Dominic Baronet loved to knock up girls after meeting them on Facebook. He truly deserves the Sperminator title.
Posted on 11/10/2009 10:01:03 PM PST by myknowledge
A British man who got 12 women pregnant after meeting them on Facebook has been dubbed "The Sperminator" by the UK press and his victims.
Dominic Baronet had been wooing young women for years with his smooth internet chatter, the News of the World reports.
Five women are now mothers to his children, another five have had abortions and two are expecting.
Adding to Baronet's shady past is a criminal record for supplying ecstasy and cocaine.
Kerry Martin, 24, told the News of the World she discovered Baronet's cheating ways by keeping a watch on his Facebook page after he broke up with her.
She soon found a congratulations message revealing he had impregnated another 24-year-old woman named Stacy Jones.
When Ms Martin contacted Ms Jones she discovered Baronet had gotten them both pregnant on the same night.
Baronet should be banned from using Facebook in the future, she said.
“We call him the Sperminator as he just goes around getting girls pregnant and doesn’t ever think about the consequences,” the News of the World quoted Ms Martin as saying.
Dominic Baronet loved to knock up girls after meeting them on Facebook. He truly deserves the Sperminator title.
And the girls had nothing to do with the whole process?
He must have a big keyboard.
Nickname.
Ever.
Is he related to Bill Clinton?
Our old “Sperminator-in-Chief”?
Facebook ‘sperminator’ ping!
5 dead children. That makes him a mass murderer too.
I suppose calling him a filthy philandering pig was just too honest for the brits.
Why should he? Britain's generous entitlement system financially rewards single mothers far better than many of them could ever expect to earn by actually working.
I’d file this under “who cares?”
It’s the “mothers’” fault for aborting their unborn babies anyway. Baronet didn’t want them aborted, just the girls he knocked up becoming mothers to his illegitimate out-of-wedlock offspring.
“5 dead children. That makes him a mass murderer too.”
Not to make excuses for his bad behavior, but he had no say in those women’s choices to murder their children. He wouldn’t even be considered “complicit” in their deaths under the current set of laws in Europe or the US. Let’s see you try to stop a woman you’ve impregnated from getting an abortion. You’ll be prosecuted for obstruction of justice.
Makes you proud of our government(s), doesn’t it? /sarc
Have they done any PIXEL testing to prove he was the father?
that makes them murderers, not him. Given the UK’s birth rate and Muslim immigration problems, I’d say this guy is a bit of a hero actually. I’m not gonna condemn him for doing what needs to be done.
In an unrelated story, he was also a fan of eating fresh oysters and drinking pineapple juice.
Yes, no doubt the mothers of these dead children also bear a heavy responsibility. However, he is also guilty - at least as an accessory of some sort. He either encouraged them to get an abortion, or if he wanted the children to be born, he failed to stop the mothers from going forward with their abortions. He is also the one who got them pregnant to begin with. So one way or another, he is complicit in 5 murders.
Thats what I was thinking. You would think women would have learned by now, that they need to take care of themselves...they cant expect the guy to do it. Look what happens. You get stuck..and they dont.
I cant really blame it all on this guy. Its the women that were stupid.
snort
Keep going and you’ll give Ghengis Khan a run for his money, Sperminator.
Good point about him not being able to stop a woman from getting an abortion if she is REALLY determined to get one. However, if he would have kept it zipped, there wouldn’t have been any children to BE murdered in the first place. That still makes him complicit at some level. We can discuss all day who is MORE complicit, but I would think that both bear some responsibility for the resulting abortions (even if the woman is MORE responsible).
I've never seed such a nickname!
Everyone said he was nothing but a little squirt.
oh, I guess I missed the part where he put a gun to a woman’s head and forced her to have an abortion.
This guy is going to have to cough up quite a bit of child support for his seven children.
No. he bears absolutely no responsibility for their “choice”. He could not have stopped them if he wanted to. The ladies have seen to it that men have no say in the choice; as such, the choice alone is their’s and, therefore, the guilt is their’s and their’s alone. And, as I said up thread, Britain needs more men like this.
Wrong!!! The taxpayers will end up supporting them.
Good heavens, haven’t these women heard of birth control? A little condom would go a long way in preventing all this....
It takes two to tango inseminate; only one to exsperminate.
Pills; female condoms; implants; IUDs; foam (still available in Britain); jelly & diaphragms; firmly holding an acorn between her knees...so many ways for a gal who isn't drunk, drugged, or physically overpowered to avoid getting pregnant, if she doesn't wish to.
“And the girls had nothing to do with the whole process?”
These girls aren’t victims here. When these girls are willing to get jiggy with total strangers and not even use any kind of protection, how stupid is that? These girls/women are victims of their own stupidity. If you leave the door to your house wide open, bad things may come in.
Condom
Child
A woman's choice rests on these two options.
“He either encouraged them to get an abortion, or if he wanted the children to be born, he failed to stop the mothers from going forward with their abortions.”
As far as the guy is concerned, he is nothing more than a sperm donor and the donation was received enthusiastically. To spell it out, this was a “hookup” relationship not a romance. Dumb and dumber they get. A culture where irresponsibility is a virtue. We are well past 1984.
“Baronet should be banned from using Facebook in the future, she said. “
Ahh, those crazy nanny stater Brits. If a guy impregnates willing women who are dumb enough not to use protection, it’s not Facebook’s fault, in fact, it’s on their disclaimer when you sign on that anything that you do with any other Facebook member is all your fault, not theirs.
“This guy is going to have to cough up quite a bit of child support for his seven children.”
You may be right about that but I am not familiar with British laws. Let us remember that we are talking about women who chose having unprotected sex with a stranger that they met on the internet. They chose risking impregnation. They chose hooking up with this guy. Why should he be on the hook for child support? Let’s say a woman has sex with dozens or even hundreds of guys in a months time period and discovers she is pregnant. Should the particular donor that supplied the DNA be held responsible for child support? All of the people involved in this are conducting themselves without any consideration of consequence. In my formative years, this sort of thing was less common. We had taboos back then. Then came the battle cry of the sixties, “Burn it all down, man...”
And he chose the risk if impregnating them. He chose to hook up with them. I can't imagine he volunteered to put on a condom.
And he chose the risk if impregnating them. He chose to hook up with them. I can't imagine he volunteered to put on a condom.
If he was chasing after 13 year olds, yes. Since he prefers women his own age, maybe they should take a little responsibility for their own actions and not hook up with internet strangers.
One or more somebody’s dad or brother needs to get a hold of him in a dark alley late one night.
When a girl will sleep with you on the first date, how many other guys did she sleep with on their first date. Both parties are sleeze.
Just another example of the fall of Great Britain.
Well, Ms. Martin, has it ever dawned on you to think about consequences? You did, after all, have a role in this. Would this man have gotten you pregnant, if you weren't trolling around online looking to hook up and succeeded? It's not exactly unexpected under the circumstance, this pregnancy thing.
Same goes for the stupid as dirt women and the doctors.
Speechless.
I HATE the G-d d@mn sixties - it was the decade of the beginning of the end of the United States.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.