Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama hints: Stupak Amendment will have to go
Hot Air ^ | Nov. 9, 2009 | Allahpundit

Posted on 11/09/2009 3:48:50 PM PST by Free ThinkerNY

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Charles Martel
"Let's go ask Joseph Cao."

I doubt if he will talk to us. ( ^: }

21 posted on 11/09/2009 4:40:56 PM PST by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

He will lose his favorite videos, watching the most innocent having theirs brains sucked out.


22 posted on 11/09/2009 4:43:44 PM PST by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

The Senate has yet to report a bill. If it does report a bill (a big IF), and this is not likely until 2010, then the House and Senate bills must go to a conference committee. It is at that point that the Stupak amendment will be stripped from the bill. Then the conference report must be passed again in both chambers b4 the bill goes to BO for signature.

That is why the GOP was smart to work with pro life RATS to get Stupak attached to the House bill. When the conference report comes back with Stupak stripped, there will be a river of Democratic blood on the House floor, and the conference report will not get through the House. The pro life RATS will have their political cover, because they already voted for Pelosicare on the first round. It also innoculates these RATS with pro life voters.

I hope this helps answer your question.


23 posted on 11/09/2009 5:08:53 PM PST by mwl8787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Anyone who is surprised at Obama’s spin of this are idiots and probably voted for him. Not saying anyone HERE on FR is, but just a general comment.


24 posted on 11/09/2009 5:17:12 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Obama hints…

In reply to two direct questions. I don't even see the hints; just "it's going to take time." For whatever it was he was talking about - which seemed to be until there aren't "strong feelings."

Or whatever.

He makes Clinton look like a straight shooter.

25 posted on 11/09/2009 6:14:43 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson