Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barack Obama 'to reject Afghanistan war options in favour of plan with clear exit strategy'
Telegraph ^ | 12 Nov, 2009 | Ben Farmer

Posted on 11/12/2009 9:53:34 AM PST by XHogPilot

Barack Obama is to reject all of the options outlined for increasing troop numbers in Afghanistan in favour of revised plans which include a clear exit strategy, it has been claimed. The report came from a senior administration official close to the high-level deliberations Mr Obama is holding with his war cabinet over the refocusing of the Afghan war effort. The President is said to have raised questions at a meeting on Wednesday that could alter both the size of any possible troop increase and the length of time they are in the country before they can hand over to responsibility to the Afghan government. According to US reports, it is not the first time he has asked for the four options thought to have been presented to him to be rewritten and he is putting up considerable resistance to the strategy put forward by the Gen Stanley McChrystal, the US Nato commander in Afghanistan, to increase troop numbers by 40,000 for a counterinsurgency drive. Other options on the table include sending between 10,000 and 15,000 troops who will focus on training Afghan forces. The latest development came as it emerged that the US Ambassador in Kabul, Gen Karl Eikenberry, has told Mr Obama that a surge of troops was "not a good idea" unless the Afghan government suceeded in reining in the corruption which spurred the Taliban insurgency. Gen Eikenberry, a former military commander in Afghanistan, reportedly cited the erratic behaviour of Hamid Karzai, who was sworn in as President of Afghanistan after his rival Abdullah Abdullah pulled out of a second round of elections because of ballot-rigging concerns.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afganistan; cheeseeating; cowardinchief; cutandrun; flipflop; howtostealanelection; lyingliar; nationalsecurityfail; obama; obamabreakspromises; obamaflipflops; obamalegacy; obamalies; stabbedintheback; wot; youlie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-70 next last
Obama is a tragedy! Our goal in Afganistan should be to eliminate any coherent threat to US interest. Obama doesn't see it that way. He thinks our purpose was to punish the Taliban for supporting Al Queda. Big difference in my opinion.

It seems Obama's new objective is to get out of Afganistan with minimum political damage. He has no interest in protecting the US.

Leadership/Management 101: 1. State an objective. 2. Construct a workable plan to achieve the objective. 3. Allot funding, personnel, and logistics to commence the plan. 4. Measure results to provide continuous feedback to adjust the plan. 5. Repeat.

1 posted on 11/12/2009 9:53:35 AM PST by XHogPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot

He’s trying to win back his base.


2 posted on 11/12/2009 9:55:54 AM PST by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot

It is so obvious that Hussein cares nothing about “winning”, or protecting the US and it’s citizens. Tell me again how this prick got elected?


3 posted on 11/12/2009 9:56:00 AM PST by MGMSwordsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot

You forgot #6. When in doubt (when you don’t have the slighest idea what to do), delay, delay, delay. (And get our kids killed.)


4 posted on 11/12/2009 9:57:40 AM PST by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot

At this point, with the ROEs that our guys have to work with, the half-assed passing recognition of support from the Democrats, the multiple tours, and the politically correct betrayal of our higher military about our enemy(ala Ft. Hood), I’d say it is time to end this - end it now. Let Obama declare HIS defeat and let our soldiers come home. They are worth far too much to waste them on bullshit like this. Let the large northern cities and West Coast metropolis’ deal with the aftermath.


5 posted on 11/12/2009 9:57:47 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot

It is not when we leave; it is how we leave; my preference... victorious! Any other way is not a strategy… it is defeat.


6 posted on 11/12/2009 9:58:17 AM PST by RonnieFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot

LIBERALS DON’T NEED AN “EXIT STRATEGY”, THEY ABANDON EVERYTHING...............


7 posted on 11/12/2009 9:59:10 AM PST by Red Badger (If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot

Obama flip flops.

He called THIS the “right” war.

You LIE.


8 posted on 11/12/2009 9:59:15 AM PST by a fool in paradise (I refuse to "reduce my carbon footprint" all while Lenin remains in an airconditioned shrine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot

Obama’s only strategy is to cut and run. He is uncomfortable fighting his fellow Muslims.


9 posted on 11/12/2009 9:59:24 AM PST by mort56 (He who would sacrifice freedom for security deserves neither. - Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot

So why did the douchbag escalate in the first place? Dja think maybe it was just a head fake to get his agenda through? That kind of dicking around with military personnell is really reprehensible and irresponsible.


10 posted on 11/12/2009 10:01:26 AM PST by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MGMSwordsman
Tell me again how this prick got elected?

Lies and propaganda. Come on! All the "cool" kids are doing it. What are you, a racist? Free money! If we need to force people to buy insurance in this new Obamacare plan, why didn't we just start with legislation to require insurance (from your employer or private coverage) before changing the system for those who LIKE their insurance?

11 posted on 11/12/2009 10:02:05 AM PST by a fool in paradise (I refuse to "reduce my carbon footprint" all while Lenin remains in an airconditioned shrine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot

Lie, lie and lie. That’s all this guy does.


12 posted on 11/12/2009 10:02:32 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger; Revolting cat!

Obama: “Bush’s fault!”


13 posted on 11/12/2009 10:02:52 AM PST by a fool in paradise (I refuse to "reduce my carbon footprint" all while Lenin remains in an airconditioned shrine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot
Until someone hands him a plan that has surrender as an option, he will not accept it.

Photobucket
14 posted on 11/12/2009 10:03:08 AM PST by Bad Jack Bauer (Fat and Bald? I was BORN fat and bald, thank you very much!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot
The Pres--ent is said to have raised questions at a meeting...

Like,
"How can we paint a humiliating military defeat as an endorsement for more Democrats, more fascism & socialism, more misery, and most importantly, more ME in 2012?"

15 posted on 11/12/2009 10:03:40 AM PST by kromike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

The Killing Fields will be back. The Taliban will kill whole villages that backed us. They will kill every woman/girl who learned how to read.


16 posted on 11/12/2009 10:06:24 AM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

“Let Obama declare HIS defeat”

He’s not gonna do that. He’s gonna blame it on Afgani corruption. It won’t be his fault!

“a surge of troops was “not a good idea” unless the Afghan government suceeded in reining in the corruption”


17 posted on 11/12/2009 10:06:59 AM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

Maybe so. Regardless, it’s time to bring them home. We can’t waste them like this any more.


18 posted on 11/12/2009 10:08:12 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

I sympathize, but I believe the best tactic is to call Obama out on the ROE.

Afghanistan is completely winnable, but Obama’s ROE prevent victory and will eventually force defeat. He is getting our soldiers killed. The solution is not to declare defeat but to get the ROE changed. (Or of course for the Chiefs of Staff to ask for Obama’s Birth Certificate).

Don’t give up on the war. If we choose not to win Afghanistan, it’s going to hurt us very badly. No-one will trust American/Western promises for a generation, just like after Vietnam. The Pakistan/Afghanistan axis of evil will grow stronger and more malignant, and our allies (such as they are) in those two countries will get squashed.


19 posted on 11/12/2009 10:08:19 AM PST by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RonnieFan

It is not when we leave; it is how we leave; my preference... victorious! Any other way is not a strategy… it is defeat.


i guess every one would prefer a victory over a defeat ;-)
but then again Nato was allready defeated years ago when “we” started “nation” building in this “region of different tribes who want to live like in the 7th century” (we call it afghanistan).
Why stay if there is nothing left to win?.
Just declare victory to save face and then leave.
This cesspool isn´t worth the death of only one single soldier.


20 posted on 11/12/2009 10:08:55 AM PST by darkside321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RonnieFan

” It is not when we leave; it is how we leave; my preference... victorious!”

Define “victory”.


21 posted on 11/12/2009 10:09:02 AM PST by Jim Noble (We Are Traveling in the Footsteps of Those Who've Come Before)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

My solution is to pull them out and make that country a mass of glass slag.


22 posted on 11/12/2009 10:10:12 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot

Translated:

The WH cannot convince ANY of our European or Pacific allies to contribute ANY more forces, to the contrary, most of these allies are starting to withdraw forces or are scheduled to do so very soon. I can’t name a single foreign leader that Bambi has a close working relationship with, not one. Bush and Blair were tight, Reagan and Thatcher were tight, but now, forget it. I think most foreign leaders, both friends and enemies, privately believe Bambi’s a joke.


23 posted on 11/12/2009 10:11:52 AM PST by moose2004 (Stand up, speak out and stop Obamacare and GE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

This sounds a whole lot like what our government said about the Diem government. I dare say that the Karzai government is no more corrupt than the state of New Jersey or Chicago. Just an excuse for breaking promises.


24 posted on 11/12/2009 10:12:04 AM PST by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

I would define Victory in Afghanistan as “a country which acts as a continual bloody flytrap for the most violent 1% of Muslims from the entire world, while the heart of the country becomes Westernised.”

We can do that standing on our heads: - if our soldiers are allowed to shoot back at the people shooting at them.


25 posted on 11/12/2009 10:13:04 AM PST by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot
Option Surrender Monkey, thy name is 0.
26 posted on 11/12/2009 10:14:59 AM PST by mojito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot
I'm predicting a TV address from the WH with zero wearing a sweater before christmas.
27 posted on 11/12/2009 10:15:20 AM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moose2004
I can’t name a single foreign leader that Bambi has a close working relationship

Zelaya!

Oh, and Raila Odinga.

28 posted on 11/12/2009 10:15:45 AM PST by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Define “victory”. Okay. It is when leaving doesn’t require a strategy.


29 posted on 11/12/2009 10:18:25 AM PST by RonnieFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot

Very well said, but I’m not sure Mama Obama can explain your third paragraph to her arrested adolescent husband.


30 posted on 11/12/2009 10:19:18 AM PST by JohnQ1 (Pray for peace, prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonnieFan
It is when leaving doesn’t require a strategy.

That's pretty good.

31 posted on 11/12/2009 10:21:32 AM PST by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot

Polls!


32 posted on 11/12/2009 10:22:59 AM PST by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the government spending you demand stupid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

“He’s not gonna do that. He’s gonna blame it on Afgani corruption. It won’t be his fault!”

Yep, the White House and the media have been pumping this Afghan corruption storyline for weeks.


33 posted on 11/12/2009 10:23:08 AM PST by Califelephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

In the past century, the best examples of enemies reconstructing to form stable societies are WW II Japan and Germany (West). What they have in common is that, at the end of hostilities, there was no doubt who was defeated. Anything short of that seems to miss the point of a war.


34 posted on 11/12/2009 10:23:15 AM PST by organicchemist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

I would define Victory in Afghanistan as “a country which acts as a continual bloody flytrap for the most violent 1% of Muslims from the entire world, while the heart of the country becomes Westernised.”

We can do that standing on our heads: - if our soldiers are allowed to shoot back at the people shooting at them.


sorry but this is impossible. even in the wildest dreams. Afghanistan will never be something like a westernized country. there for “we” would have to kill every single Man, Woman and kid there and then replace everyone with someone from “europe” or the US. and even then this new “westenized” country would be the “new Israel”.


35 posted on 11/12/2009 10:27:12 AM PST by darkside321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Agree for all of the reasons you said and because we are also helping pacify Russia’s southern flank.

Our people are way too precious for that.


36 posted on 11/12/2009 10:29:41 AM PST by Let's Roll (Stop paying ACORN to destroy America! Cut off their government funding!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
This is their standard exit strategy.


37 posted on 11/12/2009 10:31:26 AM PST by Kozak (USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Reqiescat in Pace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot

We could not stabilize that part of the world if we spent another 8 years or 800 years, so long as Islam poisons their minds. The only solution is so extreme that I won’t even bother to mention it.


38 posted on 11/12/2009 10:33:00 AM PST by TexasRepublic (Socialism is a parasite that kills the host)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot

Stealing defeat from the jaws of victory.


39 posted on 11/12/2009 10:34:44 AM PST by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MGMSwordsman

Tell me again how this prick got elected?

White Guilt, that idiot McCain, and financial sabotage carried out by George Soros (in no particular order)


40 posted on 11/12/2009 10:35:45 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: darkside321

The heart of the country CAN be westernized, in the sense of “women being taught to read and wearing normal clothes”.

We’re not talking about turning it into Rome. We’re talking about stopping Afghanistan from becoming a country-sized Mogadishu.

Kabul and environs was doing sort-of-ok - not exactly a Pashtun Paris, but not breeding legions of crazy people either - until the Taliban invaded and put the women into burqas.

And that’s all we need Afghanistan to be. Sort-of-ok. We train and support their military, we help their fledgling democracy and we use Helmand as a place to kill crazies. We infect another Muslim country with the concept of liberty. This is the Bush doctrine (properly understood) and it is a good one.

What we don’t do is declare defeat just because we can’t make Afghanistan into a Utopia. Do not make the perfect the enemy of the good!


41 posted on 11/12/2009 10:44:58 AM PST by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot

We need to stay until the Afghan Army is capable of doing its own policing. Just keep doing what we’re doing. Keep the Talibs at the margins. Keep training Afghan units. Keep teaming up with them in the field until they get it.

Essentially, its the same strategy that worked in Iraq. It will take longer, because there is less to work with. No point in getting in a big hurry.

This part of Asia is bandit country; it will always be bandit country. There will always have to be some kind of militarized police force up in the hills chasing bandits. We “won” when we chased the bandits into the hills. Now we have to do the day to day maintenance work of keeping them there, and building the force that will keep them there when we’ve gone on to the next crisis.


42 posted on 11/12/2009 10:48:38 AM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

Good post.


43 posted on 11/12/2009 10:50:30 AM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: MGMSwordsman
“Tell me again how this prick got elected?”

Blame all the dumbshits in our respective neighborhoods.

44 posted on 11/12/2009 10:53:46 AM PST by verity (Obama Lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marron

Excellent summary.

Indeed our problem in Afghanistan is NOT that “we’re locked in an unwinnable war”. We’re locked into unwinnable ROE.

Our troops may not shoot back if there is a ghost of a chance of a civilian being killed.

Our troops find it impossible to get arty or air support whenever there’s a ghost of a chance of a civilian being killed.

And the enemy are dressed as civilians, and routinely use real non-combatants as human shields.

I don’t think FReepers will have any trouble spotting the problem here.


45 posted on 11/12/2009 10:55:07 AM PST by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
Afghanistan has "not received the strategic attention, direction and resources it urgently requires". US President Barack Obama, 18 February.

"We've got to get the job done there," he said of Afghanistan. "And that requires us to have enough troops so that we're not just air-raiding villages and killing civilians, which is causing enormous problems there." Aug 2007

“It’s time to heed the call from General McKiernan and others for more troops. That’s why I’d send at least two or three additional combat brigades to Afghanistan. We also need more training for Afghan Security forces, more non-military assistance to help Afghans develop alternatives to poppy farming, more safeguards to prevent corruption, and a new effort to crack down on cross-border terrorism. Only a comprehensive strategy that prioritizes Afghanistan and the fight against al Qaeda will succeed, and that’s the change I’ll bring to the White House.” –Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL), in a speech Wednesday in Richmond, Virginia on national security policy.
46 posted on 11/12/2009 11:02:09 AM PST by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TexasRepublic
We could not stabilize that part of the world if we spent another 8 years or 800 years, so long as Islam poisons their minds.

I'm sorry, I can't agree.

The surge worked in Iraq.

The Pakis are cleaning up their side of the border.

If Obummer would apply a little Chicago style pressure on our enemies so as to win, instead of on the US population to knuckle under to "Eine volk, eine Fuehrer", it's be over shortly.

47 posted on 11/12/2009 11:03:35 AM PST by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: RC2
delay, delay, delay

Dither, dither, dither....

48 posted on 11/12/2009 11:05:11 AM PST by ErnBatavia (Obama is a DIC....... Ditherer-in-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marron; agere_contra
This part of Asia is bandit country; it will always be bandit country. There will always have to be some kind of militarized police force up in the hills chasing bandits. We “won” when we chased the bandits into the hills. Now we have to do the day to day maintenance work of keeping them there, and building the force that will keep them there when we’ve gone on to the next crisis.

There is more good sense about Afghanistan in this thread than in anything that is likely to emerge from the National Security Council.

I'll add my two bits.

I agree with agere_contra's view that we shouldn't be looking for another Iraq. In Afghanistan, that's neither feasible nor necessary. "Sorta O.K." is a good way to describe it -- a semi-liberalized center of the country, with a bearable level of corruption, the countryside with a moderate level of banditry -- and a domestic security force capable of limiting both. All in all, that would be a modest -- and meaningful -- step forward for the country.

But there should be another equally strategic objective: ruthlessly exterminate the Taliban. Presently, we're fighting a disparate collection of factions and bandits. Fact is, while they might think they've got a beef against us, we don't really have a beef against them.

It is said that Afghan tribesmen can't be bought; but they can be rented.

Accordingly, I'd favor a plan that recruited (i.e., paid) the bandits to help us root out and ruthlessly exterminate the Taliban -- the guys we were originally after when he entered Afghanistan.

The benefit of such a policy would be that everybody would then be aware of what happens to crazies who dare to attack us. We will come halfway around the world to kill every one of them.

It makes a powerful point.

49 posted on 11/12/2009 11:07:42 AM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia

I would prefer that the military pull back to a safe area, then ask the President what he wants to do. Go to war and fight it the way a war is supposed to be fought....to win.....or bring the troops home? Two choices, nothing more.


50 posted on 11/12/2009 11:13:28 AM PST by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson