Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Money is being wasted on men's prostate exams' -- White House
Fox News Channel | 11/17/09

Posted on 11/17/2009 11:29:17 AM PST by pabianice

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121 next last
To: pabianice

bttt


41 posted on 11/17/2009 11:50:55 AM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jaydubya2

It’s cheaper to let people die then treat them...

While I agree with the proposal to reduce the frequency of mammography, and there is some research indicating that the annual PSA and prostate check is not going to pick up a lot more cancers, unfortunatel all we have regarding cancer is early detection and prevention.

The next thing will be the sigmoidoscopy over the age of 50, not being necessary.

Research is showing benefits that go beyond just lowering cholesterol for people taking statins such as Lipitor.

Also, for the treatment of pre-hypertension.


42 posted on 11/17/2009 11:51:17 AM PST by nikos1121 (Praying for -16.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

There’s pretty good science behind this. In March of this year, the lead article in the New England Journal of Medicine looked at death rates from prostate cancer between men who were screened and treated for prostate cancer and those who weren’t. No difference in the two groups after 10 years of follow up.


43 posted on 11/17/2009 11:51:57 AM PST by CholeraJoe ("Everything's a lie, and that's a fact.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Too young to be diagnosed, too old to be treated. Death is the way of the Obama Communists. It is about control. Well, we’ve got control, too, 2nd amendment control.


44 posted on 11/17/2009 11:52:21 AM PST by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

So.. The Stimulus money WAS well spent?


45 posted on 11/17/2009 11:52:37 AM PST by historyrepeatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

That would be Barney’s Frank. No thanks.


46 posted on 11/17/2009 11:53:21 AM PST by grumpygresh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

These were supposedly based on independent studies done at Harvard, Berkly, etc. Guess where the funding for these studies came from.


47 posted on 11/17/2009 11:53:29 AM PST by Tenacious 1 (Government For the People - an obviously concealed oxymoron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Well duh!!!!

The government is simultaneously the biggest medical insurer AND the institution that writes the guidelines on what should and shouldn't be standard practice. They're not necessarily doing this to allow private insurers an out. They're doing this so that Medicare and Medicaid can avoid paying for 10 years worth of medical screening for each and all of their insured.

We've already learned that Medicare and Medicaid deny more claims than any other major insured...at a nearly 2-to-1 clip. This will just allow them to deny more claims. This shouldn't be news: where did we think the $500 billion in cuts would come from?!?!?!

48 posted on 11/17/2009 11:54:47 AM PST by Fredgoblu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HotKat

That’s exactly what China has done through mandatory abortion. At least one of the Obamanation’s czars supports that concept for us.


49 posted on 11/17/2009 11:54:57 AM PST by piytar (Go Away RNC, Steele, Graham, and the rest of the lib-loser GOP. WE'RE TAKING OUR PARTY BACK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

LOL! Going for paper towel. H0fe kympuker slil wdfrks.


50 posted on 11/17/2009 11:55:05 AM PST by Tenacious 1 (Government For the People - an obviously concealed oxymoron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
More government studies:

Expensive cancer treatments are for wimps!

Only pussies need MRIs!

51 posted on 11/17/2009 11:55:37 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
What about those men and women who are in a high risk group because a member of their family had Breast Cancer or Prostate Cancer?

The words "high risk" alone are enough to warrant early screening.

sw

52 posted on 11/17/2009 11:55:44 AM PST by spectre (Spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Normally Dems have no opinion on what consenting adults do with their rectums...


53 posted on 11/17/2009 11:56:39 AM PST by delacoert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1

When my last antigen test came back(.2), it implied that my prostate had been removed. Why in the world would I take the test then?


54 posted on 11/17/2009 11:57:37 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

I heard that Barney Frank will give you one for free.


55 posted on 11/17/2009 11:57:37 AM PST by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
"Money is being wasted on men's prostate exams' -- White House"
Headline could read: Obama restricts PSA tests, gives voters the finger.
56 posted on 11/17/2009 11:58:10 AM PST by dblshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: albie
What business is it of that pipsqueak if I go every other day for a prostate exam!?

That qualifies as pleasure, not healthcare.

57 posted on 11/17/2009 11:59:00 AM PST by CholeraJoe ("Everything's a lie, and that's a fact.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
I heard that Barney Frank will give you one for free.

...I also heard he could do the free exam with no hands.

Aren't they changing the name of a prostrate exam to "Government help check"? It's the same concept.

58 posted on 11/17/2009 12:01:10 PM PST by Tenacious 1 (Government For the People - an obviously concealed oxymoron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
"Money is being wasted on men's prostate exams' -- White House"

Dear White House;

Exactly how many prostate exams will $480,000 per month pay for, or $5,760,000 per year? Well, that's just what Nazi Pelosi spends on her taxpayer provided luxury jet plane so she can go home and back. (Note: My employer does not pay my way to work, or my way home, and doesn't furnish a vehicle).

Nazi Pelosi spends $60,000 per trip of our money, and yet you state that a prostate exam is "wasteful"?

OK, ok...let's throw in taking Air Force One, and all of it's security and contingency staff to New York for a date; or a "flyover" for a photo opp; Not to mention the numerous "Apology Tour '09" and sapling-planting trips the kenyan is taking on a regular basis.

Remember obama von zippers favorite term - "DEFICIT NEUTRAL" - well why don't we start with all of those things and 30+ czars exhorbitant salaries before we start talking medicare cutbacks.

And, I'm sure the trillions you've got stashed in "obamaescrow" would pay for plenty prostate AND mammogram exams.

Finally, how do we know you're stupid...anyone trying to get a bogus bill like healthcare rammed down our throats wouldn't then go around boasting about all of the things it WON'T pay for.

A taxaper $60,000. Folks, that is $480,000 per month and that is an annual cost to the taxpayers of $5,760,000.
59 posted on 11/17/2009 12:01:39 PM PST by FrankR (AMERICA: You'll end up where you're going, if you don't change your direction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
All I want to know is whether he gets screened and Michelle-ma-Belle gets tested every year????

Right! Nuff said, but don't hold your breath waiting for any reporter to ask that question.

60 posted on 11/17/2009 12:01:42 PM PST by Conservative Vermont Vet ((One of ONLY 37 Conservatives in the People's Republic of Vermont. Socialists and Progressives All))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson