Posted on 11/09/2009 1:29:53 PM PST by steve-b
Socialists suck no matter what color they are.
Name me the last neo-nazi who attacked a military base.
Now name me the last muzzie scumbag who did.
“So where might another McVeighor worsespring from?...”
The mosque around the corner.
From the headline I thought this was about the fairly quick execution of a domestic terrorist (one of the DC Sniper Duo is slated to be executed this week).
Socialists. Typical.
Cries of “McVeigh” are used by the left whenever the truth about the demographics of terrorism become so obvious that they can’t be ignored.
They do it every time.
McVeigh? How about stopping the next Hasan?
It's funny watching the media try to claim with a straight face that Socialists are really right wing.
Big turnout, of course?
Why is anyone wasting ink on this nonsense? Shouldn’t we be worried about stopping the next Bin Laden or the next Hasan?
Every mosque in the country is ripe with McVeighs. Try one and see for yourself. In this day, McVeigh and the “neo-nazis” are the exception and not the problem—get a clue.
Bigots are creeps whether muslim or not.
As they refuse to call the Ft. Hood killer a terrorist.
Jeez, these guys are trying to act like the Muslims in Detroit and New York.
How about we worry about both? Dead is dead, and the victims from OKC are no less dead because McVeigh didn’t happen to be a muslim. Bad guys are bad guys, period.
This is what I call ‘issue clutter.’ We talk about Hasan. They bring up McVeigh. We insist upon talking about Hasan, they will very loudly and very brazenly accuse us of having a double standard and/or excusing McVeigh.
This is not about McVeigh, but if they want to go there, let them. We can get into the Muslim connections.
1. James von Brunn
We need to stop Hussein from killing again.
Tear down the Gorelicker wall.
So the German Democratic Republic must have been both democratic and republican.
Of course it was neither.
The Nazis had a great deal in common with more typical leftist groups, but the similarity of names is not a particularly good argument in itself.
The word “liberal” means a lover and promoter of liberty. Does that fit most liberals in America today?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.