You are the one who is not rising to the challenge, diaper boy. I just told you that your fellow droolers in the Temple of Darwin have no explanation for the origin of life, darwood’s main evo-religious predictions are falling one after the other, not least of which is darwood’s so-called ‘tree of life.’ Indeed, it has gotten so bad for the Temple of Darwin that even the evos are abandoning the HMS Beagle in search of a new God-denying evolutionary ship. I know you will find this hard to believe now, but once you are past the diaper stage, darwood’s evo-religious creation myth will leave you red-faced with embarrassment. Although, given your screenname, I doubt that will happen anytime soon.
>>You are the one who is not rising to the challenge, diaper boy. <<
OMG stop it! stop it! You are making me double over in laughter!
>>I just told you that your fellow droolers in the Temple of Darwin have no explanation for the origin of life,<<
And you just keep ignoring the fact that abiogenesis has nothing to do with TToE. You have been told hundreds, maybe thousands of times, but your ears and eyes and little brain are permanently closed.
>>darwoods main evo-religious predictions are falling one after the other, not least of which is darwoods so-called tree of life. Indeed, it has gotten so bad for the Temple of Darwin that even the evos are abandoning the HMS Beagle in search of a new God-denying evolutionary ship. <<
Only in your fantasy world. In the real grown-up world where real scientists do real science your little Batboy articles aren’t even acknowledged. And the real world understands that believing in God has nothing to do with using science to understand His Universe.
>>I know you will find this hard to believe now, but once you are past the diaper stage, darwoods evo-religious creation myth will leave you red-faced with embarrassment. Although, given your screenname, I doubt that will happen anytime soon.<<
Keep repeating yourself in the face of facts. You are such a little boy. And using my screenname as an issue shows just how much of a little boy you are.
What a fool you are. As I said, the only reason I engage you at all is to let the outside world know that you do NOT represent Conservatives and instead are a small example of an outlyer who tries to get attention by screaming like a wittle baby in the grocery store.
Intelligent Conservatives understand science. Foolish little babies do not.
I just told you that your fellow droolers in the Temple of Darwin have no explanation for the origin of life
And I just explained to you that the evolutionary theory does not address the origins of life
It is no valid objection that science as yet throws no light on the far higher problem of the essence or origin of life (Darwin, Charles. The Origin of Species. 6th edition, 1882. p. 421
repeating the same falsehood over, and over again does not make it true
Darwin's theory became widely accepted science after the rediscovery of Mendelian genetics, and the works of Ronald Fisher, Edmund Ford and others. It's just as widely accepted today as it's ever been, if not more so.
However, Darwin's theory of Pangenesis was rejected by science, which is something you can't explain if he's some type of religious figure.