Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chandler's Disappointing Vote (Extreme Power Barf Alert!)
Lexington Herald-Leader ^ | Nov. 10, 2009 | Editorial

Posted on 11/10/2009 4:23:35 PM PST by GenXFreedomFighter

Ours is the only industrialized nation that doesn't insure all its people, yet our health care costs are the world's highest by far.

That tells us there will be no cure for runaway costs without universal coverage.

Rep. Ben Chandler apparently didn't buy that line of reasoning. He was one of 39 Democrats who joined all but one Republican in voting no on the reform plan that emerged from the House after a daylong debate Saturday.

Chandler cited the cost and his concerns about the bill's effects on rural hospitals and small businesses as reasons for his vote while also saying "there is no doubt that our health care system is broken."

Despite Chandler's reservations, the House moved this country closer than ever to fixing its broken health care system.

The Senate should get busy and finish the job.

Opponents are insisting that Congress and President Barack Obama should forget health care for now and put all their focus on creating jobs as national unemployment tops 10 percent for the first time since the early 1980s.

But reining in the cost of health care is a way to create jobs. The relentless increase in insurance premiums is a drag on U.S. businesses by draining away profits that could go into new job-creating investments.

Likewise, the high cost and unreliability of insurance, especially on the individual market, stifles entrepreneurial activity and discourages people from starting new businesses because they're afraid they won't be able to insure themselves and their families if they leave the security of an employer-sponsored group plan.

The number of uninsured Kentuckians has grown to almost three-quarters of a million people while employer-based coverage is decreasing.

In 2001, 71.3 percent of Kentuckians had insurance coverage through their jobs; it was down last year to 63.5 percent. Nineteen percent of working Kentuckians lacked insurance in 2008, an appalling reality.

What the House passed has the support of the American Medical Association and the AARP. It's not radical or extreme and in a less partisan age would have gotten Republican votes.

The insurance reforms in the House plan, such as requiring coverage of pre-existing conditions, are long overdue and were offered by congressional Republicans in the 1990s as an alternative to the Clinton health care plan.

Americans recognize that health care is a big problem but understandably mistrust anything coming out of Washington. That distrust was fueled by crazy rumors promoted even by some prominent Republicans.

We're not sure what Chandler hoped to accomplish politically with his vote. He endorsed Obama and voted for a cap-and-trade allowance system to reduce the heat-trapping gases that are causing climate change. The energy vote, opposed by coal interests, was probably more politically risky than this one. And he's not going to get right with the tea baggers no matter what he does.

This is no time to let the perfect become the enemy of the good. We would have rather seen Chandler stand up for positive change rather than hunker down with Kentucky's House Republicans who reflexively vote against anything Obama wants, even Rep. Hal Rogers whose constituents have the lowest life expectancy of residents of any congressional district.

Hats off to Rep. John Yarmuth of Louisville, the lone Kentuckian who put his people's interests first.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: obamacare
Isn't this nice ... the media are soooo careful to qualify Major Hasan as the "alleged" Ft. Hood shooter so as to protect his rights as a criminal defendant, though we all know he committed the crime. As they should under our system of law. At the same time, they feel perfectly free to denigrate patriotic people who peacefully protest the excesses of their government by calling them "tea baggers."

We've got to take our country back from these fascists who wield so much influence over our people.

1 posted on 11/10/2009 4:23:38 PM PST by GenXFreedomFighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GenXFreedomFighter

No longer are we blind. We notice these things. You have many at your side.


2 posted on 11/10/2009 4:28:49 PM PST by SteelTrap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GenXFreedomFighter

But reining in the cost of health care is a way to create jobs.

would that be in 2013? that’s when the provisions in the bill would begin...

or, maybe the new jobs will be created sooner, we could hire lots of people to sit and do nothing so they could be in place when it starts....

who puts out these talking points anyway.

how about this: the new Health Care Bill will cause a 1% per year reduction in CO2 emissions and save the planet.

or this: the new Health Care Bill will make all the Islamic fanatics decide to stop trying to kill Americans.

it will balance the budget

whiten teeth

and make you “ripped.”

lets put a big tent over Washington D.C.

since people there are in rapture and speaking in “tongues”


3 posted on 11/10/2009 4:42:07 PM PST by kralcmot (my tagline died with Terri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GenXFreedomFighter
Last year I had a hip replacement.From the moment that I first called for an appointment with an orthopedic surgeon until I was in the recovery room of a major Boston hospital was 6 weeks.And it would have been even less if I had accepted the earliest slot for an MRI that I was offered.

In Britain and Canada I would have had to wait for 18 months for the surgery.

Recently,my sister had cancer surgery.Her wait (first symptoms to recovery room) was 4 days.She would have had to wait weeks...if not months...in the UK or Canada.

That's all I need to know.

4 posted on 11/10/2009 5:05:01 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Host The Beer Summit-->Win The Nobel Peace Prize!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GenXFreedomFighter
Ours is the only industrialized nation that doesn't insure all its people, yet our health care costs are the world's highest by far.

That tells us there will be no cure for runaway costs without universal coverage.

Faulty logic. If we adopt the Obamacare, our health care costs will be even higher; but even if they weren't, some country that had universal coverage would then be the most expensive.

If there were 5 countries that didn't have universal coverage, and all 5 had the highest costs, you might be able to make an argument.

Of course, in fact, we are NOT the only country that doesn't have universal health insurance, and most of those that don't have very low health care costs.

Everything we have is more expensive, because we have the best, and the most. We have instant access to health care most of the world would die for (and are dying for lack of).

5 posted on 11/10/2009 5:19:41 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GenXFreedomFighter

Looks like Ben got the message from the 9/12 group that met with him.

Good job guys!


6 posted on 11/10/2009 5:20:45 PM PST by IMissPresidentReagan (ATTENTION RINOS.: IT'S NOT THAT I'M TOO FAR RIGHT; IT'S THAT YOU'RE TOO FAR WRONG! fubo funp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson