Skip to comments.Orly Taitz Refuses to Pay Judge’s $20,000 Sanction
Posted on 11/17/2009 12:06:33 PM PST by mnehring
Orly Taitz is refusing to pay a $20,000 sanction issued by Judge Clay Land, who is also presiding over the Mark Shelnutt trial.
Taitz is the California attorney who filed a motion for Capt. Connie Rhodes. Rhodes attempted to halt her Iraq deployment on the grounds that President Obamas holding office was not legitimate.
Taitz told News 3 that she believes the sanctions were asserted in an attempt to silence her challenge of Obamas legitimacy.
I really havent done anything that would justify the sanction. If anything it is the opposite. The sanction was not justified. It was a political move. It is an extremely dangerous precedent to set.
Taitz has retained counsel for her appeal.
She should start a legal defense fund and start accepting donations. While many here would not contribute, some would if nothing more than to protest Obama.
Hey Land, pay the fine yourself.
Free Orly Taitz !!
I’m printing the T shirts as we type.
She's been soliciting contributions to support her legal antics for some time now. One of her websites has a link where you can send her money.
What. An. Idiot.
Standing to do what?
contempt of court on top of the fine.
A federal judge in Georgia has ordered the US Attorney to collect a $20,000 judgment against Orly Taitz after the Birther attorney failed to pay the fine -- which she appealed -- within 30 days.
Here's the full order from Judge Clay Land, of the US District Court in the Middle District Of Georgia:
"Orly Taitz has failed to pay the $20,000.00 sanction ordered by the Court on October 13, 2009. Accordingly, the Clerk is ordered to enter final judgment in favor of the United States of America and against Orly Taitz in the principal amount of $20,000.00. The United States Attorney is authorized and directed to collect the judgment as provided by law.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 13th day of November, 2009. "
Must mean she's worried.
Could be a plan to get the issue to the Supreme Court.
This may backfire- maybe it will cause her to have ‘standing’
since no one else seems to have legal ‘standing’ to ask for proof that our Pres—ent is legitimate
We are only citizens, after all, who are required to pay the taxes this Obozo imposes
I am all for this woman’s efforts- The more we can do to disrupt Obambi the better
The only issue that can go up on appeal is whether she was properly sanctioned. That appeal will not bring up the issue of Obama's eligibility, because she was not sanctioned for filing the original lawsuit; she was sanctioned only for her motion to reconsider, which violated the court rules in a number of ways, and for her subsequent filing in which she accused the judge of "treason" and claimed that the judge met with Attorney General Holder (on a day when Holder was in Los Angeles).
Here are my questions for the group:
1.) Why is Taitz being slapped with a $20,000 fine over technicalities and other BS for pursuing Obama's birth certificate? What is the real reason for this?
2.) Why has Obama stolen and spent over 1.7 million taxpayer dollars preventing his birth certificate and other public records from being viewed by the public?
3.) If Obama has nothing to hide, then why is Taitz being destroyed by these Kangaroo court systems? Why is Obama spending all that taxpayer cash to cover up his life history?
As a taxpayer, I would love to know these answers.
“Wonder if that idiot judge said something in his diatribe that would circumspectly open a can of worms for the pres—ent.”
Yes! After Taitz filed a motion to reconsider, the plaintiff, Rhodes, attempted to contact the court to object to the filing.
Instead of advising the plaintiff to contact her attorney and inform her of plaintiff’s demand to cease and desist, the Clerk of the Court began negotiating with the plaintiff to file a motion with the court. The Clerk of the Court knew the plaintiff was represented by an attorney. The only appropriate response would have been to instruct the plaintiff to contact her representative (Taitz).
The Clerk of the Court stepped in it further by contacting the US Attorney’s office and informing him of plaintiff’s ex-parte communications with the Court.
When this is over, it will be a laundry list of ethics violations against Judge Land and the US Attorney’s office.
2) He hasn't.
3) She's incompetent.
That was pretty easy, really.