Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Far From a Lab? Turn a Cellphone Into a Microscope
NY Times ^ | November 7, 2009 | ANNE EISENBERG

Posted on 11/08/2009 7:19:51 PM PST by neverdem

MICROSCOPES are invaluable tools to identify blood and other cells when screening for diseases like anemia, tuberculosis and malaria. But they are also bulky and expensive.

An engineer at U.C.L.A. has adapted cellphones to do the work of microscopes in screening for diseases.

Now an engineer, using software that he developed and about $10 worth of off-the-shelf hardware, has adapted cellphones to substitute for microscopes.

“We convert cellphones into devices that diagnose diseases,” said Aydogan Ozcan, an assistant professor of electrical engineering and member of the California NanoSystems Institute at the University of California, Los Angeles, who created the devices. He has formed a company, Microskia, to commercialize the technology.

The adapted phones may be used for screening in places far from hospitals, technicians or diagnostic laboratories, Dr. Ozcan said.

In one prototype, a slide holding a finger prick of blood can be inserted over the phone’s camera sensor. The sensor detects the slide’s contents and sends the information wirelessly to a hospital or regional health center. For instance, the phones can detect the asymmetric shape of diseased blood cells or other abnormal cells, or note an increase of white blood cells, a sign of infection, he said.

Dr. Ozcan’s devices provide a simple solution to a complex problem, said Ahmet Yildiz, an assistant professor of physics and molecular cell biology at the University of California, Berkeley.

“This is an inexpensive way to eliminate a microscope and sample biological images with a basic cellphone camera instead,” he said. “If you are in a place where getting to a microscope or medical facility is not straightforward, this is a really smart solution.”

Neven Karlovac, the chief executive of Microskia in Los Angeles, said that some of the company’s products would be adaptations of regular cellphones. For phones without cameras, or phones...

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: cellphone; microbiology; microscope; microscopy

1 posted on 11/08/2009 7:19:55 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Good idea


2 posted on 11/08/2009 7:21:57 PM PST by wastedyears (My 15 seconds of fame are on my profile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

They have invented a medical Tricorder like on Star Trek.. :)


3 posted on 11/08/2009 7:24:35 PM PST by ColdSteelTalon (Light is fading to shadow, and casting its shroud over all we have known...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Best wishes with this. Of course, with Obamacare destroying the incentive for free market exploitation of good ideas, it may never see the light of day.


4 posted on 11/08/2009 7:26:58 PM PST by Liberty1970 (God: He who honors Me, I will honor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty1970

If Waxman did not invent this then we probably do not need it. Socialism will provide to each according to his needs!


5 posted on 11/08/2009 7:29:46 PM PST by omega4179
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

... there’s an app for that.


6 posted on 11/08/2009 7:34:14 PM PST by pgyanke (You have no "rights" that require an involuntary burden on another person. Period. - MrB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I’ve fooled around with the optics required to see really small things, my experience is that you need at least a couple hundred dollars worth of glass to make this happen. The lens on a cell phone isn’t high enough quality to discern the details required for this type of work.


7 posted on 11/08/2009 7:34:34 PM PST by AlbertWang
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlbertWang

It is obvious that you just ‘fooled around’ with optics.

It is also obvious you didn’t read the article since they are getting 3D holograms from which they reconstruct high res 3D images.

It helps to read PRIOR to commenting.

Lurking’


8 posted on 11/08/2009 7:43:23 PM PST by LurkingSince'98 (Catholics=John 6:53-58 Everyone else=John 6:60-66)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ColdSteelTalon

LOL... My first thought.....


9 posted on 11/08/2009 8:01:13 PM PST by united1000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LurkingSince'98; Mother Abigail; EBH; vetvetdoug; Smokin' Joe; Global2010; Battle Axe; ...

I wasn’t aware that holograms were made from interference patterns. With the right software imaging programs, this might be able to recognize telltale morphology of various microbes in different samples of blood, saliva, etc.


10 posted on 11/08/2009 8:07:25 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
So how simple of a device is used on Ozcan's RAZR?
/lame joke
11 posted on 11/08/2009 8:12:51 PM PST by FreedomOfExpression
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlbertWang
There have been several articles in the literature lately about applying a sample directly to the imagers focal plane, it makes a serviceable microscope without any lenses.

When you look up at a clear blue sky and see the 'floaters' in your field of view, you are seeing the shadows of individual blood cells and other cellular debris inside your eye.

No lenses between them and your retina...

12 posted on 11/08/2009 8:17:13 PM PST by null and void (We are now in day 291 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: united1000

Kirk: Is he allright Bones?

Bones: He’s dead Jim..

:)


13 posted on 11/08/2009 8:18:24 PM PST by ColdSteelTalon (Light is fading to shadow, and casting its shroud over all we have known...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Interesting article. I’ve done a lot of work with polarizing microscopes and SEMs.


14 posted on 11/08/2009 8:43:58 PM PST by Retired Chemist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Retired Chemist
Same here -- plus differential interference (Nomarski & Francon-Yamamoto) and IR and dark field optics.

The cellcam bit sounds like my first homemade microscope (@ age 10) -- the lens from a penlight bulb...

15 posted on 11/08/2009 9:00:47 PM PST by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Damnit, Jim, I'm just a random dialer!

Smile

16 posted on 11/08/2009 9:11:47 PM PST by 70times7 (Serving Free Republics' warped and obscure humor needs since 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdSteelTalon; neverdem
They have invented a medical Tricorder like on Star Trek.

Hmmm....
too late....The Israeli, has been using an electronic hand-held
medical device (in combat) during the Lebanese conflict.
according to Israeli Media reports.


17 posted on 11/08/2009 9:19:13 PM PST by skinkinthegrass (Zer0 to the voter: "Welcome to 'MY' DeathCARE ® Plan"...Sucker! ...now just die. :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
its the digital camera that does the trick. The wireless and audio features of what makes a cell phone a cell phone don't have much to do with this, or am I missing something?
18 posted on 11/08/2009 9:19:59 PM PST by seastay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I need Karnac’s power to really deduce what ‘magic’ it was they pulled off here ... suffice to to say, the use of a 2-D focal plane solid-state imaging array (as used in a cell phone or cheap camera) is the heart of this device; said researcher, however, didn’t just order several focal plane array imagers from a vendor or chip supplier, but rather adapted already constructed devices to a different purpose, saving him the trouble of designing/developing the hardware/firmware drivers (incl software) to make the imagers usable (extracting the 2-D array of ‘light’ data appearing on the top of the sensor/imager chip) ...


19 posted on 11/08/2009 9:34:26 PM PST by _Jim (Conspiracy theories are the tools of the weak-minded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

Those Israelis... They have everything. :) God bless em.


20 posted on 11/08/2009 9:53:09 PM PST by ColdSteelTalon (Light is fading to shadow, and casting its shroud over all we have known...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ColdSteelTalon
Those Israelis... They have everything. :)
God bless em.

He has.


21 posted on 11/08/2009 10:02:11 PM PST by skinkinthegrass (Zer0 to the voter: "Welcome to 'MY' DeathCARE ® Plan"...Sucker! ...now just die. :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: seastay; _Jim
its the digital camera that does the trick.?

I got that impression. I don't have a cell phone, so I have no first hand experience other than taking on someone else's cell phones.

The wireless and audio features of what makes a cell phone a cell phone don't have much to do with this, or am I missing something?

I had the impression that the wireless ability can transmit the images. Maybe _Jim could clarify any misconceptions.

22 posted on 11/08/2009 10:16:53 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

Ditto :)


23 posted on 11/08/2009 10:31:46 PM PST by ColdSteelTalon (Light is fading to shadow, and casting its shroud over all we have known...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: _Jim; seastay; neverdem
They're simply taking a pic of a flat surface with monochromatic light, so the image is a hologram. They're not actually looking at images of the cells, just the phase/interference info recorded in the camera's sensor array from combined reflections unique to that "surface finish". The surface is composed of a monolayer of ~2μm high discs with a diameter of ~8μm for red blood cells and ~2μm larger for white cells. It may someday provide for RBC and WBC counts/densities.
24 posted on 11/08/2009 11:12:29 PM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: AlbertWang
I’ve fooled around with the optics required to see really small things, my experience is that you need at least a couple hundred dollars worth of glass to make this happen. The lens on a cell phone isn’t high enough quality to discern the details required for this type of work.

Ever hear of a "simple" microscope? The first microscope ever invented used a polished glass bead as the lens and produced sharp images at several hundred magnifications, although the image was dim due to a small aperature. The sample to be viewed had to nearly touch the lens, due to the short focal length. Today it would be a simple matter to install such a spheric lens above the sensor of a cell phone. A glass microsocpe slide could be laid directly onto the cell phone if the lens was recessed just a bit.

25 posted on 11/09/2009 2:01:29 PM PST by TexasRepublic (Socialism is a parasite that kills the host)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
They're not actually looking at images of the cells
The result, AFAIAC is an image; reiterating, capturing the 'data' off the 2-D array results in 'an image'; imagery. Not to be construed with anything else, being very generic in application here since I know sqat about the size or nature of what they're trying to capture or characterize. I would spend more time on the subject, but more pressing matters present themselves.
26 posted on 11/09/2009 6:49:26 PM PST by _Jim (Conspiracy theories are the tools of the weak-minded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I had the impression that the wireless ability can transmit the images.
That's my take also; they got themselves a 'twofer' with this creation!
27 posted on 11/09/2009 6:51:58 PM PST by _Jim (Conspiracy theories are the tools of the weak-minded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
Re: They're not actually looking at images of the cells,...

"The result, AFAIAC is an image; reiterating, capturing the 'data' off the 2-D array results in 'an image'; imagery.

The key element you left out is that I said the pic's a hologram. A hologram is a holographic image, but those images contain no recognizable rendering of blood cells discernable with the unaided eye, or with a microscope for that matter. They look like blank images to the unaided eye. Those holograms can be mathematically scaled up, then converted to magnified images of the cells.

28 posted on 11/10/2009 12:48:45 AM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson