Skip to comments.Was the Iraq war illegal? Poll
Posted on 11/29/2009 12:09:20 PM PST by DBlake
Ministers in Britain were secretly told that the United States were set on "regime change" in Iraq...
Not to wax philisophical here but what IS legal?
Regime change in Iraq became a stated goal of United States foreign policy when Public Law 105-338 (the "Iraq Liberation Act") was signed into law by U.S. President Bill Clinton. The act directed that:
"It should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and to promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime."
Was the Iraq war illegal? Poll
try this... lies my father told me....
which are all out in the leftists field now...
Secret? Clinton said it was official US policy.
Was the election of Barack Obama legal?
Where’s the polls on that?
When it comes to war I mean?
What a huge secret. Congress passed a law stating that and Bill Clinton signed it in 1998.
Bravo! Good question and one that deserves answering.
Iraq’s ceasefire terms violations made it VERY legal.
Bush Is Right on Iraq: The Issue Is Compliance, Not Inspections
by Brett D. Schaefer and Baker Spring
President George W. Bush’s resolve in confronting Iraq over its decade-long record of defiance of the United Nations has succeeded in getting Baghdad to agree unconditionally to the return of U.N. weapons inspectors. Their mission will continue to be to search out and destroy Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and ballistic missiles. While Baghdad’s recent letter acquiescing to the inspections is promising, it does not mean that the crisis has been defused or that further confrontation with Iraq can be avoided. As the President has reminded the U.N. and Congress, the real issue is not the inspections but Iraq’s consistent failure to comply with U.N. Security Council resolutions, which require it to disarm, cease supporting terrorism and violating the human rights of its people, and account for those missing from the Persian Gulf War.
Because Iraq failed to comply with these resolutions even when U.N. inspectors were in Iraq, the return of inspectors is no guarantee of success in enforcing U.N. resolutions. The Security Council should adopt a new resolution that documents Iraq’s violations of existing U.N. resolutions, demands compliance, and authorizes the use of force if Iraq fails to comply. It should not adopt a resolution that merely commends Iraq for allowing the inspectors to return
NOW! Thats the best yet!
1. committed various and significant violations of International Law,
2. had failed to comply with the obligations to which it had agreed following the Gulf War and
3. further had ignored Resolutions of the United Nations Security Council.
The Act declared that it was the Policy of the United States to support "regime change." The Act was passed 360-38 in the U.S. House of Representatives  and by unanimous consent in the Senate.  US President Bill Clinton signed the bill into law on October 31, 1998.
Wars are either just or unjust, not legal or illegal. The Iraq war is just.
“Laws of war” is a goofy concept to begin with. Laws much have an enforcement mechanism ... the UN cannot exercise mandatory enforcement.
The laws of war are written by the victors, and are largely irrelevant during the war. The losers are prosecuted, the winners are not.
Not only that ... but laws of war are entirely unenforceable against more powerful militaries. If the US truly committed a war crime — who could do anything about it? The UN could raise the greatest military force it could muster, and we could likely crush it where it stood.
A law without an enforcement provision is a legal irrelevancy.
The power was given to the President by congessional vote to “use force”. That is pretty clear to me.
I like the philosophical question posed as to what makes a war really legal?
Wow! Unexpected results.
Dictators have no rights!
I found this the other day. Doesn’t make Cheney look too good. Curious how much is true. The first article. Just read down some.
parsy, who is watching the Monk marathon
I like the philosophical question posed as to what makes a war really legal?
Remember war is good, until it conflicts with a leftist and Homo-Leninist agenda; just look at Africa, Middle East and Bosnia
Who you gonna believe? ;-)
There is no INTERNATIONAL LAW since there is NOT ONE BIG GOVERNMENT of the world!
This is a bad HOAX from the libtard propaganda machine(obaMAO involved?)
i’d say that bush’s intellegance on iraq was probally 80%- i would have liked to have seen photos, or a team go in there to varify- the commander in chief needs to be 100% positive before he puts americans soldiers in harms way. i think bush was alittle aggressive towards iraq, but it is a 2 headed coin also- are we better off with S. Hussein gone? yeah, i think so
“Either war is obsolete or men are’’.
Was the Iraq war illegal?
You voted: No
It wasn’t illegal.
We were in a state of cessation of hostilities form Gulf War I.
Iraq had repeatedly broken 17 of the 29 requirements for a continued “Cessation of Hostilities”.
In the lense of 911, we were done and had every right to resume hostilities. However, we went to the U.N. and sought their stamp of approval, for resumption and to enforce our 1998 Iraq Liberation Act, which was signed into law by all 100 Senators, at that time and Bill Clinton, the then current President.
The United States acted as lead in a coalition of several countries and with the consent of the U.N.
Was the Iraq war Illegal? No. It had lasted 12 years longer than necessary.
Yep. It was the intent of the United States Government to remove the Sadaam Regime.
And in the end, Cheney didn't make much if anything out of Iraq oil, so there was really little if anything behind all the anti Bush conspiracy oil mongering which was always light on facts and strong on what ifs, anyway. But Bush and Cheney haters will probably never let the facts stop their dishonest hatefest.
I always thought the WMD stuff was kaa-kaa, and said so here, but once we went in, I shut up about it. Still the point is, why did we knock off Saddam? FWIW, I don’t hate Cheney. Not fond of Bush but more over economic stuff than this. I am just curious about the truth.
parsy, who remembers the hoopla about invading Iraq
When that expired, Dec 31, 2008, the legal basis was the Status of Forces Agreement aka Iraq Security Agreement
The new Iraq government, not 'we', executed Saddam, if that's what you mean. That was their option, of course. You may mean something else than this, but its impossible to tell from what you posted so far.
You may have felt that WMD's didn't exist before the Iraq War, but few others believed that. Right before the Iraq War, even Democrats in Congress were creating legislation and making speeches against Saddam for having WMD. Now these nauseating LW hypocrites are pretending they were never on board the WMD wagon right up to the beginning of the Iraq War.
The left is making a mad dash for ‘regine’ change in the US. Their goal is a solidly totalitarian govt.
[[Was the Iraq war illegal? Poll]]
How about a better poll?
Were the actions of Saddam, putting people through meatgrinders while they were alive, setting people in fore- Stripping the meat from peopel whiel they screamed for mercy, throwing people off tall buildings, beheadign htem, raping them- Were those actions illegal, and a massive travesty that the world COULD NOT IGNORE?
‘Was the Iraq war legal’? Cripes!
Was the Iraq war legal? Cripes! It was a freaking duty to take out that madman which the UN IGNORED for years! If anythign, waiting as long as they did to do absolutely nothing shoudl be concidered illegal- NOT the waR!
well that settlews it then- people’s opinions are more important than stopping a mass murderer- swell- lovely world we live in- Hooray for us- to hell with anyone else