Posted on 11/20/2009 1:39:35 AM PST by jsh3180
Now all we need is for the second hand smoke fraud to be hacked.
This will show the folks that the gov. is taking away thier rights by any means possible including lieing out thier tailpipe.
Just mass emailed this proof of the gahorrible warming crew-—spewing lies like we all knew they were. Gotta get this out so far and wide the lamestream presstitutes can’t ignore it.
FTP site appears down or hammered. But did manage to get another copy downloaded from torrent sites.
“Because of the volume of this information we cannot currently confirm that all of this material is genuine.”
Here’s the spin.
i’m afraid this post is all i’ll ever see on this topic.
if it shows up on slashdot i’ll be impressed. (not that the slashdot community is anything to aspire to, but they certainly have ‘volume’)
bttt
Someone needs to send this to Senator Jim Inhofe of Oklahoma.
Watch for said hacker to become “mysteriously” missing or die in a “mysterious” accident.
If this is for real.......THEY ARE TOAST! Robbing, thieving Marxists caught red-handed!!!!!!!
.....and Rathergate.....to the 10th power!
Scientists Lied - SUV’s Died
I posted one of their propaganda docs
THE RULES OF THE GAME...VERY ENLIGHTENING.
Mikey Mann, responds:
“I’m simply not going to comment on the content of illegally obtained emails. However, I will say this: both their theft and, I believe, any reproduction of the emails that were obtained on public websites, etc, constitutes serious criminal activity. I’m hoping that the perpetrators and their facilitators will be tracked down and prosecuted to the fullest extent the law allows.”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/nov/20/climate-sceptics-hackers-leaked-emails
LMAO! :)
Oh those cold earthers. We should not stoop to their level. I will fire anyone from my campaign who says anything negative about my opponent.
Many of us suspected this was happening. So many logical problems with the GW theory that even as a non scientist it was just very hard to swallow. The institutional pressures applied to demand belief were my starting point to think about the probability of the “scientific consensus” of GW. For me as a lay person my skepticism was based on historical accounts that in the past Europe had been colder and Europe had been warmer. I coupled that in my thinking about the short time line we are looking at. How long have we had temperature measuring stations in place? A couple of hundred years. How consistent were the instruments? How much had change around the instruments? Had the instruments changed? The sample seemed too small and the data seemed tenuous. Scientist also were trying to construct evidence based on non instrument data, tree rings in siberia and ice core samples. That was always the fall back argument when I brought up sample size and temperature samples. But the bottom line was the historical temperature readings were integral to the argument! Then the next question in my mind was why, given the very shaky evidence was the theory being pushed so hard? After asking those questions but being crushed by institutional pressures it is very gratifying to see the evidence of what I and we believed was happening in the climate science industry! So happy day. The beginning of the end I hope!
Can’t WAIT to hear Rush crowing about this!! :D
Mikie Mann: UC Berkeley and Yale grad. Predictable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.