Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lou Dobbs Considers Possible Presidential Run
FoxNews ^ | November 23, 2009

Posted on 11/23/2009 12:24:53 PM PST by Steelfish

November 23, 2009 Lou Dobbs Considers Possible Presidential Run

Lou Dobbs, who resigned from CNN in November after nearly three decades with the network, suggested in a radio interview Monday that he's eyeing a future in politics.

Former populist CNN anchor Lou Dobbs said Monday he isn't ruling out a presidential run.

Dobbs, who resigned from CNN in November after nearly three decades with the network, suggested in a radio interview with WTOP in Washington, D.C., that he's eyeing a future in politics.

"What's so crazy about that?" Dobbs quipped when asked about a possible presidential run. "It's one of the discussions that we're having."

"For the first time, I'm actually listening to some people about, about politics," he said. "We've got to do something in this country."

Support for Dobbs as a presidential contender took form on the Internet well before the veteran newsman announced his departure from CNN, where he worked as anchor and managing editor of "Lou Dobb's Tonight."

The Web site, "loudobbsforpresident.org," launched in January 2009 to rally support for a possible 2012 presidential run.

"Lou Dobbs would make a good president because he is truly a man of the people," the Web site's founder, William Gheen, told FoxNews.com Monday.

Gheen, who also heads Americans for Legal Immigration, said Dobbs "has been more in line with the American public on issues like global trade, homeland security and illegal immigration than either of the Democrats or Republicans we have been offered in the last nine years."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; 2012gopprimary; dobbs; dobbs2012
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 11/23/2009 12:24:54 PM PST by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

He has no experience.

But if Zerobama could get elected, then why not Lou?


2 posted on 11/23/2009 12:27:09 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (Ack, is that the site with "Responsibility2nd"? Some weirdo. ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Lou was a good news guy......but I wouldn’t vote for the guy.


3 posted on 11/23/2009 12:27:15 PM PST by Fred911 (YOU GET WHAT YOU ACCEPT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Good. He’s a man of his word as witnessed by his stint at CNN when he went against his employer on the continnum. He could’ve caved and kept his job but he stood by his principles. He’s an honest broker and tells it like he sees it. I’d certainly vote for him.


4 posted on 11/23/2009 12:30:00 PM PST by bronxville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

How about treasury sec in a Palin administration?


5 posted on 11/23/2009 12:30:18 PM PST by THX 1138 ("Harry, I have a gift.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Lou Dobbs? Now I have to go and research this guy?

I already voted for Newt and Sarah for 2012. I’m not going to vote again.....or am I?


6 posted on 11/23/2009 12:30:38 PM PST by Tenacious 1 (Government For the People - an obviously concealed oxymoron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1

Why on earth would you vote for Newt?


7 posted on 11/23/2009 12:36:18 PM PST by dandiegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Big mistake. Start with something more reasonable, Lou.


8 posted on 11/23/2009 12:40:43 PM PST by elhombrelibre (Barak Obama - a man who turns a blindeye to Islamists murderers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

“Big mistake. Start with something more reasonable, Lou.”

Yep, something more reasonable, like Governor of a border state.


9 posted on 11/23/2009 12:43:36 PM PST by LottieDah (If only those who speak so eloquently on the rights of animals would do so on behalf the unborn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dandiegirl

He is a leader. He is hawkish on national security. He is for drilling for our own oil. He is for soveriegnty and smaller government. He cuts taxes and is against government healthcare. He is no fan of the UN and has been an advocate of “fixing” social security. He is for 100% control of the southern boarder and prosecution and/or deportation of all illegals (he did have a pause as I recall early) but did speak out against Bush’s plan.

Points agains newt....He let Clinton raise taxes and he waivered on Bush’s bailout plan.

I see some political opportunism. It’s early and I speak in jest. But he and SP are my going votes for now.

Why not?


10 posted on 11/23/2009 12:45:43 PM PST by Tenacious 1 (Government For the People - an obviously concealed oxymoron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

The problem is, Dobbs wouldn’t be running as a Republican. And a third-party candidate with his stature and visability would be a disaster. Especially if Huckabee (the John McCain of 2012) is our nominee.


11 posted on 11/23/2009 12:45:51 PM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

3rd party time for Dobbs?


12 posted on 11/23/2009 12:46:00 PM PST by yongin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Lou is delusional. That being said, he’d do a better job than Obama. But then, so would my mama. Hey—that rhymes!


13 posted on 11/23/2009 12:47:29 PM PST by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1
Newt?


14 posted on 11/23/2009 12:49:26 PM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Too many candidates may be worse than too few.


15 posted on 11/23/2009 12:50:09 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

They have to make sure a 3rd party takes Republican votes to get Obama re-elected. 3rd Party=Disaster.


16 posted on 11/23/2009 12:54:05 PM PST by screaminsunshine (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: yongin

How about a DOBBS/TANCREDO TICKET

OR MAYBE A DOBBS/BUCHANAN TICKET

(oh, and I’m getting a pony for Christmas)


17 posted on 11/23/2009 12:54:05 PM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: maggief

I’ll do some more research?


18 posted on 11/23/2009 12:59:16 PM PST by Tenacious 1 (Government For the People - an obviously concealed oxymoron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

It all depends upon the GOP nominee. If it is Romney or McCain (again) Lou could do well.


19 posted on 11/23/2009 1:00:24 PM PST by MBB1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

I think Lou needs to turn his attention back to a senatorial run in New Jersey. We don’t need any third party presidential runs by conservatives, and we don’t need multiple conservative candidates in the Republican primaries splitting the votes to the benefit of Tim Pawlenty.


20 posted on 11/23/2009 1:02:04 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson