Data on Arrest Records Aren't Always by the Book

Wall Street Journal ^ | 11/18/2009 | Wall Street Journal

[The Magical Mischief Tour]

Old Reports Suggesting One-Third to One-Half of All Men Are Apprehended Had Flaws, but New Studies Confirm a High Rate

More than 40 years ago, President Lyndon B. Johnson's crime commission reported that half of American men would be arrested at some point in their lives. Today, crime data remain consistent with that figure -- and are bedeviled by many similar flaws.

Researchers who announced the stunning arrest rates in 1967 were stumped by data deficiencies, such as their inability to tell whether the same person was being counted more than once -- an often overlooked point the researchers made in their own report. Today, data problems in crime measurement persist. Reporting by local law-enforcement agencies is incomplete, and criminologists say local data aren't calculated in a uniform way across the U.S.

To mitigate gaps and inconsistencies in the numbers, the Federal Bureau of Investigation extrapolates from the numbers it does have to get a nationwide total.

That 52% of American men will be arrested originated in a report from the President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice. Ronald Christensen, then a graduate student in physics who held degrees in electrical engineering and law, was asked to crunch the numbers on arrests and convictions. He set out to calculate how many men and women at each age had been arrested, counting juvenile arrests. Mr. Christensen assumed that current arrest rates would hold.

[Leftism is Mentally Deranged]

It’s very easy to lie with statistics. Even easier for the public to fall for the lies.