use them)

2) Improper lane usage - failure to stay right, failure to yield the right of way.

3) Poor maintenance. Bald tires, atrocious alignment (or lack of it), worn brakes.

But I never see the police going after these types of drivers, even though anyone driving sees them everywhere.


11 posted on 11/02/2009 11:51:43 AM PST by chrisser (Tweet not, lest ye a twit be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chrisser

Make that four things

4) Driver distractions. Kids, cell phone, putting on makeup, reading the newspaper, texting, whatever.

A woman almost rear-ended me this morning. She was on a cell phone and reading a book(!) while driving. I can’t help but admire her a bit - she must have some skillful legs with which to drive as her hands weren’t available.


12 posted on 11/02/2009 11:53:54 AM PST by chrisser (Tweet not, lest ye a twit be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

I just get in the lane I’m going need and stay in it, unless I encounter someone going waaaaay too slow.
Of course, from my experiences on GA 400, I’m the one most people think is going too slow.


13 posted on 11/02/2009 11:57:37 AM PST by Little Ray (Obama is a kamikaze president aimed at the heart of this Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

I’d be happier if they’d solve the 18 unsolved arsons we’ve had in the Heights instead of playing seat belt nanny.


14 posted on 11/02/2009 12:04:03 PM PST by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Absurd and complete bs. HPD goes after soft targets. OK seat belt violations are one thing, but illegals riding around with no tags, no inspection sticker or registration, and ignoring the traffic laws don’t get stopped. Plus, with the ecomonic activity down, the city of Houston is really hurting in the tax money downturn. For the last 18 months, there has been LOTS of traffic enforcement on the roads, close to triple than before. This is just about tax revenue.


15 posted on 11/02/2009 12:05:04 PM PST by Texas resident ( Doing my part to piss off the heathen left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimt

Maybe they figure the arsonist is a non seatbelt wearing monster.


16 posted on 11/02/2009 12:06:11 PM PST by Texas resident ( Doing my part to piss off the heathen left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rbbeachkid

Yup, we have no other crime issues in this town.

The main reason for this “crackdown” is it is a revenue producer.


17 posted on 11/02/2009 12:09:22 PM PST by A Texan (Oderint dum metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: donna; BGHater
This police department has too much money. A budget cut would clarify priorities nicely.

Exactly. I agree with you. A department that has undercover officers to spare, and can devote resources to going after normal citizens is a department that has too many officers.

As you say, a budget cut would clarify their priorities.

18 posted on 11/02/2009 12:09:39 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texas resident
This is just about tax revenue.

They always say it's about safety, but in the end, real safety takes a back seat to revenue. Just look at the red light cameras. If they really wanted safety, they'd lengthen the yellow lights by a second or two (or add a second of dead time, where all lights are red) so that traffic could clear the intersection, but that would mean a loss of $.

19 posted on 11/02/2009 12:26:38 PM PST by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

“”This is about safety on our freeways,” said HPD Capt. Carl Driskell with the Traffic Enforcement Division.”

LOL, no one w/ a brain believes that whopper. It’s rarely about safety and all about $$$.


20 posted on 11/02/2009 12:32:44 PM PST by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson