Posted on 11/08/2009 9:04:07 AM PST by dila813
ABU DHABI, United Arab Emirates — The U.S. Homeland Security secretary says she is working to prevent a possible wave of anti-Muslim sentiment after the shootings at Fort Hood in Texas. Janet Napolitano says her agency is working with groups across the United States to try to deflect any backlash against American Muslims following Thursday's rampage by Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, a Muslim who reportedly expressed growing dismay over the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The shootings left 13 people dead and 29 wounded. Napolitano was in the United Arab Emirates on Sunday for talks with security officials and a meeting with women university students in Abu Dhabi.
(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...
CAIR?
How about anti-Homeland-chief sentiment. Are we allowed to have that?
Being as the terrorist sat on one of her own freaking panels...words fail to express my disgust with her.
And if it was a Christian who walked into a mosque and shot it up screaming quotes from the New Testament ?
“Napolitano was in the United Arab Emirates on Sunday for talks with security officials and a meeting with women university students in Abu Dhabi.”
........
Giving the enemy our plans no doubt.
Since the guy shouted Alluha Akbar before he opened fire, it was clearly a terrorist attack. Maybe he was just acting by himself, but it was still terrorism! What is wrong with these jerks????
My own personal backlash is against clueless freakin' libtards who won't take the threat of domestic jihadis seriously!
Yes, most Muslims over here are not a problem-- but gosh darn it, we need to do some serious scrutiny of suspicious behavior.
Sunlight doesn’t reach, how deep-in over their heads everyone in this administration is.
I heard this and couldn’t believe it. They are more concerned about anti-Muslim backlash than really keeping us safe.
I feel like I am living in a totally different country.
This official Jihad Denial is getting downright kooky. This government is like a Fellini Circus.
If they need some examples of how it's done the need look no further than the speeches and sermons after an abortion clinic is bombed or an abortion doc is murdered in the name of God.
I’m sure Janet would feel the same way if a citizen on the right committed a crime ... she would be “oh so concerned” that people didn’t paint all conservatives with that brush...
Islam should be treated like the German American Bund was in the 1930’s. I’ve said that LITERALLY for years.
Everyone, educate yourselves. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_American_Bund
>>Looks like everyone was right on the board, the White House is controlling the press and the coverage associated with the Fort Hood Shootings.<<
Yes, but the press is getting weaker while the internet gets stronger. And so far he cannot control that.
No, the groups are MSNBC, NBC, ABC, all these terrorist misinformation agencies etc....
Can there be any doubt that Obama and the Democrats are working to sabotage our country? Jihadists have infiltrated our military and are involved in a program of murdering Americans every chance they get. Our tax dollars are being used to protect these Jihadists and make sure no one interferes with their mission. Wake up America. How much more evidence do you need?
What would be wrong with an anti-Muslim backlash?
The news is: “President bravely confronts Americans to prevent backlash against Muslims.”
Y’all know what he’s talking about, the rising public violence against Muslims, the backlashes we keep hearing about, but never see, bible thumping, gun toting Christians attacking innocent Muslims while they worship peacefully in their mosques.
The left would love it, just so they could spend the next fifty years using it to defend every kind of anti-Americanism that comes down the road. They want it so much, they imagine it happening, and make speeches to stop it.
You are too hard on terrorists, whats wrong with swapping spit with a terrorist anyways?
Terrorists are the enemies of Bush after all, and the enemy of my enemy is my friend, haven’t you heard? /sarc
Wasn’t it Janet and “her” agency that EMPLOYED THIS MAN???
How about warning us of the very muslims who want to kill us?
Islam has declared WAR on the West, you shiite-for-brains idiot.
Attempting to mitigate our people's RIGHT to defend themselves, or to fight back in every way against this aggressor, is TREASON.
Of course, there will be a backlash, you dolt. That's what sane people do when they're attacked. They respond in kind.
It was violence with a political aim, that is terrorism.
These idiot press writers need to drop the extreme PC Bias, it ain’t working.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2230484/posts
We are the terrorists not that murdering mussie.
Maybe if we sacrafice a few more soldiers and citizens we can fill their appettite for the rest of the year. What a disgrace
Exactly!!
So a terrorist kills unarmed men and women on US soil, and as a result HS says they are working to protect Muslims?
Well, Hussein did vow to protect them at all costs.
Just heard from the nitwit from South Carolina on this subject. Not worth repeating. But it’s increasingly weird how silent Juan McCain has become on controversial issues and how often we are hearing from Lindsey. It just might be related to Juan’s reelection bid in 2010. Time to leave the backstabbing and undermining to others for a year or so.
>> Homeland chief warns against anti-Muslim backlash
Shouldn’t they be worried about the anit-American frontlash.
It would be nice, for once, for the government to stop presenting us as a bunch of reactionary assholes. It’s getting old.
Yeah, they did such a swell job with that after 9/11.
Wow, even when they attack us the story is how awful we are.
No bias there, huh?
The fact that she's not tells us all we need to know to understand that she's going to end up doing a perp walk right into federal court to be tried for treason.
Different story or someone changed the title, but I can see the writer of the story did a cut an paste job, but still two different headlines.
Drive-by leaves family dead, Mayor warns against anti-gang backlash
Ah! Another “man made incident”, or whatever she calls them.
Wouldn’t it be wonderful if she secured the homeland, instead of worrying about [non-existent] threats to the Muzzies? You know, like maybe, keeping an eye on people like the shoooter?
I think it would be great, it is about time.
The Obama administration and liberals in general don’t give a damn about any body’s safety but their own. They are content to have policies that use the rest of the populace as guinea pigs for their insane PC policies.
At Fort Hood, these policies got 13 people killed.
Let's not jump to conclusions.
versus
2). A warlike, religiously fanatical culture that is unrestrained in reproduction, adept at merciless guerrilla tactics and is not adverse to using civilian populations for cover and the illusion of assimilation.
What are the odds that #1 survives?
Good one!
And anti-leftist-liberal-socialist sentiment as well.
pOTUS won't even say he acted stupidly...shaking head
The Congress already voted to give the Prez power over the internet.
Standing up and speaking out about Moslem atrocities is the way you get murdered.
I see no way out of this dilemma other than banning adherents of Islam from America. The belief system is incompatible with life here.
I am not surprised that she hasn’t issued an alert for local terrorists opposed to Pelosi/ObamaCare
The way to prevent the backlash is to prevent terrorist attacks by Muslims on our soil.
And in case you forgot, you camel carpet muncher, that's SUPPOSED to be your JOB.
Cheers!
Quoting the name used by KFYI 550 AM's talk show host, Bruce Jacobs, for Napolitano.
Would the MSM even notice if some Mosques got shot up by some girl scouts?
I use to give “some” muzzies a break, however that is no longer the case.
Call me a racist or whatever else you want.
I distrust ALL muzzies. I wish all their churches, err,......terrorist hideouts and bunkers would close today and deport every last one of them.
Their freedom of religion in America license needs to be revoked.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.