Posted on 11/14/2009 10:07:41 AM PST by iowamark
“Unfortunately Palin is too radioactive”
I beg your pardon? Could we have a definition of your terms, please?
Unfortunately Palin is too radioactive to be a viable candidate in 2012. Not that I wish that but it just is.
*********************************************************
Your obsevation is a recipe for another disastrous defeat in 2012. Consider,
The radioactive charge will be front and center on any, let me repeat, any effective conservative Republican. The press will see to that. Let us instead use the Drive-by’s labeling. If the candidate is not radioactive he should be eliminated by us.
It would seem a good harbinger to be considered radioactive if you are running as a conservative Republican. Reagan was radioactive — Mccain not. Choose radioactive, my friend, or prepare for another Rino loss.
Godspeed
Why do you think they are so bent out of shape? Like cockroaches they can't stand the light. A lot of candidates are going to think twice before hooking up with any of these guys.
I notice that they discussed Sarah’s availability with the “candidate”. Should we assume that the candidate is McCain, because if it were Sarah, why not say it. I may be reading too much into this statement, but the way it was written is interesting, and allows for a lot of misinterpretation.
You posted, “When a Democrat lies, don’t complain, or say he’s being “misleading”: call him a lying dirtbag - in public. When a Democrat accuses you of wanting to starve children or throw granny into the street - call a news conference and have a truckload of manure sitting there. Then, tell the news media that you wanted to debate your opponent, but he declined, so you did the next best thing and brought a sampling of his ideas. You gotta think outside of the box, people. Have fun, stop whining and start winning.”
You are sooooooooo right.!! Proof is that George Bush did not fight back when he was attacked, which made him look weak and added to his unpopularity....a setback for Conservatives.
Thinking outside of the box, and taking the offensive is just exactly what we are doing with the Tea Parties.
Hah—these incompetents just fear for their careers, which ought to be over.
Fireman 5
Excellent post. I said the much the same at post 62 before I had read yours.
Godspeed
What kind of person hires a loser for his campaign...doesn’t speak well to his intelligence..
Can't wait for my book - pre-ordered on day one.
If these excerpts are any example, it's gonna be a great read.
I saw a clip of the Oprah interview - The ‘soft-spoken, caring faced, Oprah” is no where to be seen. Her face and voice are both hard and hostile = and she condescended to have Sarah on because, like Kati C., she's in bad need of ratings.
I would have preferred Sarah not give her the time of day, but I suspicion her publisher required it. Oprah has catapulted many books into best sellers.
Sarah's has been a best seller for weeks - and not even off the presses. She didn't need Oprah...and I hate for Oprah to jump on board and take any credit for it's success.
It would have been a great coup to say: “Sarah's book runaway best seller - without Oprah/”
McCainus, is that you?
Who would be a more viavble candidate?
If you ask me, she’s just about unstoppable.
“THROW A ROCK IN A HERD OF PIGS (very apropos in this instance) AND THE ONE WHO YOU HIT SQUEELS THE LOUDEST.”
Who was the dope in McCain’s camp that quit because he wouldn’t criticize Obama?
Campaign staffers are pretty much on the level of prostitutes. You pay for their love, and they’ll sell it to anybody. Palin’s problem was that she was too inexperienced to stand up to these jaded whores from the get-go and tell them who the boss was.
|
Thanks to BufordP for the ping! |
|
Message to top aides to Senator McCain.
Shut up.
It’s Sarah’s turn now. Just STFU.
which were published on The New York Times website which were published on ABCNews.com which were published on CNN.com which were published on....
Did any of you actually read the book!!!???
How is that every damn "review" of the book contains the same damn excerpts!!!
Bunch of newsholes.
For the life of me, I tell you what, I'm going to go out and buy my own damn copy because there's got to be more in there that what you jackasses are reporting on.
Good!
I have always felt that McCain suffered some sort of cognitive loss (in judgment) from being tortured. Also, he has surrounded him self with syncopates who are not honorable. Can’t all these individuals resign, retire or just walk away? They are so tiresome.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
