Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This does not mean that independents are turning into Republicans. G.O.P. ratings are still in the toilet. But it does mean the Democrats have to fight to regain some of their most crucial supporters.

Brooks is missing the point that there are now a lot of former Republicans who are calling themselves Independent until the GOP gets the message and completely retools.

1 posted on 11/07/2009 2:51:50 AM PST by Thebaddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Thebaddog

In August, polling showed that a significant (election changing) percentage of otherwise apolitical Independents agreed-in-principle with the conservative/libertarian (small’c’ and small ‘l’) message of the Tea Party Movement....

The Bipartisan Washington Elite Establishment ignores this to its own peril....


2 posted on 11/07/2009 3:00:47 AM PST by Uncle Ike (Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Thebaddog

I grew up in NC and moved to Va. When you register to vote in Va it’s as and independent. When I moved back to NC was so pissed @ the GOP for becoming Democrat lite and registered as and independent. I’m actually a conservative. Jesse Helms is my hero.


3 posted on 11/07/2009 3:12:08 AM PST by personalaccts (Is George W going to protect the border?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Thebaddog

Yrp, Brooks always misses the point. He’s as delusional as any other NYTImens faux Conservative.


4 posted on 11/07/2009 3:18:39 AM PST by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Thebaddog
Note to faux Conservative David Brooks.

You seem unwilling to address the fact that “independents” were attracted to the Dems by a set of carefully constructed campaign lies by the Democrat Party Propaganda machine.

How quickly Mr Brooks you forget the 2008 promises of your idol Dear Reader i.e. “Tax cuts for 95% of Americans) “Most transparent Administration in History” “Energy Independence in 10 years) etc etc etc

What is the one thing the bulk of “Independents” consistently vote against? Fiscally irresponsible spending and corruption.

They fired Bush and the GOP based on the notion that they had become entranced in the corrupt practices of DC and were irresponsible with the people's money.

They hired Obama on the mistaken notion that he was going to ride into DC clean up the corruption (Most open administration in history) who would be a “post racial” president while giving “tax cuts to 95% of Americans”.

Slowly, because the “Independents” are sheep easily lead by the Junk Media, the “Independents” are waking up to the fact that Dear Reader is every bit as corrupt while being even more irresponsible with the Public Purse.

Independents are at heart conservatives in outlook. The recent Gallup poll validated that data.

A bold Conservative agenda that focuses on the traditional values of the USA (fiscal responsibility, open, honest, smaller Government, moral accountability in leadership, a principled strong national defense, while also presenting a serious rational approach for addressing such issues as Energy Independence, real health insurance reform, and lead by someone untainted by the inherent corruption of DC will attract them in droves to GOP candidates. It did last week in VA, in NJ, and it will in 2010

5 posted on 11/07/2009 3:30:13 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Note to the GOP: Do not count your votes until they are cast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Thebaddog

I’ll tell him what I want. I want a government that lives within its means.


7 posted on 11/07/2009 3:40:49 AM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Thebaddog

To varying degrees substantial numbers of voters are schizophrenic. These voters often demand actions that are contradictory. For example, they demand more programs and then complain about government spending. Because the programs these voters demand often affect the rights of others who in turn look to lobbyists to present their views. Then those who demanded these new programs bellyache about lobbyists. Some people aren’t happy unless they have something to complain about.


8 posted on 11/07/2009 3:42:12 AM PST by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Thebaddog
but mostly because of anxious suburban independents who think he is moving too fast.

No, that's not it. It wouldn't help if he did the same thing more slowly. It's what he's doing, not the speed at which it is being done.

10 posted on 11/07/2009 4:03:35 AM PST by Old_Grouch (62 and AARP-free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Thebaddog
A lot of what drives people who are fans of Brooks is a discomfort with a belief in God. They think it's OK to go to church once in a while but to put principles ahead of expediency is something that must just not be done.

The Terri Schiavo tragedy and intelligent design -- and how those matters were/are played by the dying media -- turned a lot of them away.

And now it's just starting to dimly dawn on some of them why you have to put principles first.

15 posted on 11/07/2009 5:21:26 AM PST by Tribune7 (I am Joe Wilson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson