Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pakistan's President Hands Over Nuclear Powers
AP via Yahoo News ^ | Sat Nov 28 | Sajjad Tarakzai

Posted on 11/28/2009 5:24:21 PM PST by edpc

ISLAMABAD (AFP) – President Asif Ali Zardari gave up control of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal Saturday in a bid to fend off mounting pressures threatening to weaken his rule further and complicate the war on the Taliban.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: nuclear; pakistan; southasia; wot
1 posted on 11/28/2009 5:24:24 PM PST by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: edpc

This is not good.

2 posted on 11/28/2009 5:26:29 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("We will either find a way, or make one."Hannibal/Carthaginian Military Commander)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

Does anyone know any details about Raza Gilani, the Prime Minister who now has the nuclear key? The article mentioned that he is close to the military.

3 posted on 11/28/2009 5:30:28 PM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin
I'm sure he went to all 'the right' madrassas schools...
4 posted on 11/28/2009 5:35:55 PM PST by null and void (We are now in day 310 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: edpc

So, we have to wait until December to know the results of this episode of “as the moozie turns”.

5 posted on 11/28/2009 5:36:58 PM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...Call 'em What you Will, They ALL have Fairies Living In Their Trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc
This is a dangerous loosening of the control. Her is how the President of Pakistan is elected:

"According to the Constitution, the President is chosen by the Electoral College to serve a five-year term. The electoral college comprises the Senate, National Assembly, and the provincial assemblies." (link)

Compare to the Prime Minister:

"The Prime Minister is elected by the National Assembly, members of which are elected by popular vote. Most commonly, the leader of the party or coalition with the most votes becomes the Prime Minister." (link)

This means that the Prime Minister is elected indirectly, through the party that won the majority or formed a coalition. That's how back-room deals are made. With enough goods (or threats) on members of National Assembly anyone can be selected to become the Prime Minister overnight. The Assembly has 342 seats, but you only need to lean onto just a few lawmakers to make a difference - in the USA we know how that works.

6 posted on 11/28/2009 8:15:57 PM PST by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc; sonofstrangelove
The office of president used to be an administrative position only, until Musharraf took over. He expanded the presidenty's powers to be able to dissolve the supreme court, parliament and prime minister at any time and declare martial law at will, essentially a dictatorship.

Zardari took over the presidency promising to return the presidency to its prior status and allow the prime minister and parliament to rule Pakistan by the old plurality system overseen by the supreme court.

This move of handing over the nuclear keys to a more secure civilian command continues that process. Eventually, the presidency will be of little use to military strongmen and their coup d'etat urges. Also, the parliament will then be the primary forum for political debate, lessening the criticism and distrust of the military.

7 posted on 11/28/2009 9:29:48 PM PST by gandalftb (OK State football: 9-2 Go Cowboys!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb
I do not think that these missile sites are secure. Many of the commanders are already been "radicalized" and support the Taliban. Many of these missile sites are located in the Punjab where more radicalized Islamists are located. Too bad we cannot post the New Yorker article which scared the s#hit out of me how far the Pakistani government hates the U.S.These are all the missile and places where nuclear material are located

8 posted on 11/28/2009 10:19:33 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("We will either find a way, or make one."Hannibal/Carthaginian Military Commander)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Repeat Offender; Pining_4_TX; Forgiven_Sinner; grey_whiskers; BlueDragon; LittleBillyInfidel; ...

Pakistan ۋﮧ۱م

FReepmail if you want on or off
9 posted on 11/29/2009 10:53:11 AM PST by G8 Diplomat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G8 Diplomat
What is your take, given the means of selecting the Prime Minister?


10 posted on 11/29/2009 11:56:44 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

The PM is in a more politically secure position (i.e. not worried so much about losing his power) because people don’t hate him like they do Zardari, a.k.a. Mr. 10% (his approval rating at one time—he should compare notes with Congress). However, the PM is elected by popular vote, and given the sympathetic nature of many Pakistanis to the Taliban that opens up the possibility of someone less than ideal getting into office (well, no one’s ideal in Pakistan but you get the picture ;) ). On the other hand, the president is short on power because it’s the army and the ISI that really call the shots. So moving the nuke keys from one politically weak civilian leader to another doesn’t seem like a drastic change to me.

However, there’s been a decline in popular opinion of the Taliban lately as people started to get tired of stuff blowing up in Waziristan every few days, and if that continues the danger of electing a total whacko as PM would decrease.

Interestingly enough, lots of Pakistanis are already calling for the return of Musharraf, or at least a military dictatorship, because they’re tired of Zardari’s corruption. A military dictator with the nuclear keys would be the best option because he is able to keep a tighter hold on the country.

11 posted on 11/29/2009 1:10:21 PM PST by G8 Diplomat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson