Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barletta to Make Another Run at Kanjorski
Roll Call ^ | 11/10/2009 | Shira Toeplitz

Posted on 11/10/2009 8:36:13 PM PST by Born Conservative

Hazleton Mayor Lou Barletta (R) is likely this week to announce his third bid against Rep. Paul Kanjorski (D-Pa.), according to a Republican source with knowledge of his impending campaign.

Barletta’s entrance into the race likely makes this a top-tier contest for Republicans, who are hoping to pick up a couple of House seats in the Keystone State next year. Kanjorski defeated Barletta in 2008, 52 percent to 48 percent, even though public polls showed the popular small-town mayor in the lead for several months leading up to Election Day.

National Republicans see Barletta as their best candidate to defeat Kanjorski in the 11th district, which President Barack Obama carried last year with 57 percent. National Republican Congressional Committee spokesman Tory Mazzola said in a statement that House Republicans believe the 13-term lawmaker is still vulnerable this cycle.

(Excerpt) Read more at rollcall.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: barletta; kanjorski
Kanjorski Truth File

Paul Kanjorski 2010 Election Cycle

Rep. Kanjorski: $550 Billion Disappeared in "Electronic Run On the Banks"

Federal Dollars are “free money”

Kanjorski: $2 Trillion really isn’t a lot of money

Representative Kanjorski Lies About The Surge

Kanjorski doesn’t apologize to anyone

Kanjorski Sneaks Through Backdoor at Rangel Fundraiser

Paul Kanjorski on Universal Health Care

Rep. Kanjorski on Congressional Pay Raises

Kanjorski’s Cornerstone Scandal

Kanjorski Threads on Free Republic

1 posted on 11/10/2009 8:36:14 PM PST by Born Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tribune7; PGalt; Dr. Ursus

Ping


2 posted on 11/10/2009 8:36:56 PM PST by Born Conservative ("I'm a fan of disruptors" - Nancy Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Political PING?


3 posted on 11/10/2009 8:38:42 PM PST by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

Lou Barletta is a good guy.


4 posted on 11/10/2009 8:42:28 PM PST by Frantzie (Judge David Carter - democrat & dishonorable Marine like John Murtha.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

I wish him well, these people have got to be stop and only changing Congress can start the process.


5 posted on 11/10/2009 8:46:15 PM PST by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

Barletta must have good polling data. I sure hope he wins this time; we could all use him in Washington.


6 posted on 11/10/2009 8:55:21 PM PST by freespirited (Liberals are only liberal about sex & drugs. Otherwise, they want to control your life. --DHorowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

Well, well, well...

7 posted on 11/10/2009 9:04:34 PM PST by freedumb2003 (Communism comes to America: 1/20/2009. Keep your powder dry, folks. Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

He would be on my donation list. We need Lou Barletta in Congress.


8 posted on 11/10/2009 9:08:38 PM PST by Steelers6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

Good development. Pennsylvania needs people like Barletta in Washington.


9 posted on 11/10/2009 9:53:54 PM PST by Think free or die (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money - M.Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy; fieldmarshaldj; Clintonfatigued; BillyBoy; Clemenza

The GOP could be competitive in 8 RAT-held House seats in PA in 2010; Kanjorski’s is actually the most heavily Democrat of the 8, but with Barletta running and the improved electoral environment we have a good chance of picking off this seat.


10 posted on 11/10/2009 10:00:40 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he will protect you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj; Clintonfatigued

Excellent. The third time was the charm for Kline in MN, hopefully here too.

PA will certainly be key to GOP hopes of gaining the house (or coming close).

I count only 7 pickup oppos. 3 4 7 8 10 11 12

You think Holden (17) or Schwartz (13) is vulnerable?

I’m glad to see Kathy “I love the unborn so much I support Pelosi” Dahlkemper seems to have a top tier opponent.

A stronger challenger is need for Patrick Murphy (8).


11 posted on 11/11/2009 2:47:20 AM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

Barletta is a great American. I hope he sends that POS Kanjorski to the garbage heap.


12 posted on 11/11/2009 2:58:10 AM PST by Renegade (You go tell my buddies om Planet' and " Battle of the Worlds " on Blu-ray ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy

I was thinking of Holden’s seat (PA-17). Th district is too conservative to keep sending a Democrat (even a moderate one like Holden) back to Congress. Holden survived 2002 due to GOP Congressman Gekas (with whom he was redistricted together) acting like a senile old fart during the campaign (once he was discovered asleep in his car in the congressional parking garage) and because Gekas never even tried to win votes in the areas that were new to him (and it didn’t help us any that those geniuses in the GOP-controlled state legislature kept heavily Democrat Harrisburg in the district). Since then, he survived a so-so challenge in 2004 and coasted in heavily Democrat 2006 and 2008. Holden is no Pelosi nut, but 1994 (and 2006 and 2008, for that matter) proved that in wave elections having a moderate voting record is not sufficient insulation from the storm that’s coming. If we run a good candidate against Holden, the race should be competitive and we can well win.


13 posted on 11/11/2009 3:24:22 AM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he will protect you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

“Kanjorski defeated Barletta in 2008, 52 percent to 48 percent, even though public polls showed the popular small-town mayor in the lead for several months leading up to Election Day.”
___________________________________________________________

Given that 2008 was stacked against republicans because of 8 years of RINOism, and relentless 1-sided coveraged from the state run media, Barletta’s lost only be a slime margin. I really like is chances in 2010.


14 posted on 11/11/2009 4:31:44 AM PST by TMA62 (TMA62)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle; brityank; Physicist; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; GOPJ; abner; baseballmom; Mo1; Ciexyz; ...

Go Lou!


15 posted on 11/11/2009 6:00:04 AM PST by Tribune7 (I am Joe Wilson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

Good news! Thanks for the ping. GO LOU!


16 posted on 11/11/2009 7:15:55 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

COUNTDOWN TO 2010 (support candidates who will work to nullify federalism)

We honor our veterans today on Veterans’ Day. Our brave military fought for our freedoms. Here’s how a free people use their hard-won freedoms.

FOX NEWS’ JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO SAID IT BEST Free people enjoy the right to use nullification as a protective measure... to have their state legislatures act to prevent federal domination.

A legacy of USSC Taney’s Dred Scott judicial activism, was that the ruling would lay the groundwork for the rights of states to nullify——to make null; to invalidate; to counteract the force or effectiveness of unconstitutional laws.

Nullification in U.S. history, is a doctrine expounded by the advocates of states’ rights. It held that states have the right to declare null and void any federal law that they deem unconstitutional.

Nullification is also a fundamental state right to prevent federal domination. States enjoyed the right to use nullification as a protective measure against
unconstitutional federal laws by making them ineffective against their citizens.

For example, Montana nullified federal gun laws.

HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE After Dred Scott, nullification had become a states’ right tradition, and both the North and the South exercised it prior to 1861
SOURCE .http://www.thefreelibrary.com/
COPYRIGHT 2009 American Opinion Publishing, Inc.

To get your support, the candidate must take a stand to use state govt to nullify the federal govt’s unconstitutional overreaching into our lives.

Demand candidates nullify ObamaCare.


17 posted on 11/11/2009 8:01:37 AM PST by Liz (Obama's the best thing that happened to the Republican Party in a long time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

Thanks for the info.I contributed last time and will do so again.


18 posted on 11/11/2009 8:36:24 AM PST by Dr. Ursus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
As I remember Barletta was leading the entire time until the election.
Never did hear what happened.
19 posted on 11/11/2009 10:33:06 AM PST by AGreatPer (Impeach Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson