Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOOGLE BREAKS TRADITION AND HONORS AMERICA
AIPNews.com ^ | November 11, 2009

Posted on 11/11/2009 10:54:02 AM PST by EternalVigilance

Wow. 

Somebody contact Google and applaud them for customizing their logo to honor veterans, and this after celebrating Sesame Street for the past week.  They dropped their usual PC party, for at least one day, to actually pay tribute to America's veterans with a touching logo involving a faceless veteran with a child at his feet, looking up, and saluting.

Back on Lincoln's birthday, last year, they had to celebrate Darwin's birthday instead.  I was speechless until more inappropriate language came to mind.  And with subsequent custom logos that alert surfers to a special day, their left-leaning web artwork has advertised their values as well.  But today I guess there was no Marxist or rock star, born on November 11, to celebrate.  Or, in wake of the Fort Hood shootings, it would be obviously bad form to supplant something patriotic with a logo reflecting "world citizenship" or tolerance of those with "different" world views.

Either way, I appreciate what they did on this day, however short-lived.  Who knows?  Maybe we'll find out Che Guevera was born on November 12th tomorrow, eh?

Veterans Day



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: google; veterans; veteransday
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-70 next last

1 posted on 11/11/2009 10:54:03 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

What is this google you speak of?

Bing.com


2 posted on 11/11/2009 10:55:44 AM PST by Dr.Zoidberg (Warning: Sarcasm/humor is always engaged. Failure to recognize this may lead to misunderstandings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg

Looks like the pressure created by the massacre at Ft. Hood was too much for them.


3 posted on 11/11/2009 10:56:39 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Partisans only for principle. - America's Independent Party - AIPNews.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

F them I refuse to use their search.


4 posted on 11/11/2009 10:56:58 AM PST by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I prefer Bing’s image. Far better.


5 posted on 11/11/2009 10:58:40 AM PST by benjibrowder (For Neda. May God bless those fighting for freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Yesterday, I ditched google as my start page, after years of using them.

Last night, I saw the google 'droid' commercial - with the crashing meteorites. As the farmer walks up and the capsule opens, all I could think of was ...

"Sunny days, chasing the clouds away..."

6 posted on 11/11/2009 10:59:08 AM PST by Spirochete (Texas is an anagram for Taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Must have got, http://www.bing.com/ Bbbinged.


7 posted on 11/11/2009 11:01:05 AM PST by silentreignofheroes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
 

Go to Bing.com today. Better images. Better searches. And much more pro-American than Google.

 

8 posted on 11/11/2009 11:01:15 AM PST by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg

I love the picture they have up at Bing. I’d post it over here, but it’s in flash.


9 posted on 11/11/2009 11:01:27 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Partisans only for principle. - America's Independent Party - AIPNews.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Look how cheesy and half-assed even this tribute is.

10 posted on 11/11/2009 11:03:23 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I observed it even before this post. Same with Bing.

But of course, MSFT (Bing)and Google advised obama on his election so F*** em’.


11 posted on 11/11/2009 11:04:47 AM PST by max americana (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
Yup looks like Google was forced into being a little patriotic by Bing's example. Kind of like MSDNC and CNN having to report on ACORN after FNC made it the 800 lb. gorilla.
12 posted on 11/11/2009 11:04:50 AM PST by McGruff (We're Going Rogue Baby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Remember you are not dealing with a living thing. Google is a business pure and simple. It’s managers try to give a profitable service. I guess nothing post modern caught their fancy today.


13 posted on 11/11/2009 11:05:18 AM PST by Hans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

14 posted on 11/11/2009 11:05:40 AM PST by Dr.Zoidberg (Warning: Sarcasm/humor is always engaged. Failure to recognize this may lead to misunderstandings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

They’re getting pretty desperate! There must be no commie holidays today.


15 posted on 11/11/2009 11:06:18 AM PST by Redgirl (ibama - it's all about him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

No, honoring veterans is PC too, so this is no surprise from Google. They’ve probably done the same thing in previous years. The left likes to think of veterans as scarred victims of the US war machine. Thus they are a victim class, so the left is willing to honor them — as long as the jingoistic notion that our military personnel might do any actual good in the world doesn’t creep into the message. In other words, the left is willing to acknowledge their suffering and their sacrifice, but not their achievements.


16 posted on 11/11/2009 11:07:11 AM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg

The Bing.com pic. Beats the crud out the g**gles puny offering.


17 posted on 11/11/2009 11:07:15 AM PST by Dr.Zoidberg (Warning: Sarcasm/humor is always engaged. Failure to recognize this may lead to misunderstandings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
 

Bing<br/><a href="http://i37.tinypic.com/2rqj1ua.jpg" target="_blank">View Raw Image</a>

 

Bing.com today

 

18 posted on 11/11/2009 11:07:30 AM PST by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg
Bing sucks.

Search images on Bing for "Obama Failure".

Bing results:

IMAGES 1-15 of 28,200 results SafeSearch off( Change )

Same search on Google:

Results 1 - 18 of about 8,670,000 (0.21 seconds)

So the numbers indicate Google is about eight million times better than Bing.

19 posted on 11/11/2009 11:07:47 AM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hans

It is run by people, though, who make editorial decisions.

And since when have wealthy liberals cared about business concerns when it comes to pushing their leftist ideology?

If that was their primary concern there would never be a leftwing movie that came out of Hollywood. They’d practically all be patriotic family fare.


20 posted on 11/11/2009 11:08:11 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Partisans only for principle. - America's Independent Party - AIPNews.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible

Thanks. That’s marvelous.


21 posted on 11/11/2009 11:09:02 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Partisans only for principle. - America's Independent Party - AIPNews.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Be that as it may, I won’t give the google goons the time of day.

I’ve never failed to find what I need on Bing.


22 posted on 11/11/2009 11:09:09 AM PST by Dr.Zoidberg (Warning: Sarcasm/humor is always engaged. Failure to recognize this may lead to misunderstandings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg

Thanks.


23 posted on 11/11/2009 11:09:55 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Partisans only for principle. - America's Independent Party - AIPNews.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg

You choose a search engine based upon a graphic on their home page?

Wow. Interesting. Brilliant.


24 posted on 11/11/2009 11:10:23 AM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: silentreignofheroes

Wow. I didn’t know about Bing. I just switched from that photo alone. Thank you.


25 posted on 11/11/2009 11:10:53 AM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I almost fell over when I saw that tribute on Google today!


26 posted on 11/11/2009 11:11:23 AM PST by nutmeg (Obamunism is destroying America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Photobucket
27 posted on 11/11/2009 11:12:06 AM PST by mlizzy ("Do not wait for leaders; do it alone, person to person" --Mother Teresa of Calcutta.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mlizzy

Whoops ... a [couple] somebodies beat me to it.:)


28 posted on 11/11/2009 11:13:05 AM PST by mlizzy ("Do not wait for leaders; do it alone, person to person" --Mother Teresa of Calcutta.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
This is Ask.com's everyday pic:

Ask.com

I haven't used Google since I found out they were censoring Chinese web users to placate the ChiCom government.

Screw Google.

Men and women put their lives on the line every day for the cause of freedom.

The least we can do is refrain from using a search engine that shits on freedom.

29 posted on 11/11/2009 11:17:06 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

Someone a couple months ago mentioned Bing,been using it since.

Everyday there is a new picture , the database has all that we look for.

Even oddball stuff like hay bale gardening,the wifes new thing.


30 posted on 11/11/2009 11:17:29 AM PST by silentreignofheroes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mlizzy

That’s a great tagline!

http://www.aipnews.com/talk/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=10022&posts=1#M27968


31 posted on 11/11/2009 11:22:49 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Partisans only for principle. - America's Independent Party - AIPNews.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

I hear ya.


32 posted on 11/11/2009 11:23:44 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Partisans only for principle. - America's Independent Party - AIPNews.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
I just switched from that photo alone.

Yeah, never mind if Bing works half as well.

That is patently idiotic.

33 posted on 11/11/2009 11:27:09 AM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Went there first thing this a.m. specifically to see if they would do anything about Veterans’ Day.


34 posted on 11/11/2009 11:27:43 AM PST by Let's Roll (Stop paying ACORN to destroy America! Cut off their government funding!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible

Yes, Microsoft is known for their pro-America stance. I wonder how long I will have to look to find a thread bashing MSNBC....


35 posted on 11/11/2009 11:32:30 AM PST by Mr. Blonde (You ever thought about being weird for a living?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg
I've stopped using Google too. It's Bing and Ixquick
36 posted on 11/11/2009 11:37:38 AM PST by Tribune7 (I am Joe Wilson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

So the numbers indicate Google is about eight million times better than Bing.


Actually Bing’s big advantage is that it doesn’t give you piles of unrelated crap like Google does.


37 posted on 11/11/2009 11:45:05 AM PST by Beelzebubba (“Personal freedom begins when you tell Old Mrs. Grundy to go to Hell.” -Lazarus Long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

The brilliance is yours mate, extrapolating what I’m thinking from a single thread.

I tip my hat to your superior thought process...


38 posted on 11/11/2009 11:46:38 AM PST by Dr.Zoidberg (Warning: Sarcasm/humor is always engaged. Failure to recognize this may lead to misunderstandings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
So the numbers indicate Google is about eight million times better than Bing.

Which is useful, if the top 28,200 hits didn't suit your needs.

39 posted on 11/11/2009 11:50:18 AM PST by TankerKC (You need to lock it up, Major...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg

Bing’s display is better. That is why Google is noting Veterans Day.


40 posted on 11/11/2009 11:54:07 AM PST by sportutegrl (If liberals could do math, they would be conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Bigger isn’t always better except for Trophy Bucks and Thermonuclear Weapons.

Welcome back.


41 posted on 11/11/2009 11:55:05 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
I’m sure a different “Commander in Chief” had nothing to do with Google’s Change.
42 posted on 11/11/2009 11:55:46 AM PST by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
So the numbers indicate Google is about eight million times better than Bing.

That's a pretty dumb statement.

Ok... now...

Since you look at the artificial numbers from the search results as your guidance to determine which of the search engines is better...

Why don't you go ahead and examine each and every one of those Google search results and report back to us about the relevancy of each one of them. Then do the same with the Bing results.

Chances are that you won't get very far until the result start repeating and start looking very meaningless.

When it comes to Bing's result count of 28,000 versus the 8 million from Google, which one do you think will have the more relevant results and which one do you think will get you a hit on what it is that you're looking for?

The search result count is meaningless and is there mostly as a marketing tool and to impress people into thinking that Google's search engine is better. You are buying into a lie.
43 posted on 11/11/2009 11:56:42 AM PST by adorno (5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I expected to see more Sesame Street tributes today. Seriously what was that? A full week of tributes to a lame liberal state sponsored kid show.


44 posted on 11/11/2009 11:58:59 AM PST by weef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weef

45 posted on 11/11/2009 12:03:52 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Partisans only for principle. - America's Independent Party - AIPNews.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I had to go see for myself to believe you. :-p


46 posted on 11/11/2009 12:13:20 PM PST by ~Kim4VRWC's~ (I am Jim Thompson............................Please pray for our troops....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
I haven't used Google since I found out they were censoring Chinese web users to placate the ChiCom government.

Screw Google.

Men and women put their lives on the line every day for the cause of freedom.

The least we can do is refrain from using a search engine that shits on freedom.

If it is the "least we can do", why aren't you doing it?

Because Microsoft censors, arguably to a much greater extent.

Microsoft and Chinese Censorship. (^) Oh, and they not only do it inside China, but they censored outside China if your search was typed in simple Chinese.

Bing also censors questions about Microsoft. Is Bing Censoring Questions About Microsoft? (^)

Bing also censors results about sex, and not only in China. Sex searches censored on Microsoft Bing (^)

As of two days ago, Microsoft was busy trying to censor a critic who pointed out a large flaw in the Bing cash-back program. Why Microsoft was wrong to silence Bing cashback whistleblower (^)

47 posted on 11/11/2009 12:31:22 PM PST by mountainbunny (Mitt Romney: Would you buy a used car from this huckster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: adorno
Why don't you go ahead and examine each and every one of those Google search results and report back to us

US? You got a mouse in your pocket?

Or maybe you are some kind of royalty with the "us" thing.

Anyway, Prince, do your own research unless you want to pay me.

48 posted on 11/11/2009 12:35:24 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: mountainbunny
If it is the "least we can do", why aren't you doing it?

I am doing it. I use ask.com.

49 posted on 11/11/2009 12:38:44 PM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible

Is bing better than dogpile.com?


50 posted on 11/11/2009 1:37:24 PM PST by Trillian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson